Jump to content
addedtime

Chansiri charged - could be banned from football

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, room0035 said:

I must be missing something but do you read anything are just post

 

What top flight football did we have under Milan ????????/

 

:duntmatter:

 

Our FFP advisor is Sir Dave Richards.

 

I read everything prior to posting, between the lines and prior to deletion.

 

Maybe it’s you who “are just post.”

 

:duntmatter:

Edited by sonofbert2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, sage owl said:

The only problem with this scenario is that the EFL will appoint the "independent body " as far as I'm aware. 

 

True, but the one hope comes from the EFL appealing against the decision that the independent body made against Bolton. If they’re rigging the game then they haven’t been very good at it so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, hugeowl said:

I will simplify that 

 

no one was bothered how much money he was chucking at it were they ?

Many were at odds with his pricing policy and rightly so but I cannot remember any threads saying we have spent too much on players 

 

Mr C will have to defend his fiscal goings on while still propping us up financially 

Nothing has been proven yet 

But let’s just demonise the person who was trying to give us what we have craved .

Because nobody knew the pickle we were in. He specifically said FFP wasn’t a problem. He was either wrong or lying. 

  • Agree 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, rickygoo said:

Because nobody knew the pickle we were in. He specifically said FFP wasn’t a problem. He was either wrong or lying. 

 

Or tricked.

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, sage owl said:

The only problem with this scenario is that the EFL will appoint the "independent body " as far as I'm aware. 

Why is that a problem? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, sonofbert2 said:

 

Or tricked.

I’d put that into the wrong category! 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, sage owl said:

The only problem with this scenario is that the EFL will appoint the "independent body " as far as I'm aware. 


The fact they’re called the ‘independent disciplinary commission’ doesn’t bode well either

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, rickygoo said:

I’d put that into the wrong category! 

 

Depends who tricked him especially if it possibly involves two former chairmen.

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, hugeowl said:

Of course you did petal 

I remember it very well because I was surprised at how strong and unpleasant your vitriol towards me was, after I expressed my concern about the scattergun recruitment seemingly focussed around older players in positions that we seemed pretty well stocked in. I thought it pretty unreasonable at the time. 

 

But by all means, live in the present... that's the only thing that really counts right now. And the present is looking potentially pretty naff for us Wednesday fans

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sweetsheri said:

It can be backdated if it can prove that an agreement was in place.

 

Not as simple as that, no money has changed hands

1 hour ago, wellbeaten-the-owl said:

Don't want to get too much into this again but regards point 2:

 

Mr Maguire has a lot to answer for as either  a) knowingly giving a distorted picture without making the relevant points or b) being incompetent and not giving full picture

 

To summarize:

 

Payment date = irrelevant

Land registry date = irrelevant

Completion date = not necessarily relevant

Company incorporated date = irrelevant

Comparison to west ham = not fully relevant depending on valuation method used.

 

ONLY important fact is terms  and form of purchase and sale contract, which is not in public domain. 

 

 

For it to be a sale actual money needs to have been exchanged and relevant taxes paid. Obviously Chansiri will be able to provide proof and the EFL will drop everything once this misunderstanding has been cleared up. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Minton said:

 

A playoff final, a playoff semi-final and the highest 3 finishes we've had in 15 years. 

 

Compared to League 1 campaigns filled with mid-table mediocrity, failing to beat bottom end league 1 teams with 9 men and ending an hour from bankrupcy with literally not a pot to wee wee in. Yeah, his tenure has been an utter shambles. Give over, you tart.

 

 

Presumably you’re one of the few Dave Richards fans still going to Hillsborough. He achieved a damn sight more than Chansiri. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When Dave Allen was involved we were a nats of doing a Bury 

 

when MM came in he steadied the ship but was losing about 3 million a year nevermind what he said he would have sold us to anyone with dosh 

Mr C has had a pop and it may well go boobies up to some degree it may not 

 

but be careful what you wish for 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, StudentOwl said:

I remember it very well because I was surprised at how strong and unpleasant your vitriol towards me was, after I expressed my concern about the scattergun recruitment seemingly focussed around older players in positions that we seemed pretty well stocked in. I thought it pretty unreasonable at the time. 

 

But by all means, live in the present... that's the only thing that really counts right now. And the present is looking potentially pretty naff for us Wednesday fans

Mate. Unless you wear wonka blue vision glasses and see what people want you to see rather than actually seeing with your own eyes whats occuring then im afraid thats the lie of the land on here. Bed wetter, happy clapper, take your pick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, rickygoo said:

Presumably you’re one of the few Dave Richards fans still going to Hillsborough. He achieved a damn sight more than Chansiri. 

 

Our FFP man you mean?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, hugeowl said:

Of course you did petal 

So he can’t remember this but you can remember nobody questioned Chansiri? Memory man! 

 

 

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Kameron said:

 

Not as simple as that, no money has changed hands

 

For it to be a sale actual money needs to have been exchanged and relevant taxes paid. Obviously Chansiri will be able to provide proof and the EFL will drop everything once this misunderstanding has been cleared up. 

Course he can. No problem here. Move on...........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, hugeowl said:

When Dave Allen was involved we were a nats of doing a Bury 

 

when MM came in he steadied the ship but was losing about 3 million a year nevermind what he said he would have sold us to anyone with dosh 

Mr C has had a pop and it may well go boobies up to some degree it may not 

 

but be careful what you wish for 

Nobody wished for selling Hillsborough, colossal losses and an embargo never mind points deductions and relegation should it come to that. 

  • Agree 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Blatter said:

Good stuff A12.....guilty til proved innocent ?

I did say may be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, nilsson said:


Mandaric is 81 years old now. Do you think he’d have the appetite or energy to take a club like us on again?

 

I'm in my mid-thirties and I'm struggling to be honest

  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, SiJ said:

Far too many people quite happy to declare on here that the club has committed fraud and that Chansiri etc are crooks.

 

I appreciate it doesn't look good, but, as things stand, we have been charged and those charges still have to be proven.

 

Dont think it is a particularly wise move to putting such things on a public forum. 

 

Just some saloon bar accountancy :duntmatter:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...