Inspector Lestrade Posted July 13, 2018 Share Posted July 13, 2018 This sentence is false. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bing Cosby Posted July 13, 2018 Share Posted July 13, 2018 2 hours ago, @owlstalk said: Following all the stress and strain of last season's transfer / contract issue can we all agree that from now on no matter which player it relates to that if the chairman says that they tried to ask for too much money or hold the club to ransom, that we all back the chairman 100% without exception and no matter which player it is SWFC comes first If a player needs more than we are willing to pay we simply move them out and find another player Agree? Agreed... So who is asking for more money than we can afford? If you don't tell me, I'll just make something up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted July 13, 2018 Author Share Posted July 13, 2018 Read the Wednesday Pie thread Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Posted July 13, 2018 Share Posted July 13, 2018 the most ironic thing is the op was critising the club for not giving hirst what he wanted got a memory of a goldfish 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pazowl55 Posted July 13, 2018 Share Posted July 13, 2018 Just now, TINKERBELL said: Ronaldo will come and go Juventus will always be there That's why I said at this moment in time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morepork Posted July 13, 2018 Share Posted July 13, 2018 I promise....but only on the proviso that the chairman does not allow himself to be talked in to signing dubious players by unscrupulous advisors!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soldierboyblue Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 9 hours ago, torres said: With the amounts we charge for tickets and shirts our wage bracket should be pretty high Our wage bracket is sky high hence the need to offload a few, we pay more than most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utah Owl Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 9 hours ago, TINKERBELL said: No players name on the back of the shirt is bigger than the clubs name on the front. Have you checked the font sizes recently Tinks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utah Owl Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 8 hours ago, @owlstalk said: I believe in education not occupation Think that translates as he's learning a new video game instead of working! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nevthelodgemoorowl Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 10 hours ago, @owlstalk said: Not really no If (for example) Forestieri wanted £1000 more per month than our wage structure or he was going to a rival how do you think it would go on social media? People letting down the side and the Chairman should face two week suspension in true Stalinist style. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronio Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveger Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 me neither....what was the question about ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronio Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 4 minutes ago, steveger said: .what was the question about ? blind obedience. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danny0wl Posted July 15, 2018 Share Posted July 15, 2018 On 13/07/2018 at 17:42, TINKERBELL said: No players name on the back of the shirt is bigger than the clubs name on the front. Chansiri is the biggest name on the shirt, just saying!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parkfieldowl14 Posted July 15, 2018 Share Posted July 15, 2018 On 13/07/2018 at 16:56, @owlstalk said: Following all the stress and strain of last season's transfer / contract issue can we all agree that from now on no matter which player it relates to that if the chairman says that they tried to ask for too much money or hold the club to ransom, that we all back the chairman 100% without exception and no matter which player it is SWFC comes first If a player needs more than we are willing to pay we simply move them out and find another player Agree? Absolutely. 100% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owl999 Posted July 15, 2018 Share Posted July 15, 2018 On 13/07/2018 at 17:42, TINKERBELL said: No players name on the back of the shirt is bigger than the clubs name on the front. I bet there’s a few that are at Bury Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S36 OWL Posted July 15, 2018 Share Posted July 15, 2018 On 14/07/2018 at 00:49, Morepork said: I promise....but only on the proviso that the chairman does not allow himself to be talked in to signing dubious players by unscrupulous advisors!! Are Doyen still hanging around like a bad smell ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owl At Risk Posted July 15, 2018 Share Posted July 15, 2018 On 13/07/2018 at 18:16, Rebowl Yell said: You have the power to ban all those who look to sow dissent by criticising our Chairman yet you don’t, you know most Owls will back you if you do. We can’t let them damage our mighty club. Are you Mao in disguise? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now