Guest mrbluesky Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 Don't let Eastleigh Owl see this! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG D Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 42 minutes ago, Bluey9 said: Some might not like him, but as far as I'm concerned Nixon is our best shot at getting info at the moment as the club don't seem to be giving much away. He'll have his sources and he won't always be right but at least we get snippets off him. Alan Nixon@reluctantnicko @MightySWFC Want a couple at Watford. But need to decide whether to risk FFP penalties Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG D Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 Not hanging on his every word, just relaying what he's said. Where has he mentioned a fine? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wilyfox Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 Whether we are nearing our FFP limit, I don't know. But, DC was likely to face a financial investment dilemma at some point. Without the resources of teams coming down, was always gonna take big bucks to get us up in the near future. He's done half a job; finish it, or we stop where we are. You can't bank on overachieving. Occasionally it happens, as with Burnley, but it's very difficult. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigrbuk Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 8 minutes ago, S_W_F_C said: Stop hanging on this blokes every word he is speaking complete balls. The penalty is an embargo. Not a fine that is not an option. Ask yourself this. Are the FL going to fine a club they are stating have already spent to much. Fines only apply, like Bournemouth, to teams that break the rules but go up. Nixon genuinely has no idea about FFP. IF they get promoted, it's a fine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theowlsman Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 Kevn Phillips and Luther Blissett Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReluctantNicko Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 (edited) It's so simple; 1 Play by the rules and spend limited money = not much chance of promotion. OR 2 Break the rules, spend what DC wants = good chance of promotion and SMALL fine if PL is reached/possible chance of staying in Championship followed by nasty transfer embargo to put the club back wit the likes of Forest, Fulham and Leeds (or worse like Bolton). Edited July 25, 2016 by ReluctantNicko Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
modboy Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 how long do embargos last for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BRADFIELDOWLS Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 Guys, Nixon's been doing this many years with several different papers so he's clearly no mug. But he's still no doubt used by clubs for their own ends and we seem to be talking down prices at present, by raising FFP now and last week CC suggesting we are skint (which he did before a couple of signings last season ). Lack of Championship player moves suggests even relegated clubs won't pay these daft asking prices. But soon the dominos will fall. And anyway, aren't we already much stronger just by Fletcher's capture - even without a natural left -back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daveyboy66 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 1 minute ago, S_W_F_C said: Until such times that you can get your books to balance in order to comply with the rules. I think one of the teams were 2 or 3 transfer windows. Should that happen forget promotion and expect our better players to ask to leave. It would be an unmitigated disaster and if DC allows that to happen he is an idiot (but he won't I'm sure of that) Not another unmitigated disaster...look what happened to the last one when we signed CC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
modboy Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 do you HAVE to sell a player though? Cant remember any clubs been forced to sell their assets of cheap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
modboy Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 BUT in theory couldnt you build an amazing core squad and take the embargo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Road Runner Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 If Chansiri spent the money like alot want, and we end up in a embargo with fines. People will go crazy saying back to square one, massive debt and we screwed and its Chansiri fault. If we dont spend, Chansiri no ambition we will struggle all talk no action, boring and he wants out etc etc..... The bloke can't win either way, if spending guarantees promtion he would spend. Life aint like that though, he's being prudent and making sure we don't fall foul to it and end up like Bolton, Forest, Blackburn. Good on him too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonny Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 24 minutes ago, modboy said: do you HAVE to sell a player though? Cant remember any clubs been forced to sell their assets of cheap You don't have to but you'll come out of the embargo quicker if you do. Forest hung on to Antonio etc thinking they already had a good enough team to ride out the embargo. Turned out they got a load of injuries but couldn't get anyone decent in to replace them before being forced to sell Antonio anyway. An embargo would be really bad. If you're not refreshing your squad then you're standing still waiting for a shït hand to be dealt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbob 13 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 9 minutes ago, S_W_F_C said: Spot on great point. Remember what Milan said about DC. He would spend reasonably and so far he has. Id rather stay in the championship but always be towards the top end than end up back in mid to lower table Re-name Hillsborough the TUF Stadium before we get an embargo for me. It's Thai union Group now so would be Tug stadium which just doesn't sound right on many levels Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eastleigh Owl Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 45 minutes ago, modboy said: how long do embargos last for? i think a 12 month one can last for 2 years or more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matthefish2002 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 Sorry if discussed before but with our 3 year season tickets our season ticket income money will only be about half next season. This I presume will effect our FFP. What happens if we don't go up this season? Will we have to cut back on the playing staff next season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swfc4_sufc0 Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 12 minutes ago, matthefish2002 said: Sorry if discussed before but with our 3 year season tickets our season ticket income money will only be about half next season. This I presume will effect our FFP. What happens if we don't go up this season? Will we have to cut back on the playing staff next season? The income from a 3-year season ticket is spread over 3 years in the accounts. We are creditors of the club, which is why they could not be bought with a credit card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oh_weds_we_love_you Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 May have been covered in the 12 pages, but what are these "FFP penalties"? Isn't FFP based over 3 years and we are only 1 year into it? So, surely any punishment wouldn't come into force for another 2 years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
victorturner Posted July 25, 2016 Share Posted July 25, 2016 On 24 July 2016 at 09:24, dfoster said: I can't believe that some fans seem to be suggesting that we should ignore potential major fines and a transfer embargo just to remedy their impatience for mass spending. fletcher, hooper, FF, bannan, lees, hunt and Westwood must all be on absolutely top end champ money .... Not to mention Joao, Matias, Wallace, McGugan, Hutch .... And don't forget that before we started signing (or giving new contracts to) players of that ilk, MM was susbsidising the club for 5m a year i reckon thay that bunch must have added at least 12m a year on to wage bill then there's the 10m plus spent on transfer fees We must be currently running at a loss of AT LEAST ten million a year - which clearly Chansiri is happy to cover. but look at the damage caused to Forest and Blackburn by an embargo? Chansiri is 100% correct to do this properly, even it that means it takes another year or two to get back up On 16 July 2016 at 16:01, Orlando_Trustful said: Three weeks to go. Time to get a move on. Time to move on some players who hardly play and when they do they are hopeless. Look at the players who played away at Shrewsbury and Bristol C and make some hard decisions which however are urgently needed. We have a squad heavy on numbers light on quality and something has to change for this team to finish above halfway up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now