Jump to content

James Garner


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, beswetherick said:

 

Henriksen, Irvine and Stewart are all still available on frees after leaving Hull. Marcus Maddison still hasn’t been picked up either which I’m quite surprised by 


Not bad ideas, if they’d accept a one year contract or reduced terms.  

 

The midfield 3 of Bannan, Brown and Luongo are likely to be the main guys anyway so whoever else we get in may be playing sub for a lot of the time 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Owls-Fan said:


Not bad ideas, if they’d accept a one year contract or reduced terms.  

 

The midfield 3 of Bannan, Brown and Luongo are likely to be the main guys anyway so whoever else we get in may be playing sub for a lot of the time 

 

I think there’ll be quite a lot of squad rotation though with the games coming thick and fast as well as the usual injuries, suspensions etc. I agree that our first choice midfield is decent but our back ups are Hunt (really exciting prospect but still young), FDB (very raw) and Joey (not good enough). Another quality CM would take some of the pressure off the young lads and also keep Joey further away from the starting XI. 

 

I know he’s recently started pinging crosses in like Beckham but I wonder if Liam Palmer could be an option in defensive midfield if needed. He’s played in midfield before and I thought he did ok at centre half last season. We’ve got Harris, Odubajo and we’re being linked with Sanderson for the RWB spot, and if Reach can be repurposed as a centre forward then it doesn’t seem too outlandish...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Triple O said:

 

 

Howson talking bolloc*s again.

 

Garner is nothing like Brown. They are totally different types of players with different set of qualities.

 

One plays in front of back line while other plays behind front two.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, malek said:

 

Howson talking bolloc*s again.

 

Garner is nothing like Brown. They are totally different types of players with different set of qualities.

 

One plays in front of back line while other plays behind front two.

 

 

Perhaps the original idea was for Garner Infront of the back line and Luongo behind the front two?

Edited by Anthndav
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, malek said:

 

Howson talking bolloc*s again.

 

Garner is nothing like Brown. They are totally different types of players with different set of qualities.

 

One plays in front of back line while other plays behind front two.

 

 

They are different, but, perhaps the choice was either play Garner anchor and push Luongo forward, or sign Brown for the attacking role and sit Luongo. I'm happy with our choice. Think Izzy will be very influential for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wilyfox said:

 

They are different, but, perhaps the choice was either play Garner anchor and push Luongo forward, or sign Brown for the attacking role and sit Luongo. I'm happy with our choice. Think Izzy will be very influential for us.

 

I also much prefer Brown to Garner.

 

But than again I think we need player like Garner in front of our back line, rather than Luongo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, malek said:

 

I also much prefer Brown to Garner.

 

But than again I think we need player like Garner in front of our back line, rather than Luongo.


fair enough, but I rate Luongo. I like the Bannan-Brown-Luongo trio. I also feel with loans it’s better to target those who could potentially stay beyond if they do well. I see that possibility with Brown, but not with Garner. Every chance he has a future at Man Utd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Owls-Fan said:


Not bad ideas, if they’d accept a one year contract or reduced terms.  

 

The midfield 3 of Bannan, Brown and Luongo are likely to be the main guys anyway so whoever else we get in may be playing sub for a lot of the time 

I think over a season we want one more experienced CM (Pelupussy should be used for cup games and in case of covering suspension and injuries and not a regularly squad rotation player, if he starts more then 15-20 games this season we are in bother) Like Irvine and Stewart from that list most 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...