Jump to content

Reach, Fletcher, Luongo, Fox - Update?


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, nilsson said:

Sometimes players become better players when they’re out of the side. That’s what’s happened with these 4.

 

What would you do with the new loan players now? I’ve no idea what team he picks on Saturday but think he should go back to the 4-4-2 that was working alright 

 

A good question and one that occurred to me too.

 

Would you rather start Fletcher or Wickham, Reach or Da Cruz, Luongo or Windass? 

 

I suppose a Luongo-Bannan-Windass midfield is possibly a decent shout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Holmowl said:

 

A good question and one that occurred to me too.

 

Would you rather start Fletcher or Wickham, Reach or Da Cruz, Luongo or Windass? 

 

I suppose a Luongo-Bannan-Windass midfield is possibly a decent shout.

Our best .... unfrozen...side might just be

 

Dawson......

Palmer Iorfa Borner Fox

Reach Bannan Luongo Harris

     Fletcher Wickham

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, nilsson said:

Sometimes players become better players when they’re out of the side. That’s what’s happened with these 4.

 

What would you do with the new loan players now? I’ve no idea what team he picks on Saturday but think he should go back to the 4-4-2 that was working alright 


Really??
 

- Fletcher had the best average rating this season of any player prior to getting injured, was scoring goals in a shocking team. 

 

- Reach has an assist rate that’s better than Bannans, scores goals too, good engine. 
 

Fox has been me consistent for us this season and his attacking threat has increased to boot. 
 

Luongo is a bit of an unknown but surely a box to box all round midfield player is a better option than our limited players of Bannan & Joey... he may not be better than those two in one area of his game but his all round game supersedes both by miles.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Holmowl said:

 

A good question and one that occurred to me too.

 

Would you rather start Fletcher or Wickham, Reach or Da Cruz, Luongo or Windass? 

 

I suppose a Luongo-Bannan-Windass midfield is possibly a decent shout.


Windass hasn’t done a lot in the two games. Personally I’d drop him and Da Cruz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Philb125 said:


Really??
 

- Fletcher had the best average rating this season of any player prior to getting injured, was scoring goals in a shocking team. 

 

- Reach has an assist rate that’s better than Bannans, scores goals too, good engine. 
 

Fox has been me consistent for us this season and his attacking threat has increased to boot. 
 

Luongo is a bit of an unknown but surely a box to box all round midfield player is a better option than our limited players of Bannan & Joey... he may not be better than those two in one area of his game but his all round game supersedes both by miles.  


Reach gets some stick on here. All I was saying was we look even worse without them in the team. Windass and Da Cruz don’t look like the answer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, nilsson said:

Sometimes players become better players when they’re out of the side. That’s what’s happened with these 4.

 

What would you do with the new loan players now? I’ve no idea what team he picks on Saturday but think he should go back to the 4-4-2 that was working alright 

 

Would have Fletcher over Wickham any day of the week from what i've seen so far. 

 

Looks overweight and unfit to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless we deal with the center of midfield we are fiddling whilst Rome burns. 

 

Luongo is the best of what we need; but he's no way perfect. Bannan will probably play, but his position needs reviewing in context with the side and players' set up. He's actually part of the problem.

 

Fletcher will calm things down, but again we can't just rely on this to stop the rot. Reach goes missing when the going gets tough and other than him jogging about a bit, i'm not particularly confident he's the answer.

 

Fox is just an average player - again might stablise things but ain't going to make dramatic difference IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, owl84 said:

 

and you'd keep Wickham? Why? Because he is called Wickham. 

 

Windass did alright at Barnsley.


No probably not but we’ve more options for replacing Windass and Da Cruz. There’s Reach, Murphy, Harris and FF that can all play there.

 

If he drops Wickham he’d need to bring back either Rhodes, Winnall or Nuhiu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, nilsson said:

Sometimes players become better players when they’re out of the side. That’s what’s happened with these 4.

 

What would you do with the new loan players now? I’ve no idea what team he picks on Saturday but think he should go back to the 4-4-2 that was working alright 

Reach definitely becomes a better when he’s out of the side than he is in it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest wilyfox

Reach has been told he won't play for us again without a haircut. Luongo has been banished for serving dodgy shrimp on a mini barbecue at the training ground. Fox has been told he won't play unless he signs a new contract. Fletcher's head-desso injury is on the mend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...