jayzman Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 Think he meant Deeney... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark.flem Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 Joe Garner is the one with most potential I'd say Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roscoe P. Coltrane Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 Rhodes would be a colossus for us . Sorry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOOTIE AND THE SHIT TU Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 I think Wickham is twice the player, for half the money. Vote Wickham. Just a bloke, who used up all his luck in one go when he met his wife. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dangeroustom Posted March 11, 2015 Author Share Posted March 11, 2015 Yes.............consider this though Wickhams wages alone would put 3mill a year onto his cost! per year! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wilyfox Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 If Wickham is on 60k/week, I don't see how he could be considered a cheaper alternative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LocomotiveOwlerton Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 Think he meant Deeney... Nah, Feeney's coming back. Desperate for a second chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dangeroustom Posted March 11, 2015 Author Share Posted March 11, 2015 That's 60k x 3 year contract = 9.360mill. plus fee at least 6-8mill = 15mill plus. Hmmmm road to ruin. pass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oh_weds_we_love_you Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 Yes.............consider this though Wickhams wages alone would put 3mill a year onto his cost! per year! But Rhodes is on a reported £2m a year salary! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nevthelodgemoorowl Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 Jordan Rhodes would fit very well in a well oiled silky team, we are not that team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oh_weds_we_love_you Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 I think Wickham is twice the player, for half the money. Vote Wickham. I doubt Wickham would be available for half of Rhodes' fee (and salary). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dangeroustom Posted March 11, 2015 Author Share Posted March 11, 2015 Yeah I think pass on Rhodes too. We've only just escaped from financial ruin. Not saying I'm opposed to such players but I'd rather we are still here in another few years time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelowl Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 If Wickham is on 60k/week, I don't see how he could be considered a cheaper alternative. Wily I see the IF in your post but do you know where that figure came from ? seems high to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parkerowl Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 if it was 12m over a 4 year deal id go for it if we could Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oh_weds_we_love_you Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 if it was 12m over a 4 year deal id go for it if we could That would make the transfer fee £4m; half of what Blackburn paid! Wily I see the IF in your post but do you know where that figure came from ? seems high to me Was his reported new contract terms signed in the summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airborne_rat_of_s6 Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 We all would Every club in the championship would How do you know you're signing the next Rhodes, Ings etc.? Personally I think we've got one in Lavery. This^^^^^^^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wilyfox Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 Wily I see the IF in your post but do you know where that figure came from ? seems high to me http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/connor-wickham-signs-new-sunderland-4776070 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiJ Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 Signing Jordan Rhodes for 12 million would probably be more a statement of stupidity than one of intent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parkerowl Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 That would make the transfer fee £4m; half of what Blackburn paid! Was his reported new contract terms signed in the summer. He's been on the bench alot lately though, they arent in a financial position to play hardball he's on 35k a week and 5 grand a goal. they cannot afford to have that wage on the books no more. he was signed hoping to fire them straight back up, he hasn't. and they cant afford him anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ItzzOwl Posted March 11, 2015 Share Posted March 11, 2015 Personally if we have that type of money to spend, i think the main aim is to add some depth to the squad, have a bit more competition for players! Look what happened to Fulham, spent big on one player and still could face the drop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now