Not a criticism but it’s very binary. It’s like being cross examined in the witness box and made to answer yes or no to something that demands way more elaboration.
Question 14 for instance, of course any sensible fan would want us to be sustainable but I’d accept year on year that would be difficult dependant upon the development of players you were willing to sell for profit for instance. So I’d accept that being our intention moving forward but acknowledge some flexibility within it.
Also, the biggest question of all, how does DC propose to be sustainable? Because I will bet you any money it won’t be in a “ambition-less” Brentford model, it just means bottom feeding and keeping wages low to this owner.