The enigma that is Jordan Rhodes

[DSandersonOWL]

26 minutes ago, Emilianenko said:

no I don't

 

Edited June 29, 2020 by DSandersonOWL
spelling error

[Bleeder]

1 minute ago, Emilianenko said:

Was he a really good poster like me?

 

 

He were pretty good 

[Emilianenko]

3 minutes ago, alanharper said:

 

You're not helping yourself really when you use the Brentford game as evidence that Rhodes changed the game, when he wasn't involved in either goal. I could just as easily point you to the Bristol City and Stoke games at Christmas when we scored no goals when we started with him on the pitch and scored 3 after he'd been subbed. And your previous argument was that we lost at Wigan after he went off, when it was actually the other way round, we lost after he came on. 

 

Then again, when you have to resort to using funny names for posters, and then saying "some of us know about football" it's a sure sign that you've got nothing left... 

 

 

 

So someone has to be involved in goals to change a game?

As stated earlier some of us understand football and some of you don't.

Edited June 29, 2020 by Emilianenko

[EcclesallOwl]

Not really read the thread but I do hope someone’s not trying to say that someone who doesn’t rate Rhodes doesn’t understand football 

[Emilianenko]

1 minute ago, EcclesallOwl said:

Not really read the thread but I do hope someone’s not trying to say that someone who doesn’t rate Rhodes doesn’t understand football 

Heyup Carrots

[EcclesallOwl]

“I don’t agree with your opinion”

 

”well you obviously don’t understand football”

 

[Inspector Lestrade]

8 minutes ago, Emilianenko said:

 

So someone has to be involved in goals to change a game?

As stated earlier some of us understand football and some of you don't.

 

Instead, of just stating that you understand football and some don't, can you demonstrate that?   

 

Why do you understand it more than others?

 

[Emilianenko]

2 minutes ago, EcclesallOwl said:

“I don’t agree with your opinion”

 

”well you obviously don’t understand football”

 

Have you read some of his posts?

I have , he clearly knows nowt Carrots.

[Emilianenko]

1 minute ago, Inspector Lestrade said:

 

Instead, of just stating that you understand football and some don't, can you demonstrate that?   

 

Why do you understand it more than others?

 

Because I'm cleverer than most.

[alanharper]

9 minutes ago, Emilianenko said:

 

So someone has to be involved in goals to change a game?

As stated earlier some of us understand football and some of you don't.

 

As I recall it, Rhodes came on at HT and was barely involved, and we only started to look better when Reach came on, minutes before we equalised.

 

But hey what do I know, I don't understand football. I've been told so by somebody who also told us that Rhodes started at Wigan and Odubajo only brought down the Derby player because Rhodes wasn't on the pitch. 

[Inspector Lestrade]

1 minute ago, Emilianenko said:

Because I'm cleverer than most.

 

Not surprised if you have two heads.

 

 

[Emilianenko]

1 minute ago, alanharper said:

 

As I recall it, Rhodes came on at HT and was barely involved, and we only started to look better when Reach came on, minutes before we equalised.

 

But hey what do I know, I don't understand football. I've been told so by somebody who also told us that Rhodes started at Wigan and Odubajo only brought down the Derby player because Rhodes wasn't on the pitch. 

 

1 minute ago, alanharper said:

 

 First sensible thing you've said all night.

[DJMortimer]

3 minutes ago, Emilianenko said:

Because I'm cleverer than most.

 

...except when it comes to spelling your own username.

 

 

[Emilianenko]

2 minutes ago, Inspector Lestrade said:

 

Not surprised if you have two heads.

 

 

I'm sure I told you I don't. I  can see why I am cleverer than you.

 

[Inspector Lestrade]

Are the schools still closed?

[Emilianenko]

Just now, DJMortimer said:

 

...except when it comes to spelling your own username.

 

 

It's my user name I'll decide how I spell it.

[Sergeant Tibbs]

8 hours ago, FinnishOwl said:

 

That's exactly what I meant. He couldn't produce what he was bought for, so confidence shot and never regained. If he was bullied, I wouldn't be surprised as he somehow seems an easy target.

He probably liked it at Norwich so it's a shame they only made a p***take offer. It would have been the best option for all parties if he had ended up there this season.

What’s the basis for the bullying claim. Any comments from the player himself. 
I could imagine him struggling to fit in a tight nit unit, particularly as soon as it became public knowledge that he refused to take a penalty in the play offs.

[Inspector Lestrade]

Just now, Emilianenko said:

I'm sure I told you I don't. I  can see why I am cleverer than you.

 

 

OK Janus

[Emilianenko]

Just now, Inspector Lestrade said:

Are the schools still closed?

You obviously missed loads.

[handworth52]

9 hours ago, pat blondeau said:

Even though Wickham has never been our player, he’s now scored the same number of league goals for Wednesday as Rhodes (11 each).

 

And Rhodes has scored the same number of league goals at Hillsborough for Huddersfield as he has for Wednesday (4 for both clubs). 
 

Rhodes last goal at Hillsborough came on the 31 October 2017. That’s some goal drought on your home ground 

blimey what an unwanted stat , just under 3 years he must have earned over 5 million since his last goal for us at home . thats staggering (yes i know he was at norwich for some of that time)