Jump to content

parajack

Member
  • Posts

    3,928
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by parajack

  1. 'OLD SCHOOL'......and bang on.....only thing missing is the affordability,thats where S6 is out of kilter....so is football in general in many ways now,no longer affordable for many,and football,our National game,should not only be available to a minority. We lose something as a society,when we lose that collective feeling of belonging,people have tatoo's are buried in their Clubs colours,because it MEANS something....
  2. Watched PELE play in that ground,and a whole host of other great memories,laughed,cried,cheered,booed...trudged home on many a Sat past the Park Hotel,& what was the lanes Cafe.... Its WAY more than a ground,its a thousand memorys to me and for DECADES was a fundamental part of every WeekEnd
  3. First season relegated with many Championship level players,and big salarys is our best chance to get back,it is not the time to start over tinkering or 'giving a manager time' (Rotherham & WW can do it,why not us?) Side 's with ambition dont do that.....Ipswich didn't **** about when plan 'A' didnt work.......,Blades didn't,because in my view of what i said above. Ipswich could see the writing on the wall,and our neighbours didn't want to lose the chance of an early return to the PL. Thats why DM has in the main had deserved criticism on here... He must now get this side into a play off position and keep us there for the remainder of the season,to salvage anything from this season,and any return to lessons not learned will spell disaster for both him,and us. Let us see what Sat brings..UP THE OWLS..and if failure beckons.....
  4. We have moaned when people were not sold at the right time whilst ever we are in L1 that time wont be right.... He gets inured this season? than there is next season....we need him
  5. Windass goes before season end,its game over for any hope of going up through the play offs
  6. Your right,i got mixed up,i knew what i meant but mispoke....he did play behind the forwards in a 10 role,at Cardiff and Patterson himself prefers that,ideally but he was brought in specifically as a forward only by GM
  7. Because we had NO forwards that were either available or in favour...same applied to Windass....you forgotten already the restrictions that GM had to contend with...
  8. Whats with this 'lower end of the table nonsense'??
  9. Not at SWFC he didnt....and he certainly wasn't brought in as a striker,but as an attacking midfielder who GM fancied could score the goals from that position that have been lacking...
  10. If he pass medical would be a good signing ide offer him season long contract with 12 Month extension if he stays fit on appearances... 18 Months at 32 for me would be a good offer,and appearances would protect us ...
  11. Agree smart piece of work by GM to spot him and utilise an attacking midfielder as an attacker,ditto Patterson....for which Monk has had little if any credit for...
  12. Going TBH here and did wonder about the 'motivation' of bringing him back by the manager & Chairman... who knows?
  13. Cost us more than that if we sell him...need to keep him,get Patterson scoring again with Gregory,and bring in less injury prone players for next season for a push for automatic promotion. BB needs replacing as Captain too,not Captain material.
  14. Its L1........something that sides have to cope with,when more matches are played than the Division above.. is what it is......not going to change and we need to WIN those games..
  15. Good post,pretty much agreeing with the OP but put in a more articulate manner,with reasoning.I have said consistently that this should be the case,many have disagreed,some vehemently,and site injuries and player unavailability,manager changes ,points deductions,not being paid....& Covid... My Q has always been 'how many of those things have happened this season'? only player injury's..& Covid ....All sides have had this to deal with DM should have done better with this squad,and we are now in a situation where we must have a run similar to Derby to close on the play off pack... DERBY 21 POINT DEDUCTION,fledgling manager in Rooney ,losing loan players,no guarantee they will even see Feb without selling players,or even still be in business.. For now lets give DM the credit for a good win,but also acknowledge we were unable to keep a 2 goal lead,and had to score 3 goals to win the match.... Derby killed off a SUFC side unbeaten in 5 games in similar circumstances and kept a clean sheet
  16. Top Rank,great Club in the 70s,later 'Barry Nobles ROXY....great memories....FIESTA just down the road biggest nightclub in EUROPE Halcyon days....
  17. Great result but we cant expect to give away a 2 goal lead and win 3-2 every game....should have been locked down at 2-0 and comfortable..... Worrying...
  18. Fit Windass should have been nailed on to score 20 goals a season,in L1 totally agree,even though we should remember he was a make shift Championship striker,from an attacking midfielder. I would have liked to see Windass and Gregory up front in a 2,with Patterson playing an attacking role behind them Would have fancied us to hammer anyone with that line up.
  19. Try replying to the post if you disagree,rather than the person posting it,makes better debate...exchanging insults is boring ta
  20. Yes they do,on the terms of the loan.....if SWFC are not doing what was agreed between the two parties,same would apply to any loan agreement terms,ie playing regularly,first team football,in an agreed role to develop the player....
  21. Agree but disagree on the player,on age grounds...it would be desperation indeed to look towards a 39 Year old ex Blade to come to our rescue...
  22. NO take me for a pint if you want,but dont ever take me for a fool....
×
×
  • Create New...