OohhJohnnyJohnny Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 Newcastle have produced the findings from the safety meeting with the council, both tiers now reduced again. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post owls maniac Posted March 13, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted March 13, 2023 In other words, only 55% of capacity for the whole stand. Utterly ridiculous, but at least the moaning Toon fans have something to show for their cry baby routine. Sooner that stand is replaced the better. 24 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post royalowlisback Posted March 13, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted March 13, 2023 Why reduce the Upper West Stand - when the 'problems' were in the lower? 16 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANDY Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 So a max of 3700 from a total of 6560 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Grassy knoll Posted March 13, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted March 13, 2023 But yet nobody has a vendetta against us . 31 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sham67 Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 Needs replacing asap. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gypsyowl Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 1 minute ago, owls maniac said: In other words, only 55% of capacity for the whole stand. When you put it like that.... that really is ridiculous. What have Newcastle gained by getting the allocation reduced for other fans? Doesn't affect us does it, the club will be affected as they'll lose revenue when we play at home to teams with bigger away followings. Mental really. Can anyone explain why they've done this? 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
royalowlisback Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 We need to allocate the Leppings Lane End to just 'virtual fans' now. Give em all some headsets at home. 1 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
royalowlisback Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 Just now, gypsyowl said: When you put it like that.... that really is ridiculous. What have Newcastle gained by getting the allocation reduced for other fans? Doesn't affect us does it, the club will be affected as they'll lose revenue when we play at home to teams with bigger away followings. Mental really. Can anyone explain why they've done this? Because it's Hillsborough. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnsleyowl1996 Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 Issue is you could do this at loads of stadiums . Overcrowding and then review . . Still a generous allocation compared to the rubbish you get at some other clubs who offer 2/3k max in a 40k stadium . obviously longer term needs a re vamp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gypsyowl Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 1 minute ago, ANDY said: So a max of 3700 from a total of 6560 Yep. What plymouth had is the new away end. The right side of the upper tier was pretty much left completely empty. Looked shyte. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnsleyowl1996 Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 Also it’s advisory isn’t it . Doesn’t mean we have to 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OohhJohnnyJohnny Posted March 13, 2023 Author Share Posted March 13, 2023 Just now, gypsyowl said: When you put it like that.... that really is ridiculous. What have Newcastle gained by getting the allocation reduced for other fans? Doesn't affect us does it, the club will be affected as they'll lose revenue when we play at home to teams with bigger away followings. Mental really. Can anyone explain why they've done this? The findings from the SAG/Council inquiry following complaints by NUFC fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post ANDY Posted March 13, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted March 13, 2023 Hope we get to play them again soon give the whingeing geordie tosspots 1000 tickets only. 30 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OohhJohnnyJohnny Posted March 13, 2023 Author Share Posted March 13, 2023 Just now, Barnsleyowl1996 said: Also it’s advisory isn’t it . Doesn’t mean we have to It’s what we limited Plymouth to so I assume we’re enforcing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
royalowlisback Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 Just now, Barnsleyowl1996 said: Also it’s advisory isn’t it . Doesn’t mean we have to Imagine if we didn't - and a supporter stubbed their toe? 4 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevowls1 Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 It's a lot of money to loose for the bigger championships games and if we were to get back into the prem. Hopefully hasten investing in a new stand! But what's wrong with the top....no problems for 40 years...now reduce the numbers to plicate Newcastle Fans! 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daveyboy66 Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 3 minutes ago, ANDY said: Hope we get to play them again soon give the whingeing geordie tosspots 1000 tickets only. Yeah 500 for the lower and 500 for the upper 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morganowl Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 sag it looked like they left us alone ,they been all over barnsley and utd this season with massive restrictions ,now there back on our case .. i dont even think it would make a difference if we owned say stadium mk , they would make an excuse up that too many were standing so we will after half the away end etc . so how many 1000s of empty seats do we need to lose ? thats 2800 plus in west , we already lost 1400 in nw corner , another 800 in end section on north stand that totals 5000 seats or what was seats(nw) 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigdan2003 Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 (edited) https://www.nufc.co.uk/media/75177/sag-minutes-200123_redacted.pdf for anyone interested - Newcastle used an FOI request to get the minutes. Edited March 13, 2023 by bigdan2003 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now