Lord Snooty Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 How? Just how? WTF?! Horrific. My eyes! My eyes! Bad - Lads had a stinker Below par - Not at his best today Bare minimum- Level no one should fall below Standard- Lads done ok today. Good - Played well Terrific - Made a good impact on the game Absolutley bloody marvelous - Showed why we pay all our lads £40pw I've just spaffed and will probably never see another performance like that in my life time. But ill be able to say I was here this day and witnessed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shandypants Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 Fox 7 Hector 6 Everyone else 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philb125 Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 I also thought Fox had a decent game. Growing in confidence and looking decent both in attack and defence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrosbyKitchens Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 Dawson - 6 nothing to do. Palmer - 4 Lees - 7 thankfully didn't put a foot wrong. Hector - 3 looked pissed up. Fox - 5 poor crossing otherwise ok again. Boyd - 5 worked hard, poor touches. Bannan - 6 offered little Pelupessy - 1 pointless. Reach - 7 best player in a poor game. Matias - 4 would expect more Fletcher - 6 should have scored after 2 mins, would have been easy from there. Nuhiu - 2 did nothing. Winnall - 4 ran about a bit. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrosbyKitchens Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 2 minutes ago, shandypants said: Fox 7 Hector 6 Everyone else 5 Hector was awful! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonnyowl Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 1 minute ago, CrosbyKitchens said: Dawson - 6 nothing to do. Palmer - 4 Lees - 7 thankfully didn't put a foot wrong. Hector - 3 looked pissed up. Fox - 5 poor crossing otherwise ok again. Boyd - 5 worked hard, poor touches. Bannan - 6 offered little Pelupessy - 1 pointless. Reach - 7 best player in a poor game. Matias - 4 would expect more Fletcher - 6 should have scored after 2 mins, would have been easy from there. Nuhiu - 2 did nothing. Winnall - 4 ran about a bit. Reach 7? You part of his fan club? 4 at most, awful!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shandypants Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 (edited) 4 minutes ago, CrosbyKitchens said: Hector was awful! This is from someone that gave Reach a 7! Are your eyes painted on? Edit: Fvvck me! I’ve just seen you’ve given Fox a low score! Were you there?!! Edited January 5, 2019 by shandypants Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shandypants Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 Just now, jonnyowl said: Reach 7? You part of his fan club? 4 at most, awful!! Agreed. He had an awful game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owl in Nottingham Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 1 minute ago, shandypants said: Agreed. He had an awful game. Awful is a bit over the top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plonk Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 All opinions isn’t it. Thought Hec made a couple of mistakes but was otherwise very good. Fox got in some great positions and delivered absolutely nothing. Very frustrating Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shandypants Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 1 minute ago, Owl in Nottingham said: Awful is a bit over the top. Ok. I’ll reword. Reach was well below his standards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldrick Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 Reach looked frustrated at constantly giving the ball away, culminating in a silly booking Not his best day at the office but he wasn’t alone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owl in Nottingham Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 2 minutes ago, shandypants said: Ok. I’ll reword. Reach was well below his standards. Yes in many ways he was. In some phases of play he seemed to be his usual hard working self. And he did put some decent balls through. He has a couple of shots that were way off and then seemed to fade. But to be fair there was just not enough movement around him. Now compare that to the game against Brum. On that occasion he had Boyd taking on players and Matais working hard. That does change things. I felt we were expecting too much if we thought Reach could unlock today's game on his own. So yes disappointing but not awful from him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrosbyKitchens Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 11 minutes ago, Baldrick said: Reach looked frustrated at constantly giving the ball away, culminating in a silly booking Not his best day at the office but he wasn’t alone He should have been frustrated it was a blatant foul on him moments before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrosbyKitchens Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 (edited) 23 minutes ago, shandypants said: This is from someone that gave Reach a 7! Are your eyes painted on? Edit: Fvvck me! I’ve just seen you’ve given Fox a low score! Were you there?!! No I watched it on live TV with close ups and replays. Fox was OK, but his crossing was poor. Thought Reach was trying more than anyone else, and he was involved in just about everything positive we did. Almost won it on his own with another wonder goal as well. I didn't see Fox flick it over a defender's head, control it and volley it all in one move. Edited January 5, 2019 by CrosbyKitchens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenitoCarbone Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 Dawson - not much to do - 6 Full backs - Ok defensively, awful crossing - both 6 Lees - Solid, our best - 7 Hector - Looked tired - 5 Reach - Varies - 6 Bannan - Also varies a lot -6 Hutch - Shame - N/A Pessy - Terrible - 4 Matias - Tried and had good runs - 6 Boyd - Ok, but not matchfit - 6 Fletch - Worked hard, but didn’t pay off - 6 Winnall - Same as Fletch - 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torres Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 28 minutes ago, shandypants said: Fox 7 Hector 6 Everyone else 5 Fox wasn’t the worst I’ll grant you that BUT 7 out of 10 for that performance is quite ridiculous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torres Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 18 minutes ago, Baldrick said: Reach looked frustrated at constantly giving the ball away, culminating in a silly booking Not his best day at the office but he wasn’t alone He was absolutely garbage until the last 5 minutes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrosbyKitchens Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 26 minutes ago, shandypants said: This is from someone that gave Reach a 7! Are your eyes painted on? Edit: Fvvck me! I’ve just seen you’ve given Fox a low score! Were you there?!! Watch the game again. Against a decent side, Hector would have cost us the game today, he was all over the place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torres Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 27 minutes ago, shandypants said: Ok. I’ll reword. Reach was well below his standards. Correction, he was the same as he always is, just without a goal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now