McRightSide

No you are correct, just imagine it with quotation marks around it

Well it’s not the club since I also said ‘the club’ ...but you neglected to mention that part.

Incorrect. Correct.

Very strange poster

That reads a bit more of an anti-Pulis rant than anything else...although I can’t say I disagree with what you say, I do think there are a couple of viable options to Bullen. That said, I’m personally quite comfortable with him in the role at the moment

I don’t think this is the worst idea in the world, but I would imagine we’d have heard a couple of rumours if something was going to happen

Thank you. I guess your lack of answer answers my question.

Threats and name calling...hilarious. Oh, and still no answer from you...

Err, I said no you sausage. Seems like you’re avoid my question... Admit it, you thought I was talking about the club and not SYP didn’t you? Night Cookie.

Ok Piers...you can chill out too. The answer is right there. I believe the justice system we have, so if the courts exonerated us then I would say ‘no’ But again, why are you even asking? I never said that I thought the club did... Read my reply a few posts down from the original one.

I believe we were exonerated in a court of law, no? why?

It was an emotional response to the situation and regardless of the feeling I thought it might be a bit insensitive to say that SYP have blood on their hands...so I changed my mind about posting it.

Or it doesn’t fit their agenda...and they know that it’s extremely difficult to argue against public safety. I mean, I’ve read hundreds of comments on here saying it’s unsafe...so they’ll just go ‘ok...less numbers then = more safety”

It should, yes. But thats not how agendas work...

It doesn’t matter though, it gives them an angle to drive the agenda. Prohibition Notice changes how fans exit > fans exit different way and complain how dangerous it is > capacity reduced even further until that next problem is solved