Jump to content

Steve Bruce and Swarbrick


Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, HIGHERSTATE said:

Appears theyve made up since then

 

Brucie's sides never play that well.

 

Hull didn't set the league on fire two seasons ago, but he got them over the line.

 

Apparently they were bob at the Lane, yet left with the points.

 

I want Villa to finish in the play-offs, because I think if that happens they'll win them.

 

Which means the Blades and Leeds are staying down.

Carlito1.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Will69 said:

Let it go.

 

Villa were the better side, we lost to a top 6 team, we conceded FOUR goals.

 

Regardless of how “corrupt” the ref was. Accept it, move on, you’ll feel better for it.

 

Let it go! Thought this was a forum to discuss such things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Athelwulf said:

 

Brucie's sides never play that well.

 

Hull didn't set the league on fire two seasons ago, but he got them over the line.

 

Apparently they were bob at the Lane, yet left with the points.

 

I want Villa to finish in the play-offs, because I think if that happens they'll win them.

 

Which means the Blades and Leeds are staying down.

Carlito1.png

Get an expensive tough fit team, be clever about it..hes taken fergies most cynical worst...becomming the biggest teams go to man to get teams promoted..but today was ***** sinister.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Will69 said:

 

Why? Do football fans have the magical ability to moan so much about the referee that the Football League immediately reverse the score line and award a win to the cheated side?

 

No, thought not.

You clearly weren't at the game.  

I've never seen a match where the home team wins just one free kick in the whole game.  

Ref might as well have been Steve Bruce.  I think he would have been fairer.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Will69 said:

 

So, mister has all his badgers, prey tell, if we were the better side why did we chose to give them four goals?

So, and tell me if I am wrong, a game played between team A and Team B, the ref gives Team A four dodgy penalties and disallows four goals by team B, then Team A are the better team?

 

The buses don't go were you live chuck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Will69 said:

 

So, mister has all his badgers, prey tell, if we were the better side why did we chose to give them four goals?

Your attempt at sarcasm would look better if you used the right words. For example, badges, pray and choose. Poor effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Will69 said:

 

Did we concede FOUR goals to a team at the polar opposite end of the table? Did we lose?

 

Yes.

 

So they were the better team. Either that or we were so good we took pity on them and started putting the ball in our own net like you do on FIFA to make it a challenge.

I didn't go.

The BBC reporter and talksoprt reporter both stated the result was  wrong.

Stick that in yer pipe and smoke it.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Will69 said:

Let it go.

 

Villa were the better side, we lost to a top 6 team, we conceded FOUR goals.

 

Regardless of how “corrupt” the ref was. Accept it, move on, you’ll feel better for it.

Very little difference between the two teams until the last 15 minutes. Just the width of the post away from scoring four ourselves today

Fitness is still a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...