FreshOwl Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 are people seriously lumping bothroyd and COG together up front? jesus wept Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest brimowl Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 A bit to negative for me I agree most of the team but its got to b 4 4 2 for me 2 wingers and 2 strikers and choice of semedo or mcabe I would go with madine and bothroyd up front were at home go for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beholder Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 (edited) are people seriously lumping bothroyd and COG together up front? jesus wept They are too static and play the same kind of role. It wouldn't work. Either we use Maguire or get another striker altogether. Rodri is not the answer either though imo. Edited October 17, 2012 by Beholder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willowl Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 (edited) A bit to negative for me I agree most of the team but its got to b 4 4 2 for me 2 wingers and 2 strikers and choice of semedo or mcabe I would go with madine and bothroyd up front were at home go for it. so you say 4-3-3 is negative.... then proceed to tell us why 4-4-2 is less negative with the "we're at home go for it".... riiiiiiiiight. Edited October 17, 2012 by willowl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WayneTheOwl Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 (edited) A bit to negative for me I agree most of the team but its got to b 4 4 2 for me 2 wingers and 2 strikers and choice of semedo or mcabe I would go with madine and bothroyd up front were at home go for it. Not sure if 4-3-3 has ever been deemed as negative! Should we play 2-4-4 instead, is that positive enuff for ya? Edited October 17, 2012 by WayneTheOwl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommo_ Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 4-5-1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreshOwl Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 4-5-1 no no no no no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrrodge Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 i like the look of that lineup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoz Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 Against Burnley it was more 4-3-3 we managed to get people up along side the striker but against Hull it was more like 4-5-1 as we never got enough men to support O'Grady and never looked like scoring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chriss Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 Mattock somewhere near JJ so he can get a good smashing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
townend_owl Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 so you say 4-3-3 is negative.... then proceed to tell us why 4-4-2 is less negative with the "we're at home go for it".... riiiiiiiiight. Not sure if 4-3-3 has ever been deemed as negative! Should we play 2-4-4 instead, is that positive enuff for ya? The fact is - saying it's 4-3-3 but playing 2 wingers in the wider positions means it realistically is 4-5-1 - just like you could argue that playing Antonio and JJ in a 4-4-2 actually makes it a 4-2-4. It is negative Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Johnbloodaxe Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 bywater buxton llera gardener Mattock or Rega JJ mccabe semedo Atonio madine rodri Cog on as impact if needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ever the pessimist Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 Could push barkley forward to make a 4-2-3-1. However someone made an interesting point other day that Antonio and JJ are more attacking midfielders than wingers. Sounds a silly distinction at first, but the fact is they like running with the ball at defenders from a wide midfield position rather than getting the ball too far up the pitch. To do that you need bit more craft than simply pace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRADDAZ Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 Kirkland Buxton Llera Gardner Mattock Antonio McCabe Barkley Mayor Madine Bothroyd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradowl Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 I hear Madine is in court in morning so might not be available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Chow Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 if madine starts...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronio Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 We need to go 442, with plenty of pace on the wing. Kirkland Buxton Llera Gardner Mattock Antonio Barkley Semedo JJ O Grady Rodri Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now