Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, @owlstalk said:


 

Anyone attacking Reach when he got announced to play on the right side of central midfield obviously just hates Adam Reach

Can he put a tackle that might hurt a little to prevent a goal? Can he fizz!

He's a fraud. Makes it look like he's working and about to challenge but never quite does so.

Runs about a lot but doesn't graft or put in the last ditch tackles when they are needed.

A lightweight and not what we need now and certainly not in L1 next season.

 

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Left winger Adam Reach in the team.

Right winger Kadeem Harris in the team.

Attacking full back Liam Palmer in the team. 

Attacking full back Matt Penney in the team.

 

Opportunity to get cross in the box for Rhodes. 

 

Nah......

 

Let's go three at the back, sit deep and knock it 30 yards in the air and see if Rhodes can do something with that.

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would Reach start putting tackles in now?

His contract runs out in a few months, why risk injury and make yourself unemployed.

 

Contract should have been sorted out last year or he he should have sold last year.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Blatter said:

The encouraging spell was when he had a little run of games at left wing back. Just where was he supposed to be playing tonight. I don’t think he knew himself.

No team has a wing back that cant tackle. He not had any form since a small purple patch last season. He a player that needs a certain skill set around him otherwise he just gets over powered. The championship is to robust for him. He would be better suited to Dutch league. He deffo a confidence player as someone on here stated

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, @owlstalk said:


 

Adam Reach is not the problem at SWFC

He is one of them. He been really poor recently.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the end of this season Adam Reach will leave, sign for another club either in the Championship or Celtic or Rangers who have both been loosely linked with him. He'll do well, consistent performances and the odd worldie because I'd be stunned that another club could miss-use a player as much as we have with him.

 

I won't deny it looks like he's going through the motions a bit at times this season, can you blame him? I don't think you can. A massive shame as he's a cracking footballer at his best.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, @owlstalk said:


 

Adam Reach is not the problem at SWFC

 

Don't worry, some don't think he is the problem, they prefer to put that on Bannan. Others actually think that Bannan and Reach are the problem!

 

The lack of a challenge for the first goal was poor today regardless of what position he was playing. However, keep putting him in a position he doesn't perform in and it can't be a surprise that he plays poorly, confidence wains and he generally doesn't contribute. 

 

He played well in the win at Wigan on the left. Was poor against Stoke, got dropped against Birmingham then subbed on when we are down to 10 men and then returns to the side tonight in a position that doesn't suit him at all. Why manager after manager chooses to put square pegs in round holes for us is getting beyond belief. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, @owlstalk said:


 

Adam Reach is not the problem at SWFC

Maybe not but he is part of the team that turn out and can’t get a shot on goal, don’t show much enthusiasm to score and at the end of the day no matter how you dress it up end up losing and keep us firmly staring at league 1.

Adam Reach has been a let down for SWFC for a couple of years now.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, bolton9owl said:

Maybe not but he is part of the team that turn out and can’t get a shot on goal, don’t show much enthusiasm to score and at the end of the day no matter how you dress it up end up losing and keep us firmly staring at league 1.

Adam Reach has been a let down for SWFC for a couple of years now.

Ffs so he’s one of a squad / team / management/ ownership / direction/ that we should be complaining about? Utter nonsense in my opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, @owlstalk said:


 

Anyone attacking Reach when he got announced to play on the right side of central midfield obviously just hates Adam Reach

Lack of energy, lack of desire, lack of aggression and lack of effort should not be effected by playing out of position.

 

His body language is terrible.

 

He’s a player who dines out for a dozen or so games on 1 or 2 half decent performances or a hit and hope 30 yarder.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Kew Owl said:

He’s not what you want when you’re in a relegation fight and you need characters that will battle and scrap for the whole 90 minutes.

 

Reach has a habit of going missing in action too many times for my liking

Apart from when he virtually carried the team for a spell under Jos

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, @owlstalk said:


 

Adam Reach is not the problem at SWFC

No, but he is A problem at SWFC.

 

Harping on about him starting out of position doesn't excuse him from not clearing the ball when he had chance.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...