victorturner Posted February 21, 2021 Share Posted February 21, 2021 10 hours ago, s6 owl said: The difference is their players were straight into the refs ear when Shaw made the foul while ours just roll over and let the opposition take the p**s without contesting. Even their keeper came running out at the second tackle for a yellow card. Mind you no way the first tackle was a foul and the second was very marginal . The blokes on Quest thought the referee made a mistake and Lee Mason has of course just been taken off refereering in the Premiership after complaints from clubs like Southampton. Thought of appealing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG D Posted February 21, 2021 Share Posted February 21, 2021 6 minutes ago, victorturner said: Even their keeper came running out at the second tackle for a yellow card. Mind you no way the first tackle was a foul and the second was very marginal . The blokes on Quest thought the referee made a mistake and Lee Mason has of course just been taken off refereering in the Premiership after complaints from clubs like Southampton. Thought of appealing? You can’t appeal 2 yellows. Which is ridiculous 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
victorturner Posted February 21, 2021 Share Posted February 21, 2021 1 hour ago, BIG D said: You can’t appeal 2 yellows. Which is ridiculous Had not realised that..thanks. But Lee Mason needs a letter to his boss at least Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doubled123456 Posted February 21, 2021 Share Posted February 21, 2021 2 hours ago, victorturner said: Even their keeper came running out at the second tackle for a yellow card. Mind you no way the first tackle was a foul and the second was very marginal . The blokes on Quest thought the referee made a mistake and Lee Mason has of course just been taken off refereering in the Premiership after complaints from clubs like Southampton. Thought of appealing? 2nd booking was warranted. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawrie Madden Posted February 21, 2021 Share Posted February 21, 2021 22 hours ago, Pulixifer said: It's a bit of a mute argument. If he stays on his feet he completes both matches. No use to us in the stands. Moot, Mute means to silence 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted February 22, 2021 Share Posted February 22, 2021 Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fredowl Posted February 22, 2021 Share Posted February 22, 2021 most coaches tell players stay on your feet not liams case Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wilyfox Posted February 22, 2021 Share Posted February 22, 2021 3 minutes ago, fredowl said: most coaches tell players stay on your feet not liams case Are sliding tackles against the rules now, because that’s all it was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Costello 77 Posted February 22, 2021 Share Posted February 22, 2021 I do wish that all refs would slow down their decision making process. Yes blow the whistle but go over to the lino and clarify... give yourself time to think. They're often in their pockets before the player's landed. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fredowl Posted February 22, 2021 Share Posted February 22, 2021 2 minutes ago, wilyfox said: Are sliding tackles against the rules now, because that’s all it was. got the ball clearly but left some on the player also, in that area of the pitch there was no need to even tackle him 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted February 22, 2021 Share Posted February 22, 2021 1 minute ago, fredowl said: got the ball clearly but left some on the player also, in that area of the pitch there was no need to even tackle him The bit about no need to tackle in a particular part of the pitch is an interesting one isn't it though I agree that maybe in that part of the pitch there was no need for such a robust tackle But if the tackle is good, and the refereeing can be trusted to be fair, then what's the harm in making it in that part (or any) of the pitch? If that makes sense? Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wilyfox Posted February 22, 2021 Share Posted February 22, 2021 Just now, fredowl said: got the ball clearly but left some on the player also, in that area of the pitch there was no need to even tackle him saying there’s no need doesn’t make it wrong or a foul. It was a sliding tackle. He took the ball clean. Wasn’t high. Wasn’t dangerous. Their player end up on his arse after follow-through, but it wasn’t reckless and there was no injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAnotherShez Posted February 22, 2021 Share Posted February 22, 2021 I hope some supporters give him a bit of support should they have twitter type accounts. The insults hurled at him that were shown by Neil yesterday were bloody disgusting. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted February 22, 2021 Share Posted February 22, 2021 1 minute ago, OhForAnotherShez said: I hope some supporters give him a bit of support should they have twitter type accounts. The insults hurled at him that were shown by Neil yesterday were bloody disgusting. There are fans on Twitter who have offered messages of support to him and told him to ignore the bad ones Truth is though - it's simply human nature to see, read, digest and focus on the hateful ones That's true of footballers, TV people, movie stars, youtubers, musicians, politicians etc it's leading to serious mental health issues and has already led to suicides If someone gets 10000 positive messages and 2 horrific ones - they will focus on the 2 horrific ones And no amount of 'they shouldn't do that then' will fix it - because it's simply not possible to NOT focus on the bad messages you recieve 1 Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fredowl Posted February 22, 2021 Share Posted February 22, 2021 1 minute ago, @owlstalk said: The bit about no need to tackle in a particular part of the pitch is an interesting one isn't it though I agree that maybe in that part of the pitch there was no need for such a robust tackle But if the tackle is good, and the refereeing can be trusted to be fair, then what's the harm in making it in that part (or any) of the pitch? If that makes sense? that type of tackle is maybe a better way of putting it hopefully the lad will learn with experience just not the hutchinson way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG D Posted February 22, 2021 Share Posted February 22, 2021 I'm not saying Liams tackle was anything like this because it wasn't but you used to have dirty tw@ts like Vinnie Jones doing stuff like this. I think this finished Gary Stevens career. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted February 22, 2021 Share Posted February 22, 2021 All those slating Liam Shaw saying he shouldn't play for us now will get exactly what they wanted in the next few games Enjoy Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest HillsboroughOwlNI Posted February 22, 2021 Share Posted February 22, 2021 26 minutes ago, @owlstalk said: All those slating Liam Shaw saying he shouldn't play for us now will get exactly what they wanted in the next few games Enjoy Joey... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Down South Posted February 22, 2021 Share Posted February 22, 2021 1 hour ago, wilyfox said: saying there’s no need doesn’t make it wrong or a foul. It was a sliding tackle. He took the ball clean. Wasn’t high. Wasn’t dangerous. Their player end up on his arse after follow-through, but it wasn’t reckless and there was no injury. I thought it was as clear a foul as you will ever see by today’s standards and deserved a booking. His trailing leg took the player out from behind. Was unlucky with first booking (having seen it a few times now I thought Birmingham player dived), but for a player already on a yellow card that second challenge was pretty stupid. I used to love a sliding tackle, but increasingly players have to stay on their feet these days or risk giving fouls away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tea Baggins Posted February 22, 2021 Share Posted February 22, 2021 On 20/02/2021 at 22:26, Dot said: I think most people can see the first one wasn't a yellow. but on a yellow, he shouldn't have made the utterly stupid tackle that got him sent off It was a great tackle. End of story, won the ball clearly, went in 1 footed, grounded, fully in control. On 20/02/2021 at 22:27, @owlstalk said: Yeah totally But the first 'foul' wans't even a foul I despair with some decisions made by referee's today. What's even more frustrating is they are rarely held to task over them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now