billyblack

Well yes. Who does if they dont?

Its not really hindsight though is it, if you can sell for more than you bought and reinvest its just good business. Its how clubs survive

He will be injured as soon as we get him

Just to add to that, we cant afford to turn down good offers for players. Period. All this non selling club is just a pipe dream and nonsense

Forgetting Urby??

Totally, its like asking to pick between chips and sprouts

When he finally gets his act together and submits the accounts we may get some answers

For me he has just placed the club with an unnecessary risk born out of not managing the finances correctly.

For me he has just placed the club with an unnecessary risk born out of not managing the finances correctly.

Doesnt answer what happens to the stadium if DC packs his bags up and we get a new owner

He didnt know what he was doing to get us in this situation

Agree totally about the contract clauses, makes total sense to me. That's why it wont happen

so when DC leaves one day and we need a new owner, what happens then? Do we end up renting from DC until we can buy it back?

they did until about 2001 until they had to sell it when there finances got bad, they had to then rent and have been since im not sure why not owning a capital asset isn't a good idea.

No wonder DC values FF at 14 million. Wonder what he values the ground at. Proper Mickey Mouse way to run a business.