PARMACHINE OWL Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 I won`t say yes or no cos I haven`t heard of the guy - expected a bigger name tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cersei Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 Fuuck no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stoop Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 A big fat massive humongous NO This is the most important managerial appointment for a long long time, and to take a gamble seems foolish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SheffWedOwl Posted June 13, 2015 Author Share Posted June 13, 2015 ^^As JOC above. I don't have a clue about him but presume the blokes in charge do, so why not! So that means if they appointed, say, Hockaday or Carver, you'd say 'the blokes in charge must know what they are doing, so why not'?? Don't have so much faith in people who obviously haven't a flippingclue about what they are doing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torres Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 No no no no no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big_orme Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest davylowe Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 Why not, We move forward in an unknown direction Can it be that bad? Let's give whoever it is a fair chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owls7 Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 When SG was sacked, I thought, okay the club want a bigger name to bring players to the club then carvalhal happened and now I'm thinking, why not just have stayed with SG?? Maybe SG isn't a yes man, cos this carvalhal feels like a yes man kiss up. It's a no from me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest davylowe Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 Why not, We move forward in an unknown direction Can it be that bad? Let's give whoever it is a fair chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owls7 Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 Agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
modboy Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 Well the past fifteen years haven't worked so why not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lincolnowl Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 The blokes in charge also know nothing of this guy. They've been conned by a good agent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
northeastowl Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 No. Absolutely not. Why sack Gray because we have a vision of getting promoted then hire this guy. We need experience in England/Championship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lincolnowl Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 Why not? Because he could waste our chance of proper investment. It's not a bottomless pit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SheffWedOwl Posted June 13, 2015 Author Share Posted June 13, 2015 Well the past fifteen years haven't worked so why not Mainly because the last 15 years we've had eff all money! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morepork Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 On the fence.... I admit I had not heard of him! To be fair I think he deserves a bit more credit than he's getting. If we say no to this, I can bet you people will be less happy with what follows..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulmat Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 So that means if they appointed, say, Hockaday or Carver, you'd say 'the blokes in charge must know what they are doing, so why not'?? Don't have so much faith in people who obviously haven't a flippingclue about what they are doing! I have less faith in the many posters on Owlstalk who are getting their pants in a twist over some bloke they know nothing about than the people advising Chansari who may already have a good knowledge of Carvalhal from their extensive involvement in the world of football. I think it's quite obvious that the people in charge do have a plan for what they're doing. Chansari and his advisors are trying to set up a European model of a footballing committee with a coach who is used to working in similar setups. Similar models have had success at other clubs such as Watford, Southampton and Swansea, let along elsewhere in Europe. The names people have banded about on here - other than being unrealistic are unlikely to have experience of or want to work in such a committee. Big Sam, Klopp, Klinsmann et al. are never going to come to Wednesday (in our current position) and aren't going to want to be anything but the main man. I don't get the over-the-top reaction of most people on Owlstalk. It ain't like Carvalhal has dropped his CV off at reception and someone's seen it and though 'yeah he'll do'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swiss Toni Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 In all fairness...if he is appointed, only time will tell. Someone must have done their homework on this chap though. Could be a great coach which would work well under the committee. I still say that Roeder will be the reason we won't be appointing the likes of Allardyce, Lambert or other reasonably big names. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamienoga Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 No. Absolutely not. Why sack Gray because we have a vision of getting promoted then hire this guy. We need experience in England/Championship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fife_owl Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 I thought that we would now be able to afford a manager with a track record of promotions, instead of gambling every 12 months. This guy might be good, but his record suggests he's a bit of a gamble. He's not going to cause a surge in season ticket sales. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now