Jokanovic Anyone.

[room0035]

1 hour ago, DELUDED OWL said:

Does that mean Westwood aint going to sign for Stoke then. 

We shall have to wait and see. 

 

Jokanovic is a proven Championship manager he has two promotion on his cv and plays an attractive style of football. A former premiership team relegated last season not doing at well as they would have hoped is going to look at other options if come January they are still not top 6. Thats football.

 

Do I think Jack Butland will be looking for a move in January if Stoke are not top 6. Yes I do think Stoke will be looking for a quality keeper at this level they can get as a replacement and as their manager has tried to sign Westwood in the past I will be surprised if he does not again. We will find out in the next few months. But maybe DC won't allow the sale like he did in the summer because of his importance to the team - I mean he has made no appearances so far this season, no appearance on the bench and basically never been involved in any game and so far this has cost the club £400,000 for 20 weeks of wages. So a great bit of squad management by those in charge. its not like we have P&S issues or anything and £400,000 whats that in the scheme of things anyway.

[MysticOwl]

2 minutes ago, jonesy87shef said:

 

They spent £80m across 4 players. Only signed one championship player and got in some quality loans. 

 

You've now changed your argument to big in volume. They have spent big. 

 

I’m actually a tad embarrassed I keep biting. 

 

Read this carefully and do the math please..

 

Fulham get 150m a season....

 

I have previously said they signed 2-3 big players and the rest were not PL level. 

 

I have also said spending above £200m plus is what is needed so lets say £20m a player. 10 outfield players needed whilst a goalkeeper for the PL wouldnt need to cost £20m. 

 

Top championship players are priced at £15m if you go by Reach and Fessi so you can ignore any price tag below £15m and loanees as if these players were any good they wouldnt be out on loan. 

 

Fulham have not spent big this summer. If you add the 14 additions and perhaps more in January, they will get relegated and would have spent their entire 150m and only shown 3 big signings for it. 

 

It is like making a music album with 3 hit singles and the rest are filler songs. 

[Bluesteel]

He’d be exciting, but whether he’s a man to motivate and cultivate something from less than he’s used to I’m not so sure?

[MysticOwl]

14 minutes ago, bradowl said:

 

They only spent £100m  https://www.football.london/fulham-fc/every-word-fulham-boss-slavisa-15014982

 

But look at the calibre they got for it and look where they are in the league. 

[York_Owl]

Great thread.  I can now explain to my wife that I haven't actually spent big on hookers.

[swfcjack27]

1 hour ago, andytrig said:

He's not English or ginger so that'll be a no from a fair few on here.

[outlaw pete]

He spent £100 million in the close season and has yet to win a game.

Considering we have not got 10p to spend.

He is not the man for S6.

[Groundhopping Owl]

I'd have him here but I doubt he'd come, there are probably more lucrative job offers waiting for him.

[markowl]

"Do the math"

 

[Big Jack]

Jos aint going nowhere at the moment so an endless list of managers names wont make any difference. He is here for the season, we will have 

 

to lump it for the time being.

 

[MysticOwl]

When did buying big ever mean buying championship level players?

 

I mean duhhhh

[pazowl55]

3 minutes ago, outlaw pete said:

He spent £100 million in the close season and has yet to win a game.

Considering we have not got 10p to spend.

He is not the man for S6.

Correct as games against Burnley do not count.

[RichieB]

9 minutes ago, BRADDO said:

It would be an excellent, sensible and ambitious appointment. Sadly, this is precisely why it won't happen. The club is a basket case. 

 

This. 

 

Slavisa Jokanovic would be an excellent appointment but it won't happen. Why on earth would DC have any interest in a proven promotion winner who plays attacking entertaining football (in our league) when he can stick with a manager who is boring everyone to tears. 

 

 

[Costello 77]

39 minutes ago, Lord Snooty said:

Out of work manager

Out of work for a reason. 

Got the boot from his last job.

Foreign 

 

Etc etc

Not many in this thread have questioned whether he'd touch us with a bargepole..if he had access to it I'm fairly certain we'd be able to hear him laughing his co*k off from outer space.

[LiamAP22D]

1 hour ago, CF83OWL said:

 

They didnt bring in 12 players though did they which shows you the calibre of player they actually brought in. 

 

Stop looking at the £100m price tag and look who he actually bought with the money. 

 

Fulham spent £100m but didnt get much more than a Championsip team. 

THEY SIGNED A WORLD CUP WINNER LOL 

[MysticOwl]

1 minute ago, LiamAP22D said:

THEY SIGNED A WORLD CUP WINNER LOL 

 

And they have 6 loan players....

 

Not exactly gonna set the league on fire with loan players are they. 

[LiamAP22D]

1 minute ago, CF83OWL said:

 

And they have 6 loan players....

 

Not exactly gonna set the league on fire with loan players are they. 

They'll stay up! they'll score enough goals.

[SiJ]

So if Fulham had spent 100 million on two players then this would be *big spending*, but because they spent 100 million on 10 odd players, this does not amount to *big spebding*...despite having spent more than nearly everyone in the Premier League. 

 

[Groundhopping Owl]

10 minutes ago, outlaw pete said:

He spent £100 million in the close season and has yet to win a game.

Considering we have not got 10p to spend.

He is not the man for S6.

They beat Burnley 4-2 early on.

[SiJ]

It's a well known fact that no loan player has ever - in the history of the universe - been any good.