Sonny Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 3 minutes ago, Anlaby Owl said: What debt? I haven't seen anything from the club or the EFL saying we are in debt. We overspent on the EFLs rules but as far as i can tell though the club is running at a defecit, this has been covered entirely by its owner. Indeed from what has been made public mr chansiri is far from on the bones of his bum. The accounts state that we’re in debt to Chansiri. So he loans us the money and we owe it to him. Not a problem whilst ever he’s the owner and is in no hurry for it back. It’s still debt though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorian gray Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 3 hours ago, HillsboroughOwlNI said: Don’t think we’ll need to spend much to bring in a few improvements. Our league position will be attractive to both clubs and players when considering loans. Both want the experience of “success”, rather than fighting relegation/midtable. our surrendering of points due to our lack of game control, feeble attack without fletcher, perhaps a goalkeeping requirement, and a fat squad 'a number' of whom are of no use, suggests IF it's 'shitorbust' and it's looking that way, then we'll be in need of more than 'a few'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobness Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwellOwl Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 We don’t need to go crazy, we just need to play the loan market well. 3-4 to give us a boost and clear a few out too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANDY Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S36 OWL Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 47 minutes ago, djorkaeff said: Wow. We need to turn into Chelski in January and do a Bournemouth or wolves. shopping list Kennedy (Chelsea) Kodja (Villa) Willock (Arsenal) Brewster (Liverpool) Brewster would cost millions 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SallyCinnamon Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 Blimey that response from the EFL. We are not winning this and they are going to hammer us for fighting it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted December 27, 2019 Author Share Posted December 27, 2019 EFL RESPONSE Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S36 OWL Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 3 minutes ago, ANDY said: The EFL tho 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo Bonvin Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 1 minute ago, @owlstalk said: EFL RESPONSE So basically each side is saying the other one is talking rounduns. I can still see this going only one way though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essix Blue Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 3 minutes ago, SallyCinnamon said: Blimey that response from the EFL. We are not winning this and they are going to hammer us for fighting it. my thoughts also Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essix Blue Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 2 minutes ago, 2roland2 said: Multiple, don’t like that word, well not in this context anyhow. 3 people have been charged. That’s multiple charges Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SallyCinnamon Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 Just now, Essix Blue said: my thoughts also Said from the start they wouldn’t have pressed charges unless they knew we had broke the rules. Too much at stake for them. It’s a strong statement from the league. ‘Multiple charges’ and ‘entirely without merit’ makes you gulp. To me our statements are just us trying to prolong the inevitable for as long as possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo Bonvin Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 7 minutes ago, ANDY said: Quelle surprise. The first reply to Staton’s tweet is from a pig. Well, who’d have thought? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ferkorf Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 33 minutes ago, dorian gray said: our surrendering of points due to our lack of game control, feeble attack without fletcher, perhaps a goalkeeping requirement, and a fat squad 'a number' of whom are of no use, suggests IF it's 'shitorbust' and it's looking that way, then we'll be in need of more than 'a few'. Yet still 4th in league.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Costello 77 Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 This is what happens when a private company run the business using quasi legal terms and then run into the actual law of the land... I've warned about this numerous times before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S36 OWL Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 6 minutes ago, SallyCinnamon said: Blimey that response from the EFL. We are not winning this and they are going to hammer us for fighting it. The EFL are just sticking their chest out trying to play tough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SallyCinnamon Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 (edited) 1 minute ago, S36 OWL said: The EFL are just sticking their chest out trying to play tough. And so are we. But I know who I’m backing to win this. And it’s not us. Edited December 27, 2019 by SallyCinnamon 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 4 hours ago, marshy said: Spending unwisely got us in this situation. Smart recruitment needed. Could the EFL put us in an Embargo on Jan 1st? Just to p1ss us off? Not unless the charge is settled, and there's no date for a hearing yet is there? Its good news Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inspector Lestrade Posted December 27, 2019 Share Posted December 27, 2019 1 minute ago, SallyCinnamon said: Said from the start they wouldn’t have pressed charges unless they knew we had broke the rules. Too much at stake for them. It’s a strong statement from the league. ‘Multiple charges’ and ‘entirely without merit’ makes you gulp. To me our statements are just us trying to prolong the inevitable for as long as possible. So are you implying that they would have pressed charges if we hadn't broken the rules? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now