Jump to content

2 proper wingers and a centre back


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, BD2OWL said:

And a manager.

 

Should see us ok next season.

 

You cannot have the likes of Rhodes, Fletcher & Winnall in the side and put one decent cross a game in.

 

 

 

 

We didn't have Rhodes and Winnall in the side.

 

Rhodes should have played. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest samowl

Agreed. No good having the guns without the bullets. We need players to feed our strikers. Plus a brute of a midfielder. We're too soft and too nice 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Holmowl said:

 

We didn't have Rhodes and Winnall in the side.

 

Rhodes should have played. 

 

Totally disagree.

 

I couldn't believe how unfit he seemed last night. He was blowing out his arse by extra time.

 

He came on way too early for Fletcher.

Edited by owlZfan84
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BD2OWL said:

And a manager.

 

Should see us ok next season.

 

You cannot have the likes of Rhodes, Fletcher & Winnall in the side and put one decent cross a game in.

 

 

 

 

I suggest that will be the most important signing of the Summer. We've got a squad the equal of anything in this division (including Autos) but we have a manager who has not the foggiest how to use it properly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest keepitsteel67

A center back a center back, two proper wingers and a center back... More strikerssss more strikerssss, 4 more strikers and no center back!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, samowl said:

Agreed. No good having the guns without the bullets. We need players to feed our strikers. Plus a brute of a midfielder. We're too soft and too nice 

 

I have been saying for a while we need a Diame type midfielder.

 

I have no doubt we will lose a few this summer, need to move on the manager pretty quick so he can sort the wheat from the chaff.

 

I just hope we can keep hold of the likes of Lee and Lees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We either need two classic wingers with pace and crossing ability (and for them to be played regularly) 

OR

Alternatively, we need a set of forwards used to playing with their backs to goal and specialising in knock-downs.

 

Personally, I'd much rather have the former but our current problem is having strikers and wide midfielders in the team who don't play together effectively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, sweetsheri said:

We need a mobile version of hutch too.

 

As much as I like hutch I think Carlos made a mistake playing him last night.

He sits too deep which alters the whole shape of the team. 

 

 

 

I think he is told to sit deep.

 

Either him or Bannan drop so deep they are the closest player to Westwood, I think its because they are both capable of pinging the ball pretty accurately, but 9 times out of 10 we just go sideways anyhow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, owlZfan84 said:

 

Totally disagree.

 

I couldn't believe how unfit he seemed last night. He was blowing out his arse by extra time.

 

He came on way too early for Fletcher.

 

 

Hes been unfit for the majority of his time here which is a worry. 

 

I do do stand by what I've been saying though in that you put the ball in the box Fletcher, Hooper, Winnall and Rhodes will all score given the service. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is, you can't just add two wingers and a centre back, although I agree we may need them. We don't have a central midfield pairing that would allow us to play with two wingers playing wide. Without the wingers tucking in,  Lee and Bannan are two lightweight, we'd be overrun. Hutchinson and Lee would give us more bite, but would it be creative enough Ditto Hutchinson and Bannan. If we are going to play 4-4-2, then we need to get different midfield options, as well as wingers and a centre back. Maybe even a decent strike partner who brings the best out of Hooper or Rhodes. 

If you want to upgrade our full backs, then we are already looking at major investment and upheaval again Do we need that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Think tank said:

I'd add a left back to the list and then I would agree. 

and a quality midfielder in the Mooy mould and we should be sorted.

 

1 or 2 wingers

1 defensive midfielder

1 centre back

 

i'm happy with the rest of the team, full backs, central players, strikers etc ..

 

and anyone with f*cking pace because we are severely lacking in that department!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gurujuan said:

The problem is, you can't just add two wingers and a centre back, although I agree we may need them. We don't have a central midfield pairing that would allow us to play with two wingers playing wide. Without the wingers tucking in,  Lee and Bannan are two lightweight, we'd be overrun. Hutchinson and Lee would give us more bite, but would it be creative enough Ditto Hutchinson and Bannan. If we are going to play 4-4-2, then we need to get different midfield options, as well as wingers and a centre back. Maybe even a decent strike partner who brings the best out of Hooper or Rhodes. 

If you want to upgrade our full backs, then we are already looking at major investment and upheaval again Do we need that?

 

Yes, we do.

 

I agree we are lightweight in midfield, but this is the fault of Carlos, no one else.

 

He brought in player capable of pressing high, then stopped them pressing high.

 

I would hate to lost Hutch/Bannan/Lee (especially Lee) but I feel one of the has to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...