Jump to content

Harris


Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, gurujuan said:

Well I hadn’t seen that stat. With only three assists, that’s pretty wasteful from the people ahead. Who has been missing all these chances then, Nuhiu, Rhodes, Winnall and Forestieri, have only had peripheral roles, so maybe Fletcher?


Difference between scoring opportunities and genuine chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BarnsleyOwl96 said:

Be interesting to see a video of the 27 missed chances to see how good the service was from Harris 

Indeed.

 

That stat is pretty meaningless unless you know how they tally it up.

 

We talking clear cut chances or mishmash of clear and half chances? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ellis Rimmer said:

I for one am sick of seeing wingers that cut inside at SWFC. It's ok at the top level, but it's not for us.

Thing is *Khads* doesn't usually cut inside.

 

He prefers to try and cross on his left rather than work it onto his right.

 

Nothing wrong with being able to use his left foot, but I swear there was a game recently where he was playing on the right and trying to cut in on his left :duntmatter:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Put 2 men on Harris when he gets the ball and he struggles. He needs help. If we got players closer to him they could either draw players away or give him a pass option. If he's out there on his own his only chance is to beat 2 men.

 

Give the guy half a yard and he can do his stuff unless the FB is faster than him. If that's the case forget it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, prowl said:

Put 2 men on Harris when he gets the ball and he struggles. He needs help. If we got players closer to him they could either draw players away or give him a pass option. If he's out there on his own his only chance is to beat 2 men.

 

Give the guy half a yard and he can do his stuff unless the FB is faster than him. If that's the case forget it.

This is where you need a FB who can get beyond the wide player.

 

Help create an overload.

 

Fox is solid, but he is very much a defender first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, SiJ said:

He's just not very good. 

 

Has his moments, but I'm bemused at how highly regarded he is by some on here. 

 

Decent cross in the first half for the Reach chance, but that was your lot today. 

 

A chance we should have scored from, our best opportunity of the game. Also broke to win a free-kick in a great position in the 2nd half which we did nothing from. 

 

It isn't much of a return from 60 minutes or so I grant you but he created our best chance of the game so what does that say about everyone else?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, hirstyboywonder said:

 

A chance we should have scored from, our best opportunity of the game. Also broke to win a free-kick in a great position in the 2nd half which we did nothing from. 

 

It isn't much of a return from 60 minutes or so I grant you but he created our best chance of the game so what does that say about everyone else?

 

Not a great deal.

 

Are we saying that Harris is the best of a bad bunch? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, BarnsleyOwl96 said:

Be interesting to see a video of the 27 missed chances to see how good the service was from Harris 

 

A fair few of the chances he created in the first half of the season led to goals or good saves, when he had a striker worth his salt on the end of them. Yesterday he created an opportunity that attacking players thrive upon, Reach met it with a header that failed to trouble the keeper. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SiJ said:

Not a great deal.

 

Are we saying that Harris is the best of a bad bunch? 

 

If reach scores, which he should do we could walk away with a 1-0 win thanks to a fine cross from Harris.

 

He has looked a bit burnt out recently, he hasn't played as much competitive football as he has done this season for a while. Got to remember that unless the team is set up to counter attack, wingers/wide midfielders need the team to be playing in the opposition half with intent in order to be effective regularly. A midfield of Bannan and Pelupessy do not provide that opportunity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hirstyboywonder said:

 

A fair few of the chances he created in the first half of the season led to goals or good saves, when he had a striker worth his salt on the end of them. Yesterday he created an opportunity that attacking players thrive upon, Reach met it with a header that failed to trouble the keeper. 


fair point mate , Fletcher would have buried that header reach missed yesterday 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reach has several assists (on the left where he has played far too little) from good 1st time left footed balls in, after making a clever run behind the rb giving cb's no time to get in position.

 

Harris never seems to do this, he wants to run with it from deeper for longer but is predictable, often running into trouble with the rb and gives cb's time to prepare, making it very hard to create anything.

 

He doesn't even put anything in on his stronger right either for some reason.

Murphys not great at crossing either, so they have less assists between them than reach, only 3 in 50 odd apps.

 

Reach doesnt need to beat a man unlike harris or murphy who rarely put 1st time balls in.

 

We're clearly struggling in the final 3rd so with new signings available and ff back, its time to try a new front 3 with harris and murphy benched imo

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...