Jump to content

How much more of a team do we look


Recommended Posts

Bannan can play well in a three, it's his positional discipline that can let him down.

It will happen whether he's in a 2, a 3, a 4 or a 5. If the opposition crowd him out he drops deeper and deeper looking for the ball, instead of looking for the space in and around him but it's easier to drop off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, FreshOwl said:

Another genius misinterpreting my original post 

 

Ah come on mate...…………"how much more of a team do we look without Bannan", followed by mentioning his faults (sitting too deep, set pieces etc)...……..is not a dig at Bannan ?

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OwlinOldham said:

One game out of many but it was refreshing to see central midfielders in the attacking third. Bannan is a great player but hes rarely playing where he can do most damage or give the most support. Also helps when we play Borner and Iorfa, they naturally make us play 15 yards further forward with how comfy they are on the ball.

 

You are bang on there mate 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DobbinTheDonkey said:

Bannan can play well in a three, it's his positional discipline that can let him down.

It will happen whether he's in a 2, a 3, a 4 or a 5. If the opposition crowd him out he drops deeper and deeper looking for the ball, instead of looking for the space in and around him but it's easier to drop off.

Anyone notice the midfield not having to go as deep to collect the ball.

 

Can't help feeling Bannan has recently becomes a victim of Iorfa & Borner being split up. (granted due to injury initially)

 

When Borner is playing CB the ball is moved forward at a quicker pace than when Lees is playing. The split seconds extra Lees takes in his decision making costs valuable yards with the result of Bannan having to go deeper to collect the ball. 

 

The midfield today had the luxury of not having to do that, so not totally convinced it is all down to Bannan deliberately playing deep.

 

100% agree though he needs to be further forward.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, sheriwozgod said:

 

Ah come on mate...…………"how much more of a team do we look without Bannan", followed by mentioning his faults (sitting too deep, set pieces etc)...……..is not a dig at Bannan ?

 

he’s a top player (as I said last week) and they key word in my thread title is ‘team’. It’s not an individual attack 

 

some posters just won’t have anything said about Bannan, and will take stuff out of context if they get even a sniff that it might not suit their agenda 

Edited by FreshOwl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FreshOwl said:

Without bannan? :ph34r:

 

not sitting ridiculously deep. Different ideas for set pieces, midfielders in their rightful positions 

 

tin hat on 

You said midfielders in their right full positions inferring that BB couldn’t do that, people rightfully pointed out that the fact that we had A extra midfielder helped with or without BB 

 

that’s why the tin hat is needed 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, hugeowl said:

You said midfielders in their right full positions inferring that BB couldn’t do that, people rightfully pointed out that the fact that we had A extra midfielder helped with or without BB 

 

that’s why the tin hat is needed 

Yeah...because he’s dropping deep all the time. He can still be a good player, but in the current set up he’s doing too much/being coached incorrectly. That’s plain for all to see 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FreshOwl said:

Without bannan? :ph34r:

 

not sitting ridiculously deep. Different ideas for set pieces, midfielders in their rightful positions 

 

tin hat on 

 

Your probably not wrong in terms of todays match however it staggers me that people don't understand that the formation and tactics we play will always yield completely different results because the opposition will always play different formations, systems, players and will also play well or poorly. So in reality we could play exactly this same team and formation and get trounced next week. 

 

It just seems to be something that football fans overlook. No one ever seems to consider you are playing 11 other men, who are set uo to nullify or dominate the way you have lined up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Ferkorf
39 minutes ago, Maddogbob said:

Wba talks. 

Is he Fletchers agent?

Maybe then can take all our scottish lads with them...

Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...