Hands up if you wanted Paul Cook

[Gob_Bluth]

26 minutes ago, markowl said:

He was asking questions that the supporters wanted asking.

 

A good interviewer would have known how to get those answers without letting it get to that stage.

 

No one came out of it looking good

[Mr. Chow]

The noise of a mardy scouser, so awful 

[StudentOwl]

4 hours ago, Brad_owl said:

 

The facts are, Moore has failed to get promotion with the best squad in the division. 

You misspelled "rhetoric"

[@owlstalk]

1 hour ago, Pieman said:

My personal opinion is Cook was rattled and represented himself poorly in that interview. He’s a scouser, he should be able to banter back and handle those questions with humour and ease, they were not that tough. As for Staton or anyone watching that interview, it is obvious he has struck a nerve and there is something in those questions he didn’t want to answer. Once you get a scent, it is his job to keep going, he did the right thing imo.

 

 

Exactly

 

basically doing his job properly 

[adelphi1867]

12 hours ago, @owlstalk said:

 

I wanted him when we let Pulis go, would still have him now, but not just yet, Moore is doing a good job of rebuilding the squad, bit like Len Ashurst, and should be given the time to finish the job.

[horny owl]

I’d still take cook over Moore but it’s not going to happen so let’s get behind Moore and hopefully get out of this ‘Dog n Duck league’ next season.

[@owlstalk]

1 hour ago, Gob_Bluth said:

 

A good interviewer would have known how to get those answers without letting it get to that stage.

 

Name a better local interviewer 

[daveyboy66]

This has been an interesting thread...all the Moore haters have crawled out en masse so you know what their agenda will be from the pre-season onwards...it removes all conjecture I'm all for it 

[@owlstalk]

1 minute ago, daveyboy66 said:

This has been an interesting thread...all the Moore haters have crawled out en masse so you know what their agenda will be from the pre-season onwards...it removes all conjecture I'm all for it 

 

 

Add Staton haters too

 

Theyre always good for a laugh

 

you know the type - the same ones who cry at Joe Crann that he’s posting clickbait etc 

 

 

[daveyboy66]

1 minute ago, @owlstalk said:

 

 

Add Staton haters too

 

Theyre always good for a laugh

 

you know the type - the same ones who cry at Joe Crann that he’s posting clickbait etc 

 

 

But...Rob's always been a pain in the arris 

[@owlstalk]

Just now, daveyboy66 said:

But...Rob's always been a pain in the arris 

Yeah but he’s OUR pain in the arris 

 

 

 

[markowl]

1 hour ago, Gob_Bluth said:

 

A good interviewer would have known how to get those answers without letting it get to that stage.

 

 

How?

[Gob_Bluth]

46 minutes ago, @owlstalk said:

Name a better local interviewer 

 

I'm not local?

 

I don't know Staton from Adam, I couldn't name any other local interviewers, I'm not familiar with his work, I just think he came across poorly in this interview doing a faux Paxman impression 

 

There's more than one way to skin a cat

[Gob_Bluth]

23 minutes ago, markowl said:

How?

 

Already explained this earlier in the thread.

[@owlstalk]

Just now, Gob_Bluth said:

 

I'm not local?

 

I don't know Staton from Adam, I couldn't name any other local interviewers, I'm not familiar with his work, I just think he came across poorly in this interview doing a faux Paxman impression 

 

There's more than one way to skin a cat

 

So you can’t then 

 

Because there isn’t one

[@owlstalk]

Just now, Gob_Bluth said:

 

 

There's more than one way to skin a cat

 

What should he have done differently 

[Gob_Bluth]

6 minutes ago, @owlstalk said:

 

So you can’t then 

 

Because there isn’t one

 

Odd line of questioning

 

So because you think he's the best local one it means he was completely right in his line of questioning? 

 

You think he was right, I think he was wrong. 

 

It happens, neither of them came off well imo.

 

He could have changed tact, he could have changed his questioning and came back to those questions later once he had him onside and had calmed down.

 He decided to go full paxman

 

 

[daveyboy66]

8 minutes ago, Gob_Bluth said:

 

Already explained this earlier in the thread.

If you were a Chesterfield fan...what questions would you want asking? I'll give you a clue...the ones Rob was asking

[room0035]

Chesterfield were on for promotion then lost top scorer and best player to a fracture leg in February ad its been a downward slide since, they could still make the play-off with a win today.

 

24 goals in 27 games you dont replace a player like that.

 

take Mitrovic's goals away from Fulham they struggle to make the top 6. Take Tshimanga goals from Chessy and they are rightly struggling.

[@owlstalk]

5 minutes ago, Gob_Bluth said:

 

Odd line of questioning

 

So because you think he's the best local one it means he was completely right in his line of questioning? 

 

You think he was right, I think he was wrong. 

 

It happens, neither of them came off well imo.

 

He could have changed tact, he could have changed his questioning and came back to those questions later once he had him onside and had calmed down.

 He decided to go full paxman

 

 

 

So you say he’s a crap interviewer but can’t say how he should have done it differently and can’t name a better local interviewer