Jump to content

Official :6 English teams agree to Super League


Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, SiJ said:

Should be said that no battle has been won here.

 

The nuclear bomb was stopped but the landscape has already been torched with napalm.

 

The likes of Sky, BT etc., presenting this as some sort of victory for the fans is quite nauseating frankly. They are very much culpable in this mess.

 

Root and branch reform needed up and down the pyramid. I won't hold my breath.

Disagree, a battle has been won here

Problem is, it's the first of many in this war.

 

Enough is enough really. Even a basic, basic thing like a salary cap of a measly £150k a week would fix so many of the race to the bottom problems we're seeing thats driven by the insatiable greed of owners, agents, players, broadcasters, footballing bodies... the whole lot. Something needs to change and the madness needs to stop.

 

COVID and this nonsense will hopefully create a momentum and desire to finally bring about a change. The game we all love has been bástardised for years... we've stopped it being torn to pieces, now we need to start bringing it back from the precipice it's been standing before for the last decade or more.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, StudentOwl said:

Disagree, a battle has been won here

Problem is, it's the first of many in this war.

 

Enough is enough really. Even a basic, basic thing like a salary cap of a measly £150k a week would fix so many of the race to the bottom problems we're seeing thats driven by the insatiable greed of owners, agents, players, broadcasters, footballing bodies... the whole lot. Something needs to change and the madness needs to stop.

 

COVID and this nonsense will hopefully create a momentum and desire to finally bring about a change. The game we all love has been bástardised for years... we've stopped it being torn to pieces, now we need to start bringing it back from the precipice it's been standing before for the last decade or more.

I don't think you need a salary cap of 150k for individuals, just cap total spend on wages at something like 100m per year or something. Then it's to the clubs to manage that, they may choose to have a squad all on the same 60k ish a week or one player on 200k. You reduce the cap down each of the leagues accordingly. Zero excuse to not make reforms now though 

  • Like 2
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, TheGaffer said:

I don't think you need a salary cap of 150k for individuals, just cap total spend on wages at something like 100m per year or something. Then it's to the clubs to manage that, they may choose to have a squad all on the same 60k ish a week or one player on 200k. You reduce the cap down each of the leagues accordingly. Zero excuse to not make reforms now though 

 

Yup. Salary cap is the only way.

 

But. Loopholes and sponsorship/endorsements etc need to be carefully monitored. Clubs will find ways around it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So most of Liverpools fans have accepted John Henry's half ar53d apoligy and now want him to back klopp with hundreds of millions of pounds in the transfer window 

 

Sums modern football up 

 

Meanwhile we are in transfer embargos for going over 39 million spending, while Barcelona are 1 billion quid in debt 

 

Nothing will change

Makes me sick 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SallyCinnamon said:


Sky’s hypocrisy is amazing.

 

They’ve made money the focus of the game and paved the way for these owners to try things like this.

 

And this won’t be the end of it. Can’t help but feel the owners did this to test the waters and gauge the public reaction. They’re not stupid - they knew this would get a significant backlash. At the end of the day they really don’t care what fans think. John Henry can put an apology video out, but balls does he mean it. Just ticking a box. 

Alternatively - Sky’s remit is to make money via advertising and subscriptions.  They spotted a popular product and bid for it.  The PL decide that each year the product is worth more and Sky have to keep increasing their commitment to secure access.

 

What the PL and individual clubs then do with that money is not the fault of Sky.  Every single one of those 6 clubs with their combined £1.5bn debt chose to spend their money the way they did.  They didn’t have to pay players £250k a week, or an agent £1m to secure a transfer.  But they didn’t want other clubs to get ahead.

