Popular Post SheffWed Posted March 16 Popular Post Share Posted March 16 They can’t be on the pitch at the same time, it’s one or the other. They are still young, but there is a lot of naivety with them, lose the ball far too easily, defensively not great, when they are bad they are really bad. 12 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
debram Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 1 minute ago, SheffWed said: They can’t be on the pitch at the same time, it’s one or the other. They are still young, but there is a lot of naivety with them, lose the ball far too easily, defensively not great, when they are bad they are really bad. Which is most of the time, not team players just selfish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyQuinnsQuiff Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 I’ve got some news for you….when the teams bad….they’re really bad!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanchez_Jenks Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Explains the position we're in and the shocking decision making the club has made. We're desperately reliant on young kids to do what they're miles off ready to do every week 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oneeyedmilkman Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Odd choice to have both and poveda playing today. Not the reason we lost, but their left back had the freedom of ipswich all day 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prendo's boots Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 It's always been either/or for me give one the first half and the other the second so the press and tracking back (in theory!!!!) can be kept up! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnsleyowl1996 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Not helped by a real weak midfield, they are both talents but nowhere near finished article , their end products are both very inconsistent. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zorbatheowl Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Neither offered the full backs any cover. Away from home its too much of a luxury. They also gave no service to Ike. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areNOTwhatTHEYseem Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 24 minutes ago, Sanchez_Jenks said: Explains the position we're in and the shocking decision making the club has made. We're desperately reliant on young kids to do what they're miles off ready to do every week Exactly. Gassama and Musaba are both talented players, but they're very raw, inconsistent, and still getting fully up to speed with English football. They're the kind of players you want to drop in and out of the staring XI as form permits whilst they develop further; not to be first team regulars who you have to rely on week in, week out. But needs must. We didn't recruit anyone better in the summer, and we didn't add further reinforcements in January either. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreshOwl Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 They’re gonna be inconsistent for a while. We’ve talked about this on here until the cows come home Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deano Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 40 minutes ago, SheffWed said: They can’t be on the pitch at the same time, it’s one or the other. They are still young, but there is a lot of naivety with them, lose the ball far too easily, defensively not great, when they are bad they are really bad. Agreed, many people have said the same thing, one or the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A E Neuman NYowl Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 I don't know if it was tactical but both players today played as if they had no defensive responsibilities. Normally Gazzama is not great defensively but at least shows some effort. Musaba does at least track back normally. Today Iorfa and Johnson were no offered no protection and were totally outnumbered time and time again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrickyTrev Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Musaba will be a better footballer when he learns how to control a football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meggoisgod Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 39 minutes ago, Barnsleyowl1996 said: Not helped by a real weak midfield, they are both talents but nowhere near finished article , their end products are both very inconsistent. Agreed, if they had Morsy and Luongo behind them they'd look like world beaters 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kew Owl Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 31 minutes ago, zorbatheowl said: Neither offered the full backs any cover. Away from home its too much of a luxury. They also gave no service to Ike. Agreed, the work rate of both of them is just not good enough. Just can’t neglect defensive responsibilities, especially away from home 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wens-Dee Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 36 minutes ago, meggoisgod said: Agreed, if they had Morsy and Luongo behind them they'd look like world beaters Very much disagree. I don’t see any situation ever where Musaba looks like a world beater. Truly awful player!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4evaowl Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 It’s the 4-2-3-1 formation, not them per se. It doesn’t work for us. DR has to find a way of stopping us getting overrun and two in midfield hasn’t worked all season. I personally favour 3-5-2 but his version of a 5-2-2-1 has worked much better than 4-2-3-1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Given the injuries today both are going to have a big role go play in whether we stay up or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hirstys_12th_Pint Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 1 hour ago, Barnsleyowl1996 said: Not helped by a real weak midfield, they are both talents but nowhere near finished article , their end products are both very inconsistent. That is the key point. Midfield of Bannan and Vaulks keeping shop while the young uns attack. Always going to end in tears. Need prime Sammy Hutch or that young Aussie Fella from Ipswich in there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnsleyowl1996 Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 16 hours ago, Hirstys_12th_Pint said: That is the key point. Midfield of Bannan and Vaulks keeping shop while the young uns attack. Always going to end in tears. Need prime Sammy Hutch or that young Aussie Fella from Ipswich in there. Yep it’s not ideal having to pick the ball up in your own half , running 40 yards just to get towards the other box , for example Hutchinson at Ipswich was getting the ball in better situations I’d argue due to his midfield being on the front foot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now