sweetsheri Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 3 minutes ago, A12owl said: At 68 perhaps you are right i dont need it. stick to owlstalk... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owls2k Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 It's clear that Carlos is a huge fan of both Wallace and Reach, one of the reasons is their defensive game which has been crucial to us being so solid recently. These 2 positions are crucial when our full backs play so far up the pitch. It's clear that they are being asked to to do a lot more defensive work, for Wallace this a lot more compared to last season which is why Carlos felt the need to mention this in the post match interview. Because at a glance he looks much less of a threat going forward. Macmanaman is a retro winger, brilliant and direct. But I'm not surprised Carlos is sticking with Wallace until he's up to speed, especially today against a top side. I'd expect Wallace to start against Brighton but the 'winnable' run of fixtures after next Friday night will be Macmanaman's chance I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owl_in_Oz Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 I like Macca's attitude so far. Seems determined to make an impact. If he's fully up to speed I think we can all agree that he's easily part of our best XI - whether that's on the left wing, right wing, or part of a front 3 - he's a class player and should be in the starting XI from here on in every time if fit imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiamK2292 Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 Should've come on earlier than he did. Putting him on for the junk minutes won't help. Granted he made an impact today but that won't happen every time. Can understand his frustrations if there are any. He hasn't come here to warm the bench. You can argue that he's a better option than Wallace/Reach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kendoddsdadsdogsdead Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 I really like him as a player. His first thought is to get forward a d run at defenders. He probably should have come on ten minutes earlier, but he is someone who IS going to make a tremendous impact to our attacking options. He can play on both flanks, so is versatile in that respect to too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trevdi9 Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 (edited) his time will come and then it will be for the others to shift him Edited January 15, 2017 by trevdi9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dutch McLovin Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 2 hours ago, Owl_in_Oz said: I like Macca's attitude so far. Seems determined to make an impact. If he's fully up to speed I think we can all agree that he's easily part of our best XI - whether that's on the left wing, right wing, or part of a front 3 - he's a class player and should be in the starting XI from here on in every time if fit imo. Quality post totally agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Deleted member Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 8 hours ago, whyte_owl said: He's here, the resident ****. Last week Reach was the reason we lost. He's here, the resident stalker who follows me around being offensive Last week I said that Reach should be dropped in favour of McManaman and FF on the wings, and that I felt the weight of expectation on Reach that comes with his price tag was possibly affecting his performances. I didn't say he was the reason we lost last week. I said that he was undroppable in a side that was struggling to replicate the performances from last season. But don't let the facts stop you being a total pr#*k Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djorkaeff Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 17 minutes ago, Grandad said: He's here, the resident stalker who follows me around being offensive Last week I said that Reach should be dropped in favour of McManaman and FF on the wings, and that I felt the weight of expectation on Reach that comes with his price tag was possibly affecting his performances. I didn't say he was the reason we lost last week. I said that he was undroppable in a side that was struggling to replicate the performances from last season. But don't let the facts stop you being a total pr#*k He's obviously a Remoaner Grandad. Can't cope with the fact he pinned all his hopes into economic disaster and he was wrong. He'll blame you anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Deleted member Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 10 minutes ago, djorkaeff said: He's obviously a Remoaner Grandad. Can't cope with the fact he pinned all his hopes into economic disaster and he was wrong. He'll blame you anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigdan2003 Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 12 hours ago, Grandad said: Thought Reach had a great 2nd half yep, you could see the confidence returning. Same with Bannan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heppers Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 14 hours ago, Grandad said: Thought Reach had a great 2nd half Don't be bringing your crap positivity on here when we've won 2-0 against promotion rivals. Rubbish. drop the team, sack the coach. Chansiri out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Snooty Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 10 hours ago, A12owl said: I will have to get on twitter. Im sure my life is missing something. Lunatics? Bullies? Fantasists? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Sewell Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 14 hours ago, Jackie Sewell said: McManaman came out again after the game with two staff and jogged around the pitch so not completely mardy. Further to my post, how about, he feels a twinge as he makes the second goal, so immediate reaction is disappointment, which explains why he didn't sprint across to the corner flag. At full time he goes straight off for treatment has a massage and then comes out with two fitness trainers for a gentle jog. Why else would he come out again on a cold day instead of having a good shower? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McRightSide Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 10 hours ago, Liamswfc92 said: Should've come on earlier than he did. Putting him on for the junk minutes won't help. Granted he made an impact today but that won't happen every time. Can understand his frustrations if there are any. He hasn't come here to warm the bench. You can argue that he's a better option than Wallace/Reach. Remind me how many points we've been won in the 'junk minutes' this season... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
debram Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 dont think hes quite match fit yet, he did an extensive work out on the pitch after the game yesterday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wilyfox Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 Good. I like a bit of attitude from attacking players. It motivates them. We knew McManaman was a hot-head before we took him on. Carlos will manage it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
debram Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 5 minutes ago, wilyfox said: Good. I like a bit of attitude from attacking players. It motivates them. We knew McManaman was a hot-head before we took him on. Carlos will manage it. dont think cc will tolerate bad attitude, hele be gone if he upsets the apple cart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Snooty Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 Thats why as a loan, it's a no lose situation. Player desperate for game time. Get his career back on track. Desperate to play to earn himself a move here or elsewhere. Anything untoward goes off he's simply back to WBA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wilyfox Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 7 minutes ago, debram said: dont think cc will tolerate bad attitude, hele be gone if he upsets the apple cart Well, Carlos said post-match he's very happy with McManaman - so I won't worry just yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now