Jump to content

Can we all agree on this one?


Recommended Posts

For me it's how business should be run, man utd did it with the likes of world stars like Beckham, arsenal with cashly Cole etc.. No player is bigger or more important than the club or the team. The club will be there along with the fans long after a player has retired and hung up his boots for good. We the fans will find new heroes in our shirts,thats the way it always has been and always will. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, @owlstalk said:


Following all the stress and strain of last season's transfer / contract issue can we all agree that from now on no matter which player it relates to that if the chairman says that they tried to ask for too much money or hold the club to ransom, that we all back the chairman 100% without exception and no matter which player it is

 

SWFC comes first


If a player needs more than we are willing to pay we simply move them out and find another player


Agree?

 

 

You have the power to ban all those who look to sow dissent by criticising our Chairman yet you don’t, you know most Owls will back you if you do. We can’t let them damage our mighty club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rebowl Yell said:

 

You have the power to ban all those who look to sow dissent by criticising our Chairman yet you don’t, you know most Owls will back you if you do. We can’t let them damage our mighty club.

 


I believe in education not occupation

 


Owlstalk Shop

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, @owlstalk said:


Following all the stress and strain of last season's transfer / contract issue can we all agree that from now on no matter which player it relates to that if the chairman says that they tried to ask for too much money or hold the club to ransom, that we all back the chairman 100% without exception and no matter which player it is

 

SWFC comes first


If a player needs more than we are willing to pay we simply move them out and find another player


Agree?

 

 

Pretty much, but I can't help but think if you pay peanuts you get monkeys, unless you're going to bring the kids through and even that has its risks. Then again, the evidence suggests breaking FFP is worth it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, TINKERBELL said:

No players name on the back of the shirt is bigger than the clubs name on the front. 

At this moment in time I recon that the name or should I say brand of Ronaldo is actually bigger than Juventus football clubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, @owlstalk said:


Following all the stress and strain of last season's transfer / contract issue can we all agree that from now on no matter which player it relates to that if the chairman says that they tried to ask for too much money or hold the club to ransom, that we all back the chairman 100% without exception and no matter which player it is

 

SWFC comes first


If a player needs more than we are willing to pay we simply move them out and find another player


Agree?

 

100%.

(Now that young judd has gone)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, @owlstalk said:


Not really no

If (for example) Forestieri wanted £1000 more per month than our wage structure or he was going to a rival how do you think it would go on social media?

Give him the money but take it off Fox...no net loss then simples

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...