Jump to content

The Wednesday v Chesterfield Matchday Thread


Recommended Posts

Just now, Kanye West said:

Kit looks nice from the back at least

 

 

QUICK EVERYBODY WHAT ARE THOSE PICTURES ON FF'S SHINPADS

 

ARE THEY A CLUE

 

MAYBE IT'S AN OT RORSCHACH TEST OF SOME SORT

 

WHAT CAN WE LEARN ABOUT HIS MIIIIIIIIND

 

etc

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I was spot on about Bannan playing wide left. Everybody said, we have Reach, and Carlos has said Forestieri will compete for that berth. I said, don't you believe it, and it's taken one game. Me, I don't have an issue with him playing there, but all those who said we'd be playing with two wingers, and we don't even do that at home to Chesterfield

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like groundhog day with this fuckwit, how many times does he need to play 3CM's in a 442 to realise it doesn't work. 

 

Not to mention Pudil  at CB and Reach LB. No Fox who is actually a LB or one of the academy CB's we took to Portugal worthy of facing the mighty chesterfield?

 

Not impressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stumps said:

Wildsmith

 

Hunt             Lees             Pudil            Reach

 

     Jones     Bannan    

 

 Wallace    Hooper    Abdi   

 

Fletcher  

 

Beat me too it, hoping it will be more like this than 442 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, gurujuan said:

So I was spot on about Bannan playing wide left. Everybody said, we have Reach, and Carlos has said Forestieri will compete for that berth. I said, don't you believe it, and it's taken one game. Me, I don't have an issue with him playing there, but all those who said we'd be playing with two wingers, and we don't even do that at home to Chesterfield

 

Plus Boyd is more than capable there. I know he went missing completely at Preston, but did he pick up a knock or just being saved, y'think? (From what, I'll leave open. lol)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Etchesketch said:

Ash Baker wasn't given a squad number but is on the bench tonight.  Last few years U23's have only been given a number when needed ie last season about half a dozen were in the squad for League Cup tie and needed numbers.  Fact Hirst wasn't involved with the first team in pre season was a bigger indicator.

Yeah, i noticed my mistake almost immediately after posting. During preseason I was hoping it was simply due to him being a bit knackered, as he was playing, just not with the first team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...