The Night-Owl Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 11 minutes ago, Shezza said: We were never going to sign two top class Championship center backs. Mulgrew will provide very good cover. Yeah, just need to go all out for one top class centre back for this level to partner Lees or Loovens. Whilst versatile players like Mulgrew and Hutchinson would be beneficial squad players to have and very good cover for various positions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckwheat Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 Hope this is some kind of wind up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No 2 is r nilsson Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 11 minutes ago, gurujuan said: If we are using full backs to provide the width, a lot of teams do that, then why do we need wingers? What I mean is, why use wingers as auxiliary midfielders, when we could use the real thing If he is using more of a 4231 or even a 433 yesterday then the width will come from full backs more than the midfield or forwards. I think the out and out winger (however much we love them) may be rare these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonny Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 5 hours ago, james o connor said: I know hunt is fashionable to slag off on here but I'm going to go against the grain and go with what I've seen. Hunt is the right age and getting better. Hutton is overrated and getting worse , we don't need to slow our team down even further . Is Hutton slow these days then? Used to be the fastest player in the Prem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saxondale Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 38 minutes ago, gurujuan said: Maybe, but if that is the case, do we really need two thirty something reserve centre backs What's the alternative? 2 young untried, untested CB's on loan? I know what I prefer. You don't half post some rubbish just to be Harry Opposite sometimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saxondale Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 5 hours ago, Great Big Galaa said: I think we'll get Hanley in on loan probably nearer deadline day. Apparently Ashley has no intention of letting him out on loan at the minute, wants his money back what he paid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birley Owl 1867 Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 Just now, Saxondale said: Apparently Ashley has no intention of letting him out on loan at the minute, wants his money back what he paid. He'll change his mind toward end of month when he has 50k wasting away Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gurujuan Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 3 minutes ago, Saxondale said: What's the alternative? 2 young untried, untested CB's on loan? I know what I prefer. You don't half post some rubbish just to be Harry Opposite sometimes. Why do people always have to mean they want a polar opposite? Just because I suggest we shouldn't really have two thirty something reserve centre backs, doesn't mean the alternative has to be two on loan novices It's hardly the norm that your back up players are in their30s is it? One maybe, then you'd look to have someone a little younger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saxondale Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 3 minutes ago, gurujuan said: Why do people always have to mean they want a polar opposite? Just because I suggest we shouldn't really have two thirty something reserve centre backs, doesn't mean the alternative has to be two on loan novices It's hardly the norm that your back up players are in their30s is it? One maybe, then you'd look to have someone a little younger Says who? I'd much rather have 2 "thirty something" centre halves with Championship experience ready to step straight in. Surely that is common sense? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiJ Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 tbf gurujuan you moan about whoever we sign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gurujuan Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 Just now, SiJ said: tbf gurujuan you moan about whoever we sign. Not true, I thought Forestieri was a good signing, and so it proved Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeeeeJ Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 Hutton no Mulgrew - Wouldn't mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lomas613 Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 What's with CC obsession with Scottish does he want the new kit to be kilts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiJ Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 1 minute ago, gurujuan said: Not true, I thought Forestieri was a good signing, and so it proved 1 player. You thought 1 player would turn out to be good. You've moaned about pretty much every single signing since and before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiJ Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 1 minute ago, DeeeeeJ said: Hutton no Mulgrew - Wouldn't mind. My thoughts. Mulgrew would be a decent signing. He's got good experience and can play pretty much across the backfour, plus in midfield. Hutton is garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gurujuan Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 1 minute ago, SiJ said: 1 player. You thought 1 player would turn out to be good. You've moaned about pretty much every single signing since and before. No, most of the good ones I supported The not so good ones, I was a bit meh about, and I never wanted Gary Taylor-Fletcher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
runningaround Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 depth wise would say Mulgrew is a decent bit of competition for either the 1st choice CBs, haven't seen enough of Hutton to say if he is an upgrade on Hunt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pazowl55 Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 1 hour ago, gurujuan said: If we are using full backs to provide the width, a lot of teams do that, then why do we need wingers? What I mean is, why use wingers as auxiliary midfielders, when we could use the real thing McManaman, Buckley are wingers and were used. I would say we played more with wide midfielders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shandypants Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 Just looking up Mulgrew on Wikipedia "In December 2010, Mulgrew and girlfriend Alana were questioned by Strathclyde Policeafter businesswoman Michelle Mone alerted them when she saw Mulgrew's child left alone in a car in freezing temperatures.[58] The couple were charged with child neglect,[59] although charges were later dropped due to a lack of evidence.[60]" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred mciver Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 Hutton compared to Hunt is like Barcelona to Barnsley. His class would also well support our right wingers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now