Any guesses as to why Fernando came on tonight?

[DidOwl]

He would surely have been a better bet.

[DidOwl]

Oops, I mean didn’t come on. Sorry....

[Mr Meadows]

He didn’t come on

 

 

end of thread

[Ash77]

Too small, wanted to go toe to toe with warnock instead of playing football and lost it 2nd half

Edited October 18, 2019 by Ash77

[slinger208b]

Would’ve been waking a tightrope with the ref...

[Lord Snooty]

 

Not worth risking it really.

 

Tomlin would have roundhouse kicked him in the face decapitating him and sending his hesd scudding across the turf as his limp, lifeless body fell to the turf.

 

The Ref would have given them a penalty leading to them nicking all 3 points 

 

And The FA would have banned Fernando for a millennium even though he was dead. 

 

 

[dewsburyowl58]

7 minutes ago, Lord Snooty said:

 

Not worth risking it really.

 

Tomlin would have roundhouse kicked him in the face decapitating him and sending his hesd scudding across the turf as his limp, lifeless body fell to the turf.

 

The Ref would have given them a penalty leading to them nicking all 3 points 

 

And The FA would have banned Fernando for a millennium even though he was dead. 

 

 

You kid not !!! 

[OWLERTON GHOST]

He looked very comfortable slouched on the bench mind.....

Not good for his L6 though, can lead to serious back pain that in later life ...

So for me a terrible performance from Forrestieri last night ....

 

 

Edited October 19, 2019 by OWLERTON GHOST

[debram]

9 hours ago, DidOwl said:

He would surely have been a better bet.

Agree, and it was a mistake to take off Bannan. 

[handworth52]

1 minute ago, debram said:

Agree, and it was a mistake to take off Bannan. 

bannan wasn't in the game 2nd half whether he was carrying a knock I don't know , he was getting bullied and had no effect 2nd half. but he should have fetched on fessi instead. and replaced fletcher who was tiring with nuhiu . there were loads of space for fessi to run into as Cardiff were pushing forward 

[Owls2k]

On 19/10/2019 at 08:49, debram said:

Agree, and it was a mistake to take off Bannan. 

We weren't keeping the ball with him on the pitch so it was understandable to sacrifice him for some proper height. Didn't work in the end but it was probably the correct decision as he wasn't effective enough.

[shezzas left peg]

Not played enough first team games over the last year, yes he's probably fit, but monk might have decided he's not yet match Sharp or fit enough yet. 

It was a tight game we were 0-1 up away from home and he's not the best defencivly or the quickest. 

Bringing Murphy on who's quicker and would theoretically be better for fast countering on the break did make sense, it was just a pity he was absolutely awful when he came on and offered very little, though hindsight is a wonderful thing. 

[TommyCraig]

We may have won the game had Monk brought him on, who knows. We might have lost 2-1.

The little man has a huge part to play in our promotion season though. Take note Garry, it's written in the stars.. and the stands.