Guest cypress hill Posted September 25, 2012 Share Posted September 25, 2012 Didn't play tonight because of a back spasm i'm not suprised, the amount of time he has to pick the ball out of the flippingnet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Almat Posted September 25, 2012 Share Posted September 25, 2012 (edited) Agreed. If DJ has said Kirkland has a back spasm when he hasn't that's cruel. Hope it's not how it happened. Edited September 25, 2012 by Almat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest cypress hill Posted September 25, 2012 Share Posted September 25, 2012 he'l be in a wheelchair by christmas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i used to be sc_owl Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 A bit of a coincidence that he has a back spasm between Saturday evening and Tuesday evening. Back problems are never nice though. Hope Kirkland recovers quickly regardless of who I think should play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smhouston Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 No he wasn't Dave Jones said he was gonna keep the same team but had no choice but to change it.. Check OS So where has he actually said Kirkland was injured with a back spasm? I can't find it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smhouston Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 So where has he actually said Kirkland was injured with a back spasm? I can't find it Just found it. I doubt DJ would lie about an injury. TBH I would have expected near enough the same team playing last night as they did on Saturday simply to try and get some consistency and get something gelling together. Obviously this was a no go though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorian gray Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 i see bywater wasn't the answer then... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Briscoe Inferno Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 i see bywater wasn't the answer then... But he pulled off some fantastic saves, nearly saved the penalty and took responsibility & marshalled the defence very well. Including putting players on the posts at corners.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG D Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 'nearly saved a penalty' Kirkland did save one last week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorian gray Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 (edited) But he pulled off some fantastic saves, nearly saved the penalty and took responsibility & marshalled the defence very well. Including putting players on the posts at corners.... hahahaha! i'm not quite sure that putting defenders on posts for corners will have been bywater's brainwave after last weekends debacle... as for nearly saved the penalty, i didn't see it, but heard it on the radio... the commentator said "HE'S SAVED IT, OH! NO, it's gone in, he should have saved that"... i said at the time, "i bet he wasn't ready, he'd be marshalling the side into it's places around the box, so it could best get in for the rebound when he saved it"... the trouble with making bywater into a peter shilton, was always going to leak water when push came to shove... Edited September 26, 2012 by dnhc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trevdi9 Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 so it bounced in after he saved it ,could have bounced away from goal ,just bad luck on that one , Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stocksyuto Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 the lad wears a back brace when hes playing, you could see it when he pulled off a save against millwall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelowl Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 back spasms if real reason he didnt play aren't funny - I suffered for years with em disables you diving around and stretching it must be a nightmare. Acuncture defo helped me and I think he's thrown the kitchen sink at trying to solve it but imho taking a goalie on with that prob still unsorted was and now is a stupid gamble Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest insideowl Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 when signing a player with kirklands injury record, reacurances is always going to be an issue. Same applies for Gardner. Hope its not true for Kirklands sake but i'm more than confident in bywaters ability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 (edited) this iis why I always said the signing of Kirkland didn't make sense. In the summer there were a multitude of decent goalies about without degrenerative injuries. Fair play to him for making it six years after he was pretty much told to retire. Have you got coverage for Bywater? Edited September 26, 2012 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trevdi9 Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 well according to some we may need it because bywater is'nt good enough, Baggiehy mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 (edited) well according to some we may need it because bywater is'nt good enough, Baggiehy mate The first post I made when I heard you'd signed him was my one and only troll i made in 1200 posts and that was basically because I couldn't believe you'd signed him. In a time when you're strengthening, like the summer Trev. He's too much of a risk. i understand how everybody got excired, because, he's a "name" who once played for England. Fairplay, I can see that. But its not the end of September and the Back spasms have already kicked in. Is he a luxary Wednesday can afford? As for Bywater certainly good enough for the championship. Is Weaver still there mate? Edited September 26, 2012 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
POWP Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 re: kirkland dropped because of a back spasm: maybe it's more that the long journey coupled with the game wouldn't be worth the risk. Especially when the league is more important? But then the same report says taylor and Barkley were injured and not cup tied, and I'd presume that's a mistake so I don't know what to believe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSlicer Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 Angelina? Nope guess again... Mila Kunis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 26, 2012 Share Posted September 26, 2012 we let a decent young keeper go to chez vegas Who was that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now