@owlstalk Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalthamOwl Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 (edited) Can’t really blame them (as long as they are all above board when they are sent in) Edited May 4, 2020 by WalthamOwl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soldierboyblue Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 (edited) 12 minutes ago, @owlstalk said: Maguire has an agenda against us I'm afraid always seems to be an agenda and I had more than a few 'discussions' with him when I was still on twitter edited to add how can you hide behind rules? Edited May 4, 2020 by soldierboyblue 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@owlstalk Posted May 4, 2020 Author Share Posted May 4, 2020 3 minutes ago, soldierboyblue said: Maguire has an agenda against us I'm afraid Oh god.. Here we go.. Attack the pundit time... Owlstalk Shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soldierboyblue Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 Just now, @owlstalk said: Oh god.. Here we go.. Attack the pundit time... Just my personal experience of trying to have a chat with him Neil. When asked a number of questions on Twitter he can't back things up and just comes out with the same old tag line. I don't mind the club getting hammered when there is reason to but as I have always said back it up with facts. The 'Hiding behind rules' quote says all IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BARMYARMY2010 Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 Can take or leave what he says and how he interprets things, but when he put in print that SWFC had broken the law with regards to the filing of the last set of accounts, I tend not to put any weight behind anything he does say or write. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soldierboyblue Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 2 minutes ago, BARMYARMY2010 said: Can take or leave what he says and how he interprets things, but when he put in print that SWFC had broken the law with regards to the filing of the last set of accounts, I tend not to put any weight behind anything he does say or write. That was one of the things I asked how have we broken the law and it was met with nothing but conjecture by him. We haven't broken the law as you know otherwise HMRC and the plod would be on us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FroggattOwls Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 He’s never been a qualified professional account has he? Or any experience of accounting ‘in the real world’. Don’t know why people hang off his every word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0114 Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 Says only 4 clubs in the top 2 divisions have extended their accounts. Newcastle, Crystal Palace, Derby and ourselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick_Turpin Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 1 minute ago, BARMYARMY2010 said: Can take or leave what he says and how he interprets things, but when he put in print that SWFC had broken the law with regards to the filing of the last set of accounts, I tend not to