SiJ Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 57 minutes ago, Nut said: I would say it enhances his legacy. It would be easier to score goals with a top side like City than it as at Tottenham. That's true, but top players are also judged by winning things. And yea, much inferior players have won titles, cups and so forth, but I can't help but feel that Kane needs to get his hands on at least one major trophy. He will always have that mark against him if he doesn't. The way he's going he will do well to win as many cups as such Spurs legends as Jermaine Jenas and Vedran Corluka (one league cup). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dronfield Blue Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 Ronaldo gets a City mention in this BBC article. Can't see that happening, but you never know. https://www.bbc.com/sport/58312551 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raminpeace Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 He’s not worth the money. only Chelsea or Man City could even think about that fee. I think he would be more suited to Chelsea than Man City but Chelsea don’t really need him now - unless Lukaku gets injured. he’ll end up staying with Spurs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dronfield Blue Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 44 minutes ago, Raminpeace said: He’s not worth the money. only Chelsea or Man City could even think about that fee. I think he would be more suited to Chelsea than Man City but Chelsea don’t really need him now - unless Lukaku gets injured. he’ll end up staying with Spurs. Probably ..... and winning nowt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kopparberg Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 What a huge waste of time Kane’s statement is very funny indeed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owlinexile Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 So is he going to stop behaving like a massive ridiculous manbaby now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mcguigan Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 1 minute ago, owlinexile said: So is he going to stop behaving like a massive ridiculous manbaby now? Till January. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohgoditsjames Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 Levy would rather make nothing than take the £120 million quid, how stubborn is that bloke? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreshOwl Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 (edited) 9 minutes ago, ohgoditsjames said: Levy would rather make nothing than take the £120 million quid, how stubborn is that bloke? It’s beyond ridiculous. Levy has had a mare on all fronts. 1 man doesn’t make a club. I know he’s under contract but in any other profession, if you want to leave your place of work, you find something else and leave. Simple. Whats even worse is keeping someone against their will, why would you want to make someone unhappy, and then expect them to integrate back into the side and perform how you want them to? Levy won’t gain more than £120m by keeping him. They ain’t gonna win jack shiit. So he’s effectively shooting himself in the foot and missing out on over a hundred million quid for no reason It’s business madness Edited August 25, 2021 by FreshOwl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roscoe P. Coltrane Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 Kwai Chang Kane just walked over rice paper without leaving a trace.. It's time for him to leave.. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiJ Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 1 hour ago, FreshOwl said: It’s beyond ridiculous. Levy has had a mare on all fronts. 1 man doesn’t make a club. I know he’s under contract but in any other profession, if you want to leave your place of work, you find something else and leave. Simple. Whats even worse is keeping someone against their will, why would you want to make someone unhappy, and then expect them to integrate back into the side and perform how you want them to? Levy won’t gain more than £120m by keeping him. They ain’t gonna win jack shiit. So he’s effectively shooting himself in the foot and missing out on over a hundred million quid for no reason It’s business madness Levy is an idiot. Said it loads of time. Every now and then he gets lucky. Spurs kept Eriksen on for a good year despite him having wanting to leave. They then sold him for a cut price fee with six months on his contract left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scram Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 I am baffled why people think he's not a good buy but Haarland would be an excellent acquisition Kane is just about as near as its possible to get a guaranteed PL goalscorer - he's done it consistently over many seasons at a rate that bears comparison with the best ever to play in our top league Haarland may well go on the bear comparison but right now given the choice i'd take Kane all day and every day I think City dropped a bollock by going for Grealish over Kane tbh 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiJ Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 2 minutes ago, scram said: I think City dropped a bollock by going for Grealish over Kane tbh Agreed. Grealish screams a bit of a vanity purchase tbh. Suggestions Bernardo Silva wanted out, but still. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG D Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 I think Grealish will end up being an incredible player for City. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scram Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 Possibly - but is he what they required right now over a proven goalscorer? One of the reasons may be that there must be some concerns over the ongoing availability of KDB? Maybe Grealish is to give them a shift in style of play and reduce reliance on KDB? I think what would really set City up - and would be delicious if it happened is if they could sign Mbappe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyline Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 My thinking was Grealish was brought in simply to stop him going elsewhere and also as KDB replacement as he's now in his 30's. City did not need him, they need an out and out striker and Kane is the perfect fit. Haaland is younger, looks a real prospect but he's going to cost a lot more than Kane. Not even talking about transfer fee's here - His agent wants stupid money for himself and his player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scram Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 Haaland is younger but nowhere near as proven as Kane Out of the 2 right now for a PL club there really is only one choice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG D Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 Kane is perfect for City. The number of six yard box tap ins they create and his ability to drop deeper and play others through. Just made for each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owlinexile Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 Grealish is good but he's no KDB. But then who is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreshOwl Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 Kane wants a new contract at £400k p/W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now