Hyde2005 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 delgado i thought his season was done? most of us dont rate hendricks but he certainly can do a job coming on in 2nd half in games 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1952Owl Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Albertowl Please enlighten me as to what skills Hendricks has then? I can't see any added value in him. Passed it. Is he someone you would trust to give much needed 150% effort for the Owls? If he is getting £35k a week even if he doesn't play.....how passionate will he be? Sorry, it's a deffo no from me. Pity we couldn't send him back and save £35k a week and bring in a younger, proven alternative? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areNOTwhatTHEYseem Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 (edited) 1 hour ago, Sham67 said: Coventry signed for Charlton 20 days before Byers left Wednesday. He left on the last day of the window. I would imagine Röhl knew by then he wasn’t getting a direct replacement. Coventry was just one player. I'd be amazed if Röhl didn't have others he was interested in. Edited March 11 by areNOTwhatTHEYseem 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frastheowl Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 18 minutes ago, areNOTwhatTHEYseem said: Coventry was just one player. I'd be amazed if Röhl didn't have others he was interested in. Not sure I subscribe to that idea tbh. It's standard practice for clubs to not move players on, until a replacement is signed. It's often cited as the main reason why the January transfer window is so slow. If Röhl was after a midfielder to replace Byers, you agree a deal in principle with Blackpool, and only ratify it once a midfielder is signed. I suspect it was more to do with Byers not willing to play 2nd fiddle, and wanted regular football in order to earn himself a move, instead of seeing his contract dwindle down sat on the bench. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DIPPS_S.W.F.C Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 I'd fooo k them all off that way and say thankyou but,naaaa m8.... UTO..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4evaowl Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Unless there are contractual issues (eg appearances trigger extra payments or contract extensions) it makes sense to fill the spare places. I'm confident DR will make the right decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areNOTwhatTHEYseem Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 59 minutes ago, frastheowl said: Not sure I subscribe to that idea tbh. It's standard practice for clubs to not move players on, until a replacement is signed. It's often cited as the main reason why the January transfer window is so slow. If Röhl was after a midfielder to replace Byers, you agree a deal in principle with Blackpool, and only ratify it once a midfielder is signed. I suspect it was more to do with Byers not willing to play 2nd fiddle, and wanted regular football in order to earn himself a move, instead of seeing his contract dwindle down sat on the bench. That's the way most clubs would do it, yes. But it seems strange that we were clearly in the market for a central midfielder yet we allowed three to leave and failed to recruit any. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owlabroad2001 Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Paterson and Hendrick for me. Gregory doesn’t fit Röhl’s style and there are 3 players in front of Delgado for the right wing back spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluesteel. Posted March 11 Share Posted March 11 Would be interesting to see how Delgado does when fit as he does look to have some decent technique but lacked that pace to really make use of it when playing in Xiscos counter attacking team. Whether that changes with what Röhl is doing who knows but we do seem to start attacks higher up the pitch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogers Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 We might need to throw Gregory on with 10 minutes to go at Sunderland to bog hang, when we need a miracle to stay up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sham67 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 12 hours ago, areNOTwhatTHEYseem said: Coventry was just one player. I'd be amazed if Röhl didn't have others he was interested in. That may or may not be correct. What is certain is that he would have known by deadline day no one was coming in. You know, the day he allowed Byers to leave. It’s clear to see the two decisions were not related. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areNOTwhatTHEYseem Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 12 minutes ago, Sham67 said: That may or may not be correct. What is certain is that he would have known by deadline day no one was coming in. You know, the day he allowed Byers to leave. It’s clear to see the two decisions were not related. The vast majority of deals happen on deadline day. It's not inconceivable that we were trying to get other deals over the line up to the final hours. Either way, it's left us short in the centre of the pitch if either Bannan or Vaulks get injured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sham67 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 1 minute ago, areNOTwhatTHEYseem said: The vast majority of deals happen on deadline day. It's not inconceivable that we were trying to get other deals over the line up to the final hours. Either way, it's left us short in the centre of the pitch if either Bannan or Vaulks get injured. I think it’s time you accepted that Byers wasn’t in the manager’s plans. I trust his judgement, perhaps you ought to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areNOTwhatTHEYseem Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 1 minute ago, Sham67 said: I think it’s time you accepted that Byers wasn’t in the manager’s plans. I trust his judgement, perhaps you ought to. Eh? I've accepted that Byers clearly wasn't in Röhl's plans. I just also think it's clear he wanted to strengthen the centre of midfield, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WorrallOwl17 Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 Think all 3 would serve a purpose being registered to be honest. Delgado like said above clearly has something, and I'll not be judging him when playing out of position in the dullest system I've seen at S6 this century. He would be handy off the bench at right wing back if Pol is ever struggling. Gregory for me would be a bigger goal threat than Smith and Fletcher so he'd be worth adding to the squad and we're clearly very light in centre midfield so Hendrick would be a decent back up with all that experience, and probably would be our biggest goal threat from centre mid, which doesn't say much because none of them score a goal who play there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oh_weds_we_love_you Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 May as well register our own players now as it doesn't look like we'll be going into the free transfer market. Hendrick, and then Delgado and Paterson if fit, for me - that as least helps numbers-wise in midfield, which is seriously lacking in numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owlinexile Posted March 12 Share Posted March 12 I forgot Delgado existed tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now