Weshallovercome Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 (edited) Can you deal with constructive criticism ? http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=581 out of focus - no discerning focal point... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=582 misuse of flash - no focal point ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=591 underexposed - no discening focal point .... 2/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=610 as per number 2 ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=641 no thought for composition ...underexposed by a stop ... 3/10 for sentimentality http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=642 no comment ... 0/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=643 no thought for composition... where is the focal point ... cropped imperfection ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=645 no no no. where's the compostion ? subject matter needs arranging before a photograph is taken... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=664 best one so far... but not cropped... 4/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=679 fisheye lens ... but composition is lacking, main focal point "SWFC" is cut off ... 3.5/10 for trying http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=680 should have used fish eye lens ... is Hillsborough a two sided ground? ... 3/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=681 composition ... misuse of flash ... "entranc" ... sorry. poor ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=682 where's the cropping ? background is filthy and unappealing ... 0.5/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=698 and ... misuse of flash... no composition ... aperture incorrect... 0/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=699 not straight... no focal point ... no composition ... no flash used ... 0/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=730 shocking... metering totally wrong ... underexposed stand, overexposed sky ... sparse foreground ... -1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=731 forget sentimentality ... wrong exposure... wrong aperture... no composition... 2/10 (sentimental reasons) http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=745 and... it's a board... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=747 subject matter ?? composition... aperture ... 0/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=748 misuse of flash (again) ... composition stilted ... poor ... a lazy photograph ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=756 another "lazy" photograph ... composition... light (wrong exposure) ... focal point ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=757 captain's armband... why isn't that the focal point ?? ... composition ... aperture ... all wrong... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=776 not straight... not symmetrical... wrong aperture ... 0/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=829 abstract... one of the better ones on show... underexposed though ... 2.5/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=844 not straight... wrong side of players ... underexposed ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=909 underexposed (again) ... composition incorrect ... 2/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=910 composition incorrect ... wrong aperture ... subject matter is weak ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=912 very weak... no emphasis on subject matter ... OOF reflection in window ... not good... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=913 wrong aperture.. overexposed in places ... composition better than most ... 2/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=916 weak composition... if you're going to have the othr emblems on show, show them, if not, crop ... 1.5 / 10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=501 misuse of flash ... underexposed ... weak composition ... lacks strength - no focal point ... 0/10 I think i've said enough, the rest on show all have similar points as those that I have rated. I've been honest in my opinion, I hope you're not offended by my comments. Overall, If I was running a multi-million pound operation, I'd have photographs taken professionally. As a promotion for Sheffield Wednesday and with a web presence, I feel they are a poor attempt. By the way, my grandpa 1.8.6.7 taught me about photography, he's a brilliant photographer, but is too weak on his feet to get out much these days. *realises my life isn't that bad after all* p.s.....I smell pig. Edited March 1, 2010 by Weshallovercome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O_D_A Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 I was going to offer an alternative, considered retort to 1.8.6.7's critique However, the schedule of having sex with an actual woman prevented me from doing so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReadingOwl Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 The penny has dropped! This a wind up. You've got me. Kick a man when he is down. Good one. UTO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FAT OWL Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 I was going to offer an alternative, considered retort to 1.8.6.7's critique However, the schedule of having sex with an actual woman prevented me from doing so Get over... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weshallovercome Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 Get over... He didn't mention anything about her having a pulse..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CampbellOwl-36 Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=581 out of focus - no discerning focal point... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=582 misuse of flash - no focal point ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=591 underexposed - no discening focal point .... 2/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=610 as per number 2 ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=641 no thought for composition ...underexposed by a stop ... 3/10 for sentimentality http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=642 no comment ... 0/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=643 no thought for composition... where is the focal point ... cropped imperfection ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=645 no no no. where's the compostion ? subject matter needs arranging before a photograph is taken... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=664 best one so far... but not cropped... 4/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=679 fisheye lens ... but composition is lacking, main focal point "SWFC" is cut off ... 3.5/10 for trying http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=680 should have used fish eye lens ... is Hillsborough a two sided ground? ... 