Court case

[General_Grievous]

Had a good look around but cant find any info on how the court case went the other day. Can someone summarise and/or post a link to some article?  Ta

[Pablo Bonvin]

4 minutes ago, A12owl said:

Don't know if this helps G_G.

 

https://www.supremecourt.uk/current-cases/

 

I’d love to see Snoots compose an OMDT out of some of those cases......
 

And several cases which might generate “lively” debate in the dark confines of The Dressing Room too.

[doubleo]

I’m sure I read somewhere, but can’t find it now, that the judge had heard all the evidence and would pass judgement w/c 6 Jan.

[Mike Hunt]

What court case are you referring to ? 

[Sonny]

1 hour ago, General_Grievous said:

Had a good look around but cant find any info on how the court case went the other day. Can someone summarise and/or post a link to some article?  Ta

 

Some stuff in this thread...

 

 

 

[Lawrie Madden]

Club and council have until Jan 8th to come to agreement if they don’t the Judge will make a ruling on the restrictions but the council have already said that if the ruling goes against them they’ll redraft it and impose it again and the club can then appeal again 

[darra]

1 hour ago, Lawrie Madden said:

Club and council have until Jan 8th to come to agreement if they don’t the Judge will make a ruling on the restrictions but the council have already said that if the ruling goes against them they’ll redraft it and impose it again and the club can then appeal again 

Could the Judge prevent them from redrafting it? By doing that they could be seen as saying the judge doesn't know what they're talking about?. Any legal bods know if this could happen?

[theowlsman]

I believe 33 got away with the charge of stealing underwear from his neighbour’s washing line.

 

However, for the charge of abusing the Queen’s English by using incorrect grammar, including neglecting to use full stops, he received a suspended sentence.

[room0035]

I sure I heard on the radio that even if we win the council will rewrite the order and impose a new one in the club, meaning no change and more legals.

 

The judges needs in find in our favour and lift the silly van and let's get back to bring a football team.

 

 

[darklord]

Sounds like the council are very determined on winning regardless of whats deemed best for the fans

[Philb125]

5 hours ago, General_Grievous said:

Had a good look around but cant find any info on how the court case went the other day. Can someone summarise and/or post a link to some article?  Ta

can you be more specific as to which case? 

[Paul..]

3 hours ago, Lawrie Madden said:

the council have already said that if the ruling goes against them they’ll redraft it and impose it again and the club can then appeal again 

 

Judge needs to hold them in contempt if they do that.

[Hookowl]

2 hours ago, room0035 said:

I sure I heard on the radio that even if we win the council will rewrite the order and impose a new one in the club, meaning no change and more legals.

 

The judges needs in find in our favour and lift the silly van and let's get back to bring a football team.

 

 

 

[Lawrie Madden]

34 minutes ago, uɐıɹɐqɯıɹ⅁ said:

 

Judge needs to hold them in contempt if they do that.

Can’t because the judge already said that she isn’t ruling on any safety issues just on the wording of the restriction notice which leaves it open to redrafting 

Basically the club can’t win this one it took months to get to court this time nothing to suggest that it will take any less time on a reimposed notice