Minton Posted May 17, 2018 Share Posted May 17, 2018 28 minutes ago, room0035 said: They get 4 years of not caring about FFP parachute payments now last 4 years this is the complete joke of the whole system. Parachute payments are now 3 years, not 4 and are in fact only for 2 years if the club only spends a single season in the EPL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pazowl55 Posted May 17, 2018 Share Posted May 17, 2018 5 minutes ago, Daizan10 said: Remember its over 3 years. 1 of those they were in the premier league. So as long as they made a decent profit that year they might be ok. We need to see the full three year picture to know for sure. But I kinda hope they are well out of it. Also if you have been in the premier leauge in that 3 year period you get a lot more that you can lose through FFP aswell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BHA83 Posted May 17, 2018 Share Posted May 17, 2018 16 minutes ago, StudentOwl said: Neither of these clubs had parachute payments for the season listed did they? They were both relegated in the 12/13 season, and I was under the impression parachute payments last for three years... meaning their final season of them would have been in 15/16. Or am I talking out my bum? Sort of. QPR were last relegated from the Premier League in 14/15, so would’ve been on their 2nd year of parachutes. Reading’s income is a surprise though. It’s not as if they get huge crowds or anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pazowl55 Posted May 17, 2018 Share Posted May 17, 2018 17 minutes ago, BHA83 said: Sort of. QPR were last relegated from the Premier League in 14/15, so would’ve been on their 2nd year of parachutes. Reading’s income is a surprise though. It’s not as if they get huge crowds or anything. Reading were in there final year of parachute payments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sMacLean Posted May 17, 2018 Share Posted May 17, 2018 7 teams had parachute payments that season. Newcastle, Villa, Norwich, QPR, Fulham, QPR, Cardiff, Reading and Wigan to varying degrees. The first 3 got over £40m, QPR 31m and the rest £16m that season. Fulham and Norwich have lost theirs now. QPR have 1 more season. Norwich had a wage bill of £55m that season, 2nd highest in history. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
londonowl Posted May 17, 2018 Share Posted May 17, 2018 17 minutes ago, BHA83 said: Sort of. QPR were last relegated from the Premier League in 14/15, so would’ve been on their 2nd year of parachutes. Reading’s income is a surprise though. It’s not as if they get huge crowds or anything. Reading had 'media revenue' of £20.9m in 16/17, up £6.8m on the year before. Can't find out what that is exactly. £4.9m commercial revenue and just under £10m matchday income. Our income is not broken down in the same way but we have around £17m matchday and associated income plus just under £7m commercial revenue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
londonowl Posted May 17, 2018 Share Posted May 17, 2018 2 minutes ago, londonowl said: Reading had 'media revenue' of £20.9m in 16/17, up £6.8m on the year before. Can't find out what that is exactly. £4.9m commercial revenue and just under £10m matchday income. Our income is not broken down in the same way but we have around £17m matchday and associated income plus just under £7m commercial revenue. To quote my own quote, as said by pazowl before, Reading were in last year of parachute payments and look to have received around £12-£14m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BHA83 Posted May 17, 2018 Share Posted May 17, 2018 25 minutes ago, pazowl55 said: Reading were in there final year of parachute payments. True, but for a team relegated in 12/13, their final year will have ‘only’ been 8m, so it’s still a surprise to see them on income comparable with QPR, who will have received around £20m for their 2nd year of parachute payments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quist Posted May 17, 2018 Share Posted May 17, 2018 1 hour ago, pazowl55 said: Reading were in there final year of parachute payments. Reading income must have been genarated by player sales.They do let out stadiumfor corpoarte events but that income seems high even for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pazowl55 Posted May 17, 2018 Share Posted May 17, 2018 9 minutes ago, Quist said: Reading income must have been genarated by player sales.They do let out stadiumfor corpoarte events but that income seems high even for that. made up by media revenues I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOSTAGE IN PYONGYANG Posted May 17, 2018 Share Posted May 17, 2018 2 hours ago, OxonOwl said: If correct Villa are truly FFPed if they don't go up. I am so hoping Fulham do em. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sticky belly Posted May 17, 2018 Share Posted May 17, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, londonowl said: To quote my own quote, as said by pazowl before, Reading were in last year of parachute payments and look to have received around £12-£14m I was gonna say, how the hell does a club the size of Reading create that much revenue . I expected our income to be higher than it is on there. What are we doing wrong, is it because we have a SH iTE 'mega store' Edited May 17, 2018 by Sticky belly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trev Posted May 17, 2018 Share Posted May 17, 2018 1 hour ago, Sticky belly said: I was gonna say, how the hell does a club the size of Reading create that much revenue . I expected our income to be higher than it is on there. What are we doing wrong, is it because we have a SH iTE 'mega store' JV will be along shortly...dont worry. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The only way is S6 Posted May 17, 2018 Share Posted May 17, 2018 How long before the Leeds cretin pipes up? This is liking dropping pieces of candy for James Woods. Champions of Europe when it comes to turnover. Have they sacked 'ecky yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The only way is S6 Posted May 17, 2018 Share Posted May 17, 2018 1 minute ago, trev said: JV will be along shortly...dont worry. Timing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athelwulf Posted May 17, 2018 Share Posted May 17, 2018 45 minutes ago, The only way is S6 said: How long before the Leeds cretin pipes up? This is liking dropping pieces of candy for James Woods. Champions of Europe when it comes to turnover. Have they sacked 'ecky yet? It's down to nationwide merchandising, because of old Donald. The problem for them is that although they're allowed to spend more than us, they don't. Chris Wood was "only" on £17 thousand a week, a grand-a-week less than Winnall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred mciver Posted May 17, 2018 Share Posted May 17, 2018 3 outta 4 loss - makers above us will be in EPL next season and other will win Championship next year. With parachutes, only Villa's Chairman has gone as transfer nuts as Chansiri . How can Leeds' income be £10 million more than us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
just visiting Posted May 18, 2018 Share Posted May 18, 2018 17 hours ago, pazowl55 said: made up by media revenues I believe. 16/17 season for Reading included two play off semi finals and one final. A fourth round away fixture at Arsenal in the League Cup and a third round FA Cup fixture at Old Trafford, both sell outs and on TV. Plus the £1m+ for being the losing play off final club. So the perfect storm for income revenue streams really. 17/18 revenue will be a lot less. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now