Jump to content


Sheffield Wednesday Fan
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

486 Excellent

1 Follower

About Bleeder

  • Rank
    Sheffield Wednesday Reserves

Recent Profile Visitors

1,706 profile views
  1. Ooops, meant Murphy, Harris does put a shift in...
  2. Odubajo needs alot of support. Despite not being the strongest in the tackle (!) Reach works very hard and will always get back to cover, (as he did today when brought back into midfield.) Harris nowhere nearly as industrious. If Odubajo plays, Reach plays in front of him imo.
  3. Guess this is one of the main arguments for Bullen not getting the managers job. Needs shaking up but it seems LB is very reluctant to drop players who he has been around a long time. Bannan has been fantastic for us but in the last couple of games his passing, (his main/?only attribute) has been woeful at times. Out of form for me and needs a rest. Can Bullen do that? Would he? Doesn't look like it.
  4. Was just about to post that re Iorfa. He may have played in that position in the past but he looked lost today. Can't really imagine him having the composure and would much rather see him used (when necessary) as a full back.
  5. Like this but with Reach in for Murphy. Think we seem to lack the numbers in midfield when not on the ball and Reach is industrious enough to drop back when needed. Also becoming less keen on Bannan and Hutchinson together. Bannan often seems to drop into the space Hutchinson already occupies leaving alot of space in centre mid. Bullen needs to earn his corn... I think we have much better footballers than we have a football team at the moment - he seems to be struggling to find the right formula.
  6. Agree.... but BB had an awful game..
  7. Agree with this. Doesn't appear to know his best side as yet. Substitutions somewhat hit and hope. Big decision for DC.
  8. Stick with the system. Westwood Iorfa, Borner, Lees, Palmer Bannan, Hutch or Luongo, Lee Reach, Fletcher, Harris Think we played far too deep first half v Luton with Bannan dropping deep and Hutch already sitting. Too predictable without KL for me.
  9. I know it's not fashionable to say this but I think the second half at least was made for Nuhiu. In a cluttered untidy penalty area he has the ability to cause a lot of problems. Easy to say in hindsight I know but I'm not sure what Rhodes was ever likely to offer in such a physical game. Just seen Birley's post. Couldn't agree more.
  10. No way. Shame for all of us really. I reckon he would've done very well for us and himself if he'd stayed here. As it is, it's looking like he's in for a very difficult and probably unhappy time with Ashley as his boss.
  11. Agree with this. Apart from the cun bit. We have a strong squad and on balance will win far more of the games like yesterday's than we will draw or lose. We didn't have the rub of the green, that's the way it goes. For what it's worth, (not much I know,) I think it may have been better to have Nuhiu and FF on the pitch second half to try to break down a very physical Milwall defence.
  12. I really have no idea what the nature of KL's problems are mate but there have been suggestions on here that they were degenerative rather than the result of injury. If that is the case then it would often be indicated to put surgery off for as long as possible. Who knows. .....that's certainly not to say that we didn't have a bizarrely long injury list during CC's tenure!
  13. Bannan for Reach in midfield for me. Two of Harris, Murphy, FF or Reach either side of Fletcher. Need to concentrate on our game not theirs imo. They'll be physically strong but no reason we can't win if we take the game to 'em.
  • Create New...