marshy Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 https://www.transfermarkt.com/sheffield-wednesday/transfers/verein/1035 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Snooty Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 44 minutes ago, bobowl said: Perhaps Doyen can get rid of a few of our players to some unsuspecting clubs. They have had our pants down enough times now they owe us. Probably our best rising young stars from the academy. After all they only gain from touting our best prospects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Snooty Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 23 minutes ago, pgmetcalf said: It's not who you sign, it's how you teach them Sort of. It's hard to teach natural pace though.. I agree when signing promising young guns. We should be improving them. When you are signing 30 year olds though... When you're signing in the bracket of what could be considered 'ready made' players.....then you have to sign ones that fit the plan and the system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
room0035 Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 Then look at how many players played yesterday who were Stuart Gray signings Westwood, lees, loovens, Lee, hutch (if fit would have played) half the team not Carlos buys but play every game. Then palmer , Wildsmith, nuihu in bench again not Carlos buys either. Does not say a lot for Carlos putting his stamp on the team when you think the amount of players signed over last 2+ years you would expect 1 or 2 not 5, look at villa 1 season into Steve Bruce's reign and see how much they have changed a while new team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalthamOwl Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 Really is quite poor that we have spent a lot of money yet the side is almost the same. Whoever made the signings should have a lot to answer for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
room0035 Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Lord Snooty said: Sort of. It's hard to teach natural pace though.. I agree when signing promising young guns. We should be improving them. When you are signing 30 year olds though... When you're signing in the bracket of what could be considered 'ready made' players.....then you have to sign ones that fit the plan and the system. You sign one of the most potent strikers over the last 10 years in the championship then don't play him, then when you do you give him no service. This piece of excellent business will eventually cost us £8m fee and £2m a season in salary one major wee wee tail up no wonder FFP is an issue Gray hold squad did cost including wages what a badly managed Rhodes will cost us. Edited October 22, 2017 by room0035 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holmowl Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 3 changes to the team that was good enough to reach the final 16 months ago. Why is that so bad? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaunwoo45 Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 Wembley team better foresteri playing on left keeping reach out of team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essix Blue Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 7 minutes ago, Holmowl said: 3 changes to the team that was good enough to reach the final 16 months ago. Why is that so bad? Because we haven’t improved? leaving Wembley that day me and a few mates all agreed we needed a few players and the main area was midfield. Diame was a difference besides the goal, we seemed a bit lightweight in there. This still hasn’t been addressed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trevdi9 Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 who recomended Doyen sports to the club Did he hate us that much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
York_Owl Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 24 minutes ago, Holmowl said: 3 changes to the team that was good enough to reach the final 16 months ago. Why is that so bad? If those three players were the mobile, quick centre forward, a midfield general and an upgrade on Loovens at centre back that we needed two seasons ago then it wouldn’t be bad at all. Unfortunately they are not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash77 Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 Blatant clues about cc being clueless are right there. Helan and nuhiu brought on instead of matias & joao! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holmowl Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 I think when FF and Hutch are fit, we will be fielding the EXACT team that started the final. Carlos will put FF in for Fletcher, and drop Reach (or play him LB) to make room for all three of Lee, Bannan and Hutch in midfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattitheowl Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 Now do the same for say Brighton that season and now. Just not bothered... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Chow Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 2 hours ago, Suzuki_San said: I would argue that the old side was better... But was Carlos and not so tactically inept Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
York_Owl Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 14 minutes ago, Holmowl said: I think when FF and Hutch are fit, we will be fielding the EXACT team that started the final. Carlos will put FF in for Fletcher, and drop Reach (or play him LB) to make room for all three of Lee, Bannan and Hutch in midfield. All the right players just not in the right positions. in a 4-3-3 or even 3-5-2 Hutchinson, Bannan and Lee would be a great triumvirate. Unfortunately, Carlos tries to shoehorn them into a 4-4-2. A system for which we lack the pace and physicality to play effectively over the course of a season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owl Be Back Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 Doyen are there to make as much money for themselves as possible. If that means screwing Wednesday, they don't care. Their involvement in the club has screwed up our finances for the next 2 to 5 years. Get rid of them now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
debram Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 2 hours ago, @owlstalk said: Check out the starting lineup at Wembley when we lost to Hull City in the playoff final in May 2016 Compare it to the current starting lineup despite all the new signings Something is seriously wrong regarding recruitment and new players isn't it. Thats my gripe with cc, spent loads and not improved, not good enough by far Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
debram Posted October 22, 2017 Share Posted October 22, 2017 2 hours ago, Mr Farrell said: Shocking and incredibly incompetent. How can a club spend so much and not improve the side in 2 years ? Forget the crap results. Forget the crap football. Lack of improving the starting 11 is a sackable offence in itself. After hull was bad enough but to ignore the obvious after hudds is criminal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted October 22, 2017 Author Share Posted October 22, 2017 5 minutes ago, debram said: Thats my gripe with cc, spent loads and not improved, not good enough by far More bizarrely... We've spent millions and yet not bothered to play the players we've bought Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now