Jump to content

It's all down to Monk now.


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Utah Owl said:

Someone posted this a while back, but over the last 7 or 8 seasons it's taken between 7-9 games for us to accumulate 12 points. Seems to me you're determined to make it as hard for him as possible instead of giving the guy a chance.

 

8 points from the first five games is a decent start and if maintained throughout the season would produce about 74 points in total which allowing for the deduction would see us comfortably safe on 62. Without the deduction that would probably see us in the play-offs.

 

1 hour ago, shandypants said:

Show the post then. 

Sorry Utah. I referenced tour post by mistake when I meant to reference Emiliannenko’s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Emilianenko said:

It’s there if you want to find it. Why should I have to prove myself for a wet wipe?

I don’t believe you pal. Anyway, you’ve conceded. Don’t bother replying. You’ve proven that you have no argument. I showed you the respect of responding fully. You’re not reciprocating. Don’t bother pal. As I said, you’re full of 5h1t. I’ve lost what little respect I had for you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, shandypants said:

I don’t believe you pal. Anyway, you’ve conceded. Don’t bother replying. You’ve proven that you have no argument. I showed you the respect of responding fully. You’re not reciprocating. Don’t bother pal. As I said, you’re full of 5h1t. I’ve lost what little respect I had for you. 

Why have I conceded? I have told you where the post is , it’s there for you or anyone else to see, Wet wipe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Emilianenko said:

Why have I conceded? I have told you where the post is , it’s there for you or anyone else to see, Wet wipe.

Because you won’t produce the proof. I did. Don’t bother replying. I don’t really care now. Post what you want. Call me whatever you like. I must say that it’s ruined my life that you’re calling me names now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, @owlstalk said:

 


Here's a perfect example of what I have just been talking about 👆

Frank Abagnale Jr was a con artist. He knew it, and did it for a reason.

He even made it appear glamorous and romantic. But he was no fool. Hence it took the powers that be so long to catch him. 


We are at the opposite end of the scale here.
 

Take comfort in the knowledge you’ve made your points consistently, if people choose to ignore them for their own self protection, there’s nothing you can do.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, shandypants said:

Because you won’t produce the proof. I did. Don’t bother replying. I don’t really care now. Post what you want. Call me whatever you like. I must say that it’s ruined my life that you’re calling me names now. 

Why do I need to produce the post? As stated it’s there for all to see. If you don’t like being called names, don’t state I’m full of poo .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what I can see...objectively speaking

 

@Emilianenko has expressed his concern about Monk and others disagree with him telling him to PROVE why they disagree with him 

 

Seems a bit backwards

 

For the record, and look at my previous posts, I'm for monk, what he wants to achieve and by and large the players he has brought in, but I also can understand why others may not be his biggest fan too.

 

At once saying "don't reference things last season" and at the same point using posts on a forum from last season to prove a point at best seems nonsensical

 

Proof will be on the pitch 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chris Apolon said:

For what I can see...objectively speaking

 

@Emilianenko has expressed his concern about Monk and others disagree with him telling him to PROVE why they disagree with him 

 

Seems a bit backwards

 

For the record, and look at my previous posts, I'm for monk, what he wants to achieve and by and large the players he has brought in, but I also can understand why others may not be his biggest fan too.

 

At once saying "don't reference things last season" and at the same point using posts on a forum from last season to prove a point at best seems nonsensical

 

Proof will be on the pitch 

Exactly. We have seen performances like the Cardiff and Birmingham ones last season , but not consistently.

We have two home games coming up. If we get good results from those then I would be more convinced by Monk. As it stands I still have my reservations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Emilianenko said:

Missing the point as usual .

No ime ignoring your point,not missing it,because your right,any opinion is valid,as just that....but you have diverged,i am simply refuting that monk 'dislikers' have never been able to show that they were consistent in their views of him.(ie season long,and not just post Xmas)..

Not one has been able to show me posts....from that time when we were doing well and third,that they thought he was a sh*te manager...

 

But i think i have made my point,simply cruel to keep pressing...

 

  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Emilianenko said:

Exactly. We have seen performances like the Cardiff and Birmingham ones last season , but not consistently.

We have two home games coming up. If we get good results from those then I would be more convinced by Monk. As it stands I still have my reservations.

 

I agree

 

Playing devils advocate there are some on here who refuse to provide the luxury of 10 games

 

Just think theres a degree of anger built up over 12 months from both sides of the manager that needs to be laid to rest until we see what happens

 

Just my thoughts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, parajack said:

No ime ignoring your point,not missing it,because your right,any opinion is valid,as just that....but you have diverged,i am simply refuting that monk 'dislikers' have never been able to show that they were consistent in their views of him.(ie season long,and not just post Xmas)..

Not one has been able to show me posts....from that time when we were doing well and third,that they thought he was a sh*te manager...

 

But i think i have made my point,simply cruel to keep pressing...

 

Alan Irvine had two great starts. 

I doubt anyone was criticising him at the time. Do you think he didn’t deserve criticism after because of the two great starts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Chris Apolon said:

For what I can see...objectively speaking

 

@Emilianenko has expressed his concern about Monk and others disagree with him telling him to PROVE why they disagree with him 

 

Seems a bit backwards

 

For the record, and look at my previous posts, I'm for monk, what he wants to achieve and by and large the players he has brought in, but I also can understand why others may not be his biggest fan too.

 

At once saying "don't reference things last season" and at the same point using posts on a forum from last season to prove a point at best seems nonsensical

 

Proof will be on the pitch 

I havnt asked him to prove anything,or anyone else for that matter,apart from their own credibility.....Constant barrages of monk,this that & the other,barrages of meaningless statistics proving nothing.Emilienko said people had responded to my request to show me that they had always thought monk a poor manager by posting such proof,but that i had ignored it.

 

I refuted this,and asked him to cut & paste said posts.......thats it....I and others,have repeatedly appealed for last season to be left in the history books,where it belongs,& to focus and concentrate on this season.

 

The threads & posts continue,and go on & on...look at thread 'madness'for the latest...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...