WalthamOwl Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 No and no. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owlsend Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 Johnson is a maybe but inconsistent... windass 100%no And in my eyes needs to go next season and not be offered a contract. Let's get somebody else in. That will play More than handful of games and be More consistent Probably. For half is wage. That won't go missing when a boxing eevent is on.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwellOwl Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 1 hour ago, CircleSeven said: I’d go with this. I’ve always thought Windass is good as an impact sub. Johnson’s performances obviously vary a lot but what’s the alternative at this stage? Starting Pederson? I’d say start him and if he’s having a mare, hook him . I think Johnson will come good. Windass in the past 2 games has been poor and doesn't warrant a start. However, hardly have depth of players waiting to replace him! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
island owl Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 No to Johnson, need someone with more fight. Windass maybe 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oh_weds_we_love_you Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 Depends what the alternatives are and if they're in the right frame of mind to perform for the club, on what's probably one of their last games here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unkastav Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 If you mean Dean and Reda? YES!!! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHUowl Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 2 hours ago, Southie_Owl said: Maybe I don't know. Can you repeat the question? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roscoe P. Coltrane Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 Definitely not... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sefton owl Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 Johnson yes, windass no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1952Owl Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 Marv ain't been good for last 5 games. Personality issue. Too risky. We need fighters. Those who would die for the Owls. Leave Marv out then. Windass. Bench. Not convinced he has "the fight or will" to contribute to the team tbh. Sad situation with these 2. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fablon Dunlop Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 Windass yes. Johnson no. Windass should be near full fitness and he'll put the effort in. Johnson has been abysmal and he looks like he's thinking about that next move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Propa brews Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 NO... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geörge Whitebread Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 No - we need all hands on deck at this point, not passengers. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unkastav Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 1 hour ago, Fablon Dunlop said: Windass yes. Johnson no. Windass should be near full fitness and he'll put the effort in. Johnson has been abysmal and he looks like he's thinking about that next move. The new Fox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deano Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 We were so much better v Stoke with Windass on the pitch. He's not perfect of course but we need this kind of link player in the absence of Poveda. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Road Runner Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 You need players who will leave it all out on the pitch. Windass - possibly if no other option. Johnson - no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ever the pessimist Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 Nope 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawrie’s Left Peg Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 4 hours ago, Snelldog said: Both on the bench. Very poor against Stoke. Not fit, not bothered or possibly both. Do you imagine they’d be more bothered after sitting on the bench in the cold for 60 mins? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areNOTwhatTHEYseem Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 42 minutes ago, deano said: We were so much better v Stoke with Windass on the pitch. He's not perfect of course but we need this kind of link player in the absence of Poveda. This is how I saw it, too. He created a great chance for Ugbo which really should have resulted in a goal, linked our attack and midfield, and helped us to retain possession, and thus pressure, in the final third. Yes, he's coming back from an injury and clearly faded, but we were better with him on the pitch than off. I think some are looking for him to do things that aren't his game rather than focusing on what he does do, for some reason. I've given up trying to make sense as to why. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Meadows Posted April 18 Share Posted April 18 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now