Jump to content

Go and get Gayle


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Costello 77 said:

Take your attention seeking one's off and we'll all be seeing the the same way.

 

So it's now attention seeking to point out that we have a player that also is capable of 'bending the rules'? But seemingly no one has a problem with that. I wouldn't want Gayle here because firstly, it's absolutely ridiculous to even mention him, he wouldn't sign for us in a million years, and he's well out of our budget if we are wanting to run a more sustainable football club. But to claim you wouldn't take him for footballing reasons or cheating is just pure hypocrisy. 

Edited by Not Jon Newsome
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Not Jon Newsome said:

 

So it's now attention seeking to point out that we have a player that also is capable of 'bending the rules'? But seemingly no one has a problem with that. I wouldn't want Gayle here because firstly, it's absolutely ridiculous to even mention him, he wouldn't sign for us in a million years, and he's well out of our budget if we are wanting to run a more sustainable football club. But to claim you wouldn't take him for footballing reasons or cheating is just pure hypocrisy. 

At least I've driven you to make a reasonable post.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Not Jon Newsome said:

 

So it's now attention seeking to point out that we have a player that also is capable of 'bending the rules'? But seemingly no one has a problem with that. I wouldn't want Gayle here because firstly, it's absolutely ridiculous to even mention him, he wouldn't sign for us in a million years, and he's well out of our budget if we are wanting to run a more sustainable football club. But to claim you wouldn't take him for footballing reasons or cheating is just pure hypocrisy. 

A loan isn't beyond our means if we move other players, however if we did get him it would show we haven't learned from past mistakes in overpaying for players and hurting the team going forward.

 

If we had parachute payments it would be different but we don't so we must target a more affordable striker be it on loan or permanent. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Not Jon Newsome said:

 

So it's now attention seeking to point out that we have a player that also is capable of 'bending the rules'? But seemingly no one has a problem with that. I wouldn't want Gayle here because firstly, it's absolutely ridiculous to even mention him, he wouldn't sign for us in a million years, and he's well out of our budget if we are wanting to run a more sustainable football club. But to claim you wouldn't take him for footballing reasons or cheating is just pure hypocrisy

No it isn't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Not Jon Newsome said:

 

Explain how you can defend FF but when Gayle does it it's wrong then?

Gayle does it most of the time. Of course the example you posted of FF was poor.

 

Like having a weed addict and a heroin addict.

Both are addicted to drugs but i'd suggest one is viewed significantly different to the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, uɐıɹɐqɯıɹ⅁ said:

 

You need to take your red and white ones off you silly boy.

 

Proved you wrong so call me a pig, I'd be a hardworking pig to be undercover for this many posts wouldn't I. Difference is I can look at things objectively and without bias. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Not Jon Newsome said:

 

Proved you wrong so call me a pig, I'd be a hardworking pig to be undercover for this many posts wouldn't I. Difference is I can look at things objectively and without bias. 

 

How did you prove me wrong? I said "I don't remember ever seeing him go down when never even touched unlike Gayle.", I have only ever watched him play for us so I've never seen that video you gleefully dragged out from 5 years ago, so yeah well done you finding that one example in 5 years, Gayle dived 2-3 times minimum, every single game I've ever watched him play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 21/05/2019 at 19:51, Not Jon Newsome said:

 

So it's now attention seeking to point out that we have a player that also is capable of 'bending the rules'? But seemingly no one has a problem with that. I wouldn't want Gayle here because firstly, it's absolutely ridiculous to even mention him, he wouldn't sign for us in a million years, and he's well out of our budget if we are wanting to run a more sustainable football club. But to claim you wouldn't take him for footballing reasons or cheating is just pure hypocrisy. 

 

He'd sign for anybody daft enough to pay his inflated salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...