Sova Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 No one could blame the ref for not wanting to see more of that turgid second half than he had to, but there were 5 substitutions that half, all at different times, plus various stoppages for injuries (a couple of head injuries to their players for a start), yet we got just 3 minutes, and Bannan was injured for about a minute of that. But the final whistle came after just over the 3 minutes. Yes, Luton very much deserved to get a replay, and I doubt very much that we'd have scored had any more time been played, but once again I'm left confused about what exactly the policy on added time is supposed to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plonk Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 What is this policy you speak of. They just guess. Thought at least five today but no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev Owl Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 I for one was glad to go home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clud17 Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 We could have played another 15 minutes and not scored. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papalazarowl Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 Need a external time keeper, who times exactly how long it takes for a player at the opposite side of the pitch to slowly walk off, and properly time injuries. Also for keepers who take the wee wee taking 45+ secs to take a goal kick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodys Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 Seems to be when we need to score it’s only 3 mins but if we are holding on it’s 4 minimum and upwards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dewsburyowl58 Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 7 minutes ago, clud17 said: We could have played another 15 minutes and not scored. Maybe on the 16th minute then ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Newsome Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 You know the rules, when we need a goal we get a max of 3 minutes even if a player is struck by lightning. However in the rare occasion we lead there has to be at least 5-7 minutes added on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew_Owl Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 15 minutes ago, clud17 said: We could have played another 15 minutes and not scored. Why 15 minutes, a bit random pal! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew_Owl Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 I thought 5 or 6 minutes should have been added. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ironman Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 Ref was awful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAnotherShez Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 1 hour ago, Rev Owl said: I for one was glad to go home. Think that was the ref's thoughts. 3 minutes? Ridiculous. Not that I think it cost us anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birley Owl 1867 Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 54 minutes ago, papalazarowl said: Need a external time keeper, who times exactly how long it takes for a player at the opposite side of the pitch to slowly walk off, and properly time injuries. Also for keepers who take the wee wee taking 45+ secs to take a goal kick. They're voting on a new rule to say that players go off at closest sideline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wakefieldowl Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 1 hour ago, Sova said: No one could blame the ref for not wanting to see more of that turgid second half than he had to, but there were 5 substitutions that half, all at different times, plus various stoppages for injuries (a couple of head injuries to their players for a start), yet we got just 3 minutes, and Bannan was injured for about a minute of that. But the final whistle came after just over the 3 minutes. Yes, Luton very much deserved to get a replay, and I doubt very much that we'd have scored had any more time been played, but once again I'm left confused about what exactly the policy on added time is supposed to be. Villa game last week had 14 minutes i jury time. I checked the BBC real time text out of interest and there were only two stoppages of a minute each..... so yes plonk, they do make it up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
latemodelchild Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 Ref was poor. Gave them everything and us next to nothing. Winnall was hacked down and got nowt. Really fed up with refs at S6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clud17 Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 2 hours ago, Andrew_Owl said: Why 15 minutes, a bit random pal! Just a number, the point being we played very little attacking football and didnt really look like scoring. The time added on was irrelevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birstall Owl Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 Call me cynical but as the games were on TV for the foreign markets not a lot of added time so they can get the adverts on. On a normal Saturday the PL games have always finished well before EFL ones, at the end of the day shouldn't matter what league it is it's 90 mins of football, same when ITV had CL games they were usually done by 9:33/4 whereas EFL (non-televised games) are finishing 5-6 mins later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now