Jump to content

50 up for Atdhe


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Manwë said:

FF scored 40 goals in five seasons for us.  8 a season on average.

 

I wonder who cost us more in fees, wages and hassle.

 

Your comparing bad with bad, dunt make it any more palatable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Therealrealist
5 minutes ago, Manwë said:

FF scored 40 goals in five seasons for us.  8 a season on average.

 

I wonder who cost us more in fees, wages and hassle.

If reda was still here he wud av out scored both of them...for half the price

Edited by Therealrealist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest gizowl
5 minutes ago, daleblue said:

 

It's 8.3 dont knock the bloke when he's down.

What's Rhodes stats for his 40k a week and Fletcher for his 35k a week and he couldn't even be arsed to stick around for another month to help us out in our time of need. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, daleblue said:

 

You've got to be having a laugh,

if we keep him, then that makes our Club one with no ambition.


A substitute who gets around 8 goals a season from the 25-15 mins he plays. Sounds awful.

 

Unless we can get the same for less we should be keeping him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Beighton Owl 87 said:

He can do no right can he? Two goals in 45 mins and people still knock him. He's the only forward we've got capable of scoring at the minute. 

 

Just because we have shiter strikers dunt mean you can fawn all over him.

We need better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Therealrealist said:

If reda was still here he wud av out scored both of them...for half the price

He scored 19 in 4 seasons.  So less than 5 goals a season on average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest gizowl
6 minutes ago, daleblue said:

 

Your comparing bad with bad, dunt make it any more palatable.

And who in your opinion is the good to compare him with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bluesteel said:


A substitute who gets around 8 goals a season from the 25-15 mins he plays. Sounds awful.

 

Unless we can get the same for less we should be keeping him. 

 

Your talking nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ChinaOwl said:

 

I would think the club's entire goal return has got worse most seasons since 2016. Of the club's entire goal return in that time, I would think that Nuhiu's contribution has increased.

You couldnt be more wrong...his contribution after the first two seasons has roughly halved

 

16 out of 106 goals (15%) in the league for the first 2 seasons compared to 24 out 302 (8%) since

 

Another myth debunked

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, gizowl said:

What's Rhodes stats for his 40k a week and Fletcher for his 35k a week and he couldn't even be arsed to stick around for another month to help us out in our time of need. 

 

Why do you ask questions about other crap players?

We are talking about Nuhiu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, daleblue said:

 

So once again it's not the strikers fault for his goal ratio, its because blah blah blah blah.

Fed up with excuses,

 

8.3 goals a Season for a striker. 

 

JUST LET THAT SINK IN.

And what is Rhodes' strike rate?

 

We have two senior strikers at the club (after Wickham's loan ends). Nuhiu offers far, far more than Rhodes both in terms of goals and all round play. Said in another thread if people are against giving him a new 1 year deal and thinking we are going to bring in 4 strikers of better quality than Nuhiu, they are living in absolute dream world.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Manwë said:

He scored 19 in 4 seasons.  So less than 5 goals a season on average.

So because a centre forward who takes penalties scores on average 2 goals a season more than a defender that we let go, it proves he's worth keeping........brilliant arguement

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ian said:

You couldnt be more wrong...his contribution after the first two seasons has roughly halved

 

16 out of 106 goals (15%) in the league for the first 2 seasons compared to 24 out 302 (8%) since

 

Another myth debunked

 

Well, footbal stats are something that I am not too hot on or really care about other than outscoring the opposition or in terms of league position so I won't argue,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Beighton Owl 87 said:

We do need better but as an impact sub he contributes. Wouldn't be against giving him a new deal especially if we do end up in League 1.

 

NO, JUST NO, stop it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...