Wolfmanjack Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 If he plays 30 games it looks like he will get a new deal... Sounds like other players have certain clauses in their contracts... That wasn't said. Seth Bennett asked if that was the case, and Megson said, to paraphrase, "I can't comment on that, you 'll have to ask him, and see what he says". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darra Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 Unprofessional from Megson. sorry don't agree it's about time that the truth started coming out of S6 we've been kept in the dark for far too long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRADDAZ Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 Yet more proof of why Mandaric & Megson need time to sort out this almighty shambles of a football club. flipping ludicrous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB31 Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 We're obviously looking to move him on. Good. He's been a good player in his career (before he came here) but like Teale (I know he's got another year on his contract), Potter and O'Connor he needs to go. Hasn't played anywhere near an acceptable amount since he signed, also hasn't done enough in the games he's played (don't let the odd game fool you, same with O'Connor). We have to be ruthless and get rid of these. There's experienced players out there we can get who are better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeeeeJ Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 Megson needs to know when to keep his mouth shut. Deflecting criticism maybe? Probably. Megsons first responsibility is to the players and it seems he is doing his best to wee wee most of them off. So what should he have said? Lied and said he's injured. Tommy then has to have some injury to tell people about, potentially putting other clubs off. Lying would have been worse. You're just looking for another cheap dig. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EcclesallOwl Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 Megson needs to know when to keep his mouth shut. Deflecting criticism maybe? Probably. Megsons first responsibility is to the players and it seems he is doing his best to wee wee most of them off. What the **** are you an about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djstatic Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 Megson needs to know when to keep his mouth shut. Deflecting criticism maybe? Probably. Megsons first responsibility is to the players and it seems he is doing his best to wee wee most of them off. I see where you're coming from here but I think he was pissed off at the fact that he wants to play him but now can't because he will be gauranteed an extension & I'd say Megson is still unsure who to keep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando_Trustful Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 Typical Wednesday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRADDAZ Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 So what should he have said? Lied and said he's injured. Tommy then has to have some injury to tell people about, potentially putting other clubs off. Lying would have been worse. You're just looking for another cheap dig. Well said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldishowl Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 Megson is getting stick for changing a winning team so he explained why Miller was left out. What did you want him to do tell us lies and pretend he was injured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobHowe Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 Who the hell sanctioned that decision? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan™ Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 Megsons first responsibility is to the players and it seems he is doing his best to wee wee most of them off. Hope that's an indication that he's level-headed enough to not get carried away with a couple of decent wins like some of the fans and still be determined to have a proper clear out in the summer. I was getting a bit worried that he was planning to keep ploughing on with most of them next season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lincowl Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 Megson will be glad to have him off the wage bill IMO. Showed moments of class for us but injuries have taken their toll and he doesn't have the engine to consistently perform at a decent level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amitten Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 This type of thing could be one of the main factors for the position we are in. We lost Purse because of this type of thing, now an in-form Miller has to be left out. I understand why something was put in place due to both of their injury records but not sure this was the right way to go about it. I'm just glad we got those 2 wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest aphextwins Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 Unprofessional from Megson. You're talking poo . We need to be made aware of past ridiculous decisions and if GM wants to tell us fans about these past ridiculous decisions then i'm fine with that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sheff Owl Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 That wasn't said. Seth Bennett asked if that was the case, and Megson said, to paraphrase, "I can't comment on that, you 'll have to ask him, and see what he says". Neither was it denied. It does not take a genius to work out what it is...what if he plays 30 games we give him a new car? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Bach Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 If the contracts for players were opened up whether successful or not and no matter what the club it would turn your hair white. Why do we need to know the mechanisms of the club when we know the right man is in place to fix it? Is it catarthic or something? I see it as hysterical paranoia. I don't care what contract Miller has, why he wasn't played or what Megson thinks of it - we fookin' lost and Megson is responsible. NOT MILLERS CONTRACT The players contracts has nothing to do with the fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRADDAZ Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 If the contracts for players were opened up whether successful or not and no matter what the club it would turn your hair white. Why do we need to know the mechanisms of the club when we know the right man is in place to fix it? Is it catarthic or something? I see it as hysterical paranoia. I don't care what contract Miller has, why he wasn't played or what Megson thinks of it - we fookin' lost and Megson is responsible. NOT MILLERS CONTRACT The players contracts has nothing to do with the fans. He was asked why Miller didn't play. What did you expect him to say? "None of your rumbleing business Seth" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Bach Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 He was asked why Miller didn't play. What did you expect him to say? "None of your rumbleing business Seth" If we had won would he have mentioned it? Thought not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EcclesallOwl Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 If the contracts for players were opened up whether successful or not and no matter what the club it would turn your hair white. Why do we need to know the mechanisms of the club when we know the right man is in place to fix it? Is it catarthic or something? I see it as hysterical paranoia. I don't care what contract Miller has, why he wasn't played or what Megson thinks of it - we fookin' lost and Megson is responsible. NOT MILLERS CONTRACT The players contracts has nothing to do with the fans. EVERYONE WAS flipping MOANING AT WHY HE CHANGED A WINNING SIDE SO WHAT THE **** DID YOU WANT HIM TO SAY?? SETH ASKED HIM A QUESTION AND HE ANSWERED IT. IF HE WAS UNPROFESSIONAL HE WOULD HAVE GONE ON TO SAY WHAT THE CLAUSE WAS. YOU flipping TVVAT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now