Jump to content

Starting line up as it stands?


Recommended Posts

Wow some people are getting tetchy. It’s a fair enough thread OP so don’t listen to the people full of hate. I agree that’s the team as it stands but do hope (and believe) that we will see more new faces in the coming days and weeks. 
 

Be kind to fellow owls. The world is crap enough as it is right now without us tearing strips off each other. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Utah Owl said:

Oh dear, someone has Covid fever and is getting all angrymad!

 

Also, you probably didn't see my edit!

 

Chill dude!

 

Basically I dived in feet first without reading the thread or title properly and ended up with one of said feet in my big gob!

 

Oh dear silly me! Satisfied, or do I need to take that slice of humble pie with a dollop of cream as well?

 

lol


I’m not angrymad covid fever, but yours was one of many derogatory posts to a relatively new posters new thread. Unlike the others though, you’re a longtime poster that people respect. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, CalmJimmers said:

4231

 

Dawson

 

Iorfa

Borner

Dunkley

Penney

 

Bannan

Luongo

 

Harris

Brown

Reach

 

Rhodes

 

Get in a LB and a ST and it's not a bad starting line up. Would need depth but it's a start. 

This looks better.

 

Two strikers another winger DM player and we’re ok. Gonna be a big ask to stay up tho if the -12 stands 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Philb125 said:


I’m not angrymad covid fever, but yours was one of many derogatory posts to a relatively new posters new thread. Unlike the others though, you’re a longtime poster that people respect. 

 

I always thought most of the new accounts were Neil's

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Philb125 said:


I’m not angrymad covid fever, but yours was one of many derogatory posts to a relatively new posters new thread. Unlike the others though, you’re a longtime poster that people respect. 

Which is why I held my hand up and admitted I hadn't read the title (or the thread) properly.

 

Sorry if I upset or offended anyone.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, dykwim said:

Personally, I’d have us in a classic 4-4-3 formation. 

Same here.... And if we get away with that I'd go even further and try to sneak another extra player on. Might help with the relegation battle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Pressman 1 said:

As it stands, with brown signing think so far be roughly like this 

                      Wildsmith 

      Iorfa        dunkley       borner   

Harris                                            reach 

             Bannan  luongo bashiru 

                                   Brown 

                       Rhodes 

 

What do you all think so far? 

                                    

No lube required

:duntmatter:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suppose we don’t know yet how Monk intends to set up. Pretty certain it won’t be 4-4-2, as Bannan and Brown would be ineffective in a two, so any system that incorporates three in the middle. Will we have a strike pairing, or wide attackers, or maybe even someone like Windass, behind a single striker. 
Has Dunkley been signed to give us greater depth, or will he start in a three at the back, we just don’t know yet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Kagoshimaowl

I don’t get why people keep putting teams out with a back 4. It’s plainly obvious that it will be 3 centre backs, especially with the signing of Dunkley. Prefer 4–3-3 myself but it isn’t happening. People need to get used to it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...