Sergeant Tibbs Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 5 minutes ago, StudentOwl said: And if all the other blokes in the world suddenly dropped dead I'd be able to sleep with Cara Delevingne But here we are. If all the other blokes in the world were to decease, you're chances with Cara wouldn't be enhanced. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Chow Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 Would be surprised if we got 14m but this day and age anything is possible, money talks and if this team really wants him they will pay what it takes to get ff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevie snerklebox Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 52 minutes ago, sheriwozgod said: We need at least one sizable sale to enable us to keep trading...…………...but how much of the fee would be ours and how much might be owed to "someone else" Am I correct in assuming that you have also read the Football Leaks article? Worrying times mate and no mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vulture_squadron Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 No harm in asking high. If a deal is reached it should mean a higher comprimise. It was reported DC wanted 20m for him last year so there is some consideration for age / injury. No idea what the hole in our finances is but you'd have thought anything over 10m would be good business. Provided a replacement (ideally young with resale value) can be brought in of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Tibbs Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 6 minutes ago, Belfast Owl 2 said: Apart from end of last season and this season. This season ? Mans the end of last - a couple of good goals in games with no meaning. Think back to his first season here. That player is history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davey_wells Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 I'm all for putting prices high so we can at least negotiate a decent deal... but there arent many teams going to be interested at all at that rate. But lets plough on with Club 1867 hey? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
camffiti Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 42 minutes ago, owls maniac said: Fans need to reconcile themselves with the fact we have to flog players in order to avoid embargo and give SB the best chance to reshape the team. So we have to stop this pathetic sentimental attachment to players, particularly those who have not consistently featured for the last 2 years. Agree, but not no ... Snapping their hands off for half the price and driving him there myself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james o connor Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 1 hour ago, Manchester_Owl said: Here we go again. Every. Single. Season. Do not sell him. He's out best player. Sell Reach/Bannan first if must. He’s been a real gem the last three seasons . We’d be stuffed without him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawksmore Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 26 minutes ago, StudentOwl said: And if all the other blokes in the world suddenly dropped dead I'd be able to sleep with Cara Delevingne But here we are. Ah another stupid post from the resident copy and paste expert. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StudentOwl Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 2 minutes ago, hawksmore said: Ah another stupid post from the resident copy and paste expert. Copy and paste expert... what does that even mean? Oh, and post not poster is the rule, isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawksmore Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 29 minutes ago, vulva said: Better? Definitely worth more, will have a better career and if you asked every Championship side who they’d pick, vast majority would pick Reach. Yes better, who do you think when both fit is the better of the two? 27 minutes ago, pazowl55 said: What happened when Lee was fit, Forestieri was fit. ?? Reach went left back, every manager we have had has fit him into the team somewhere. The reason no one is bidding 14m for Reach is probably because they know that won't buy him. And taking everything into consideration it would probably buy two Forestieri's at this current time. Do you think Reach is a good left back? Is that his best position? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bouncing Owl Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 Forestieri is a player when fit is worth around £15m. However, given his injury record over the last 2 seasons, we aren’t going to get anywhere near that. No club would pay it. We may get £7/8m but that would still represent a big gamble for a club. Unless, we get silly money, I’d keep him and see what Bruce gets out of him. I’m hoping Reach scores a screamer today and a club comes in with a £12m plus offer. It would be good for us and the player to aid his development. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawksmore Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 Just now, StudentOwl said: Copy and paste expert... what does that even mean? Oh, and post not poster is the rule, isn't it? It means your knowledge is lacking, what you post it is often rehashed fence sitting googled tripe. As per the 'rules' then, the content of your post is ballax. Do you even go to the games? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Costello 77 Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 2 minutes ago, StudentOwl said: Copy and paste expert... what does that even mean? Oh, and post not poster is the rule, isn't it? F*ck off StudentOwl. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deano Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 Would depend on the structure of the deal, perhaps 10m fee with 4m if they stay in Prem/get promoted. Headline figures can be a little misleading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ka58 Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Manchester_Owl said: Take this view point. Look at where we are in the league, in the time you claim Reach and Bannan have been prominent. Look at where we finished in league when FF was prominent. Look at the end of last season when FF came back from injury. Look at that free kick against Preston, look at how we looked more of a threat when he was in the pitch. Look at the excitement in the crowd. Bannan and Reach do not offer us what FF offer us. Bananan is also prone to injury. Now I'm not advocating to sell them, but I would sell them above FF any day of the week. Have always been a fan but he hardly ever plays. Would take 14million pence never mind pounds. get him off the wage bill and bring someone in who we can get 35+ games out of every season instead of 20 scatters over 2 seasons. Edited January 27, 2019 by ka58 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Costello 77 Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 Just now, ka58 said: He hardly ever plays. Would take 14million pence never mind pounds. get him off the wage bill and bring someone in who we can get 35+ games out of every season instead of 20 scatters over 2 seasons. Pence.. there's a word you don't see much these days... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Costello 77 Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 2 minutes ago, Costello 77 said: F*ck off StudentOwl. Mods must be putting the yorkshires in... I haven't been bounced......yet 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StudentOwl Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 Just now, hawksmore said: It means your knowledge is lacking, what you post it is often rehashed fence sitting googled tripe. As per the 'rules' then, the content of your post is ballax. Do you even go to the games? 1. When I want to fact-check I google it... when I'm not fact-checking I promise you I don't open another tab... I don't have time to google before I post every time, crikey. 2. The "point" of my post is that just because Reach wouldn't be playing if all those players were fit is immaterial, because those players aren't fit. You can only play who is available. 3. Nope, I haven't been to a game in a very long time. Mixture of the pains of unemployment (now fortunately ceased), high cost of attendance and apathy for the direction (both literally and with the various schemes) the club is going under DC don't enthuse me to wanting to go either. I've made little attempt to hide that fact either. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawksmore Posted January 27, 2019 Share Posted January 27, 2019 1 minute ago, Costello 77 said: Mods must be putting the yorkshires in... I haven't been bounced......yet Reported 1 minute ago, StudentOwl said: 1. When I want to fact-check I google it... when I'm not fact-checking I promise you I don't open another tab... I don't have time to google before I post every time, crikey. 2. The "point" of my post is that just because Reach wouldn't be playing if all those players were fit is immaterial, because those players aren't fit. You can only play who is available. 3. Nope, I haven't been to a game in a very long time. Mixture of the pains of unemployment (now fortunately ceased), high cost of attendance and apathy for the direction (both literally and with the various schemes) the club is going under DC don't enthuse me to wanting to go either. I've made little attempt to hide that fact either. Sound. Congrats on the job too 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now