 

Sky have provided the funds to improve stadia, facilities and the technical ability of players, and to entice better players from around the world.  The clubs themselves have chosen to get themselves into debt.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, scram said:

Well if this forces change for the better then great - i don't think it will and i'm convinced the breakaway group will still end up better off ultimately

 

There needs to be a fan charter which must include things like wages to turnover at a realiistic level - not the catastrophe it currently is

 

proper fan representation in the boardroom - not just a few platitudes at talking shops

 

Cheaper tickets - more access to POTG at decent prices

 

Much less dicking around with kick off times/days - allowing travelling fans the opportunity of going to away games without having such travel issues as missing last trains/connections etc

 

Ultimately the outflow of money to players and agents is killing our game and it needs to be rethought and be realistic to the clubs ability to pay

 

And do away with the ridiculous restrictive practice of P&S

 

 

What needs to desperately happen and I think you touched on it is salary caps...PL clubs have been losing money year by year and it doesn't matter how much money they get from TV deals because this is dished out straight away for wages.

 

The big question is how you implement this cap fairly, for example if say Man Utd want to sign someone their wages will be much higher then Norwich City so the cap probably has to alter depending on circumstances...this could be a tricky thing or then it could be easy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, HIGHERSTATE said:

So it basicwlly

 

'Pipe down, leave the football to us and just keep supplying us with money!''


I’m confused as to what people want? The super six is folding, do we expect the fans to just be able to freely kick these owners out? 
 

Just be thankful this moronic idea isn’t happening 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fine them and have them start on minus 12 next season or something. Should be banned from competing in Europe for at least a season, if not more.

 

Might be more symbolic than anything else, but it is something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, TaxiMark said:

What needs to desperately happen and I think you touched on it is salary caps...PL clubs have been losing money year by year and it doesn't matter how much money they get from TV deals because this is dished out straight away for wages.

 

The big question is how you implement this cap fairly, for example if say Man Utd want to sign someone their wages will be much higher then Norwich City so the cap probably has to alter depending on circumstances...this could be a tricky thing or then it could be easy.

A salary cap only works if it’s implemented worldwide.  If one country doesn’t have it, there is a temptation to just offer better wages and skew the competition.

 

I don’t know if it’s even possible, but I’d like to see owners banned from loading the club with personal debt whether that’s as a result of buying them (Man Utd) or loaning for transfers/wages/day to day running (Dave Allen).

 

If mega rich owners want to put their own money in with no expectation of getting it back then fine - we’re apparently operating in a free market economy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, FreshOwl said:


I’m confused as to what people want? The super six is folding, do we expect the fans to just be able to freely kick these owners out? 
 

Just be thankful this moronic idea isn’t happening 

true, its like untangling a spiders web.

 

its in the owners blood to continue to compete for more money, its what they do.

 

and to be (more) competitive in the current climate you need more money.

 

its an arms race thats been out of control for decades.

 

ive not got the answers but its the elephant in the room.  Seems like its sky have decided to ignore it for......reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Big Malc said:

Alternatively - Sky’s remit is to make money via advertising and subscriptions.  They spotted a popular product and bid for it.  The PL decide that each year the product is worth more and Sky have to keep increasing their commitment to secure access.

 

What the PL and individual clubs then do with that money is not the fault of Sky.  Every single one of those 6 clubs with their combined £1.5bn debt chose to spend their money the way they did.  They didn’t have to pay players £250k a week, or an agent £1m to secure a transfer.  But they didn’t want other clubs to get ahead.

 

Sky have provided the funds to improve stadia, facilities and the technical ability of players, and to entice better players from around the world.  The clubs themselves have chosen to get themselves into debt.


Sky charge subscription fees to watch football.

 

They are part of the problem when it comes to huge wages and fees in the game - they’re a vehicle which drive the crazy bidding and money thrown about. They have a day of national coverage dedicated to clubs splashing obscene amount of money around to get the best players so they can get more money in TV rights and more Sky TV exposure.

 

They change kick-off times to suit their broadcast schedule rather than catering to the average fan.

 

So do Sky really care about the average fan? Or do they care about money? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, HIGHERSTATE said:

true, its like untangling a spiders web.

 

its in the owners blood to continue to compete for more money, its what they do.

 

and to be (more) competitive in the current climate you need more money.

 

its an arms race thats been out of control for decades.

 

ive not got the answers but its the elephant in the room.  Seems like its sky have decided to ignore it for......reasons.


The money will always be there. That’s football. In the future we just need the owners to refrain from making stupid decisions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...