3/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=681 composition ... misuse of flash ... "entranc" ... sorry. poor ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=682 where's the cropping ? background is filthy and unappealing ... 0.5/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=698 and ... misuse of flash... no composition ... aperture incorrect... 0/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=699 not straight... no focal point ... no composition ... no flash used ... 0/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=730 shocking... metering totally wrong ... underexposed stand, overexposed sky ... sparse foreground ... -1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=731 forget sentimentality ... wrong exposure... wrong aperture... no composition... 2/10 (sentimental reasons) http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=745 and... it's a board... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=747 subject matter ?? composition... aperture ... 0/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=748 misuse of flash (again) ... composition stilted ... poor ... a lazy photograph ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=756 another "lazy" photograph ... composition... light (wrong exposure) ... focal point ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=757 captain's armband... why isn't that the focal point ?? ... composition ... aperture ... all wrong... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=776 not straight... not symmetrical... wrong aperture ... 0/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=829 abstract... one of the better ones on show... underexposed though ... 2.5/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=844 not straight... wrong side of players ... underexposed ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=909 underexposed (again) ... composition incorrect ... 2/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=910 composition incorrect ... wrong aperture ... subject matter is weak ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=912 very weak... no emphasis on subject matter ... OOF reflection in window ... not good... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=913 wrong aperture.. overexposed in places ... composition better than most ... 2/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=916 weak composition... if you're going to have the othr emblems on show, show them, if not, crop ... 1.5 / 10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=501 misuse of flash ... underexposed ... weak composition ... lacks strength - no focal point ... 0/10 I think i've said enough, the rest on show all have similar points as those that I have rated. I've been honest in my opinion, I hope you're not offended by my comments. Overall, If I was running a multi-million pound operation, I'd have photographs taken professionally. As a promotion for Sheffield Wednesday and with a web presence, I feel they are a poor attempt. By the way, my grandpa 1.8.6.7 taught me about photography, he's a brilliant photographer, but is too weak on his feet to get out much these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam779 Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 He didn't mention anything about her having a pulse.....Or a choice... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeJayOne Posted March 1, 2010 Author Share Posted March 1, 2010 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=581 out of focus - no discerning focal point... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=582 misuse of flash - no focal point ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=591 underexposed - no discening focal point .... 2/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=610 as per number 2 ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=641 no thought for composition ...underexposed by a stop ... 3/10 for sentimentality http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=642 no comment ... 0/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=643 no thought for composition... where is the focal point ... cropped imperfection ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=645 no no no. where's the compostion ? subject matter needs arranging before a photograph is taken... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=664 best one so far... but not cropped... 4/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=679 fisheye lens ... but composition is lacking, main focal point "SWFC" is cut off ... 3.5/10 for trying http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=680 should have used fish eye lens ... is Hillsborough a two sided ground? ... 3/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=681 composition ... misuse of flash ... "entranc" ... sorry. poor ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=682 where's the cropping ? background is filthy and unappealing ... 0.5/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=698 and ... misuse of flash... no composition ... aperture incorrect... 0/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=699 not straight... no focal point ... no composition ... no flash used ... 0/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=730 shocking... metering totally wrong ... underexposed stand, overexposed sky ... sparse foreground ... -1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=731 forget sentimentality ... wrong exposure... wrong aperture... no composition... 2/10 (sentimental reasons) http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=745 and... it's a board... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=747 subject matter ?? composition... aperture ... 0/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=748 misuse of flash (again) ... composition stilted ... poor ... a lazy photograph ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=756 another "lazy" photograph ... composition... light (wrong exposure) ... focal point ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=757 captain's armband... why isn't that the focal point ?? ... composition ... aperture ... all wrong... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=776 not straight... not symmetrical... wrong aperture ... 0/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=829 abstract... one of the better ones on show... underexposed though ... 2.5/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=844 not straight... wrong side of players ... underexposed ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=909 underexposed (again) ... composition incorrect ... 2/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=910 composition incorrect ... wrong aperture ... subject matter is weak ... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=912 very weak... no emphasis on subject matter ... OOF reflection in window ... not good... 1/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=913 wrong aperture.. overexposed in places ... composition better than most ... 2/10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=916 weak composition... if you're going to have the othr emblems on show, show them, if not, crop ... 1.5 / 10 http://www.ourwednesday.com/photos/photo.h...=91#photoid=501 misuse of flash ... underexposed ... weak composition ... lacks strength - no focal point ... 0/10 I think i've said enough, the rest on show all have similar points as those that I have rated. I've been honest in my opinion, I hope you're not offended by my comments. Overall, If I was running a multi-million pound operation, I'd have photographs taken professionally. As a promotion for Sheffield Wednesday and with a web presence, I feel they are a poor attempt. By the way, my grandpa 1.8.6.7 taught me about photography, he's a brilliant photographer, but is too weak on his feet to get out much these days. Thanks - some interesting comments and feedback. Not having a go back or anything, and do appreciate your comments - but I will just point out that they are not done in a professional way and never were intended to be (I'm not a pro photographer and would never even claim to be 'decent'). The Daily Photo's are indeed done for fun and are never intended for print or use anywhere other than on a casual feature on the site. In fact, it's a case of going out each day with a crappy old digital camera and spending less than 10 seconds taking a quick snap before getting back to the office and uploading it without much bother. All that said, I'll bear your comments in mind. SHEFFIELD SHOP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russy Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 Well I like the photos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeJayOne Posted March 1, 2010 Author Share Posted March 1, 2010 *considers dissecting all of 1.8.6.7's posts and adding a critique of each* SHEFFIELD SHOP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodger Wylde Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 *considers dissecting all of 1.8.6.7's posts and adding a critique of each* Mr DJ, dont stoop to their level! You pictures are received in the manner they are meant which is a bit of light relief. You know I love you and you are still my great big Teddy bear!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CampbellOwl-36 Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 *considers dissecting all of 1.8.6.7's posts and adding a critique of each* I'd rather you shoved the camera up his arse, take a photo and make him critiscise that.* *No real harm intended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Deleted member Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 Thanks - some interesting comments and feedback. Not having a go back or anything, and do appreciate your comments - but I will just point out that they are not done in a professional way and never were intended to be (I'm not a pro photographer and would never even claim to be 'decent'). The Daily Photo's are indeed done for fun and are never intended for print or use anywhere other than on a casual feature on the site. In fact, it's a case of going out each day with a crappy old digital camera and spending less than 10 seconds taking a quick snap before getting back to the office and uploading it without much bother. All that said, I'll bear your comments in mind. :laugh: :laugh: *knows that DJ1 is hurting right now and tries not to enjoy 1867's obvious comedy post* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russy Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 This is being led by Sheffield Wednesday, however Leicester have shown a desire to take part. They have already used their one 'reverse kit' allowed under football league rules with the rememberence day poppy shirt they used, however they are talking to the Football League to see if they can wear the HFH logo too, I understand Surely for things like these they should be allowed to do it when ever. Just out of interest what classes as a "reverse kit"? Can you have a whole new shirt for one game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeJayOne Posted March 1, 2010 Author Share Posted March 1, 2010 Surely for things like these they should be allowed to do it when ever. Just out of interest what classes as a "reverse kit"? Can you have a whole new shirt for one game? Yep, basically you can modify your existing kit (i.e. adding the charity badge), or you can change the whole kit completely for just one game (i.e. like Huddersfield Town did for one game recently) - that's a 'reverse kit'. SHEFFIELD SHOP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russy Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 (edited) Yep, basically you can modify your existing kit (i.e. adding the charity badge), or you can change the whole kit completely for just one game (i.e. like Huddersfield Town did for one game recently) - that's a 'reverse kit'. Ah right thats cool, be good if we could do one for any anniversary that may be coming up. Bit silly that you can only modify your kit once but WBA can have a different sponsor every time they are on TV. Also I know in US sports they sometimes have throwback jersey weekends which would be good. Edited March 1, 2010 by russy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJMortimer Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 Yep, basically you can modify your existing kit (i.e. adding the charity badge), or you can change the whole kit completely for just one game (i.e. like Huddersfield Town did for one game recently) - that's a 'reverse kit'. Shouldn't you be studying photography at Uni or something you bloody amateur? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pahowl Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 A bucket collection will be held on Saturday for "Help the Heroes" if anyone wants to help in a BIG way by helping with the collection then please PM me or email me paul.holmes@wednesdayite.com with your name,DOB, email address, phone number, Please note you need to be over 18 to help. A complimentry match day ticket will be given to all those assisting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Deleted member Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 I will help do this - and I will donate the matchday ticket to the first person who puts £20 in the bucket Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beevtakessomelickin Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 I know the likes of Villa have charity shirt logos (Acorn Hospice) but have any got 2 charity logos? This is all good but we are not a bloody advertising agency and need to play some football and get 3 points, that drivel I watched on Saturday was diabolical, we need a miracle on Saturday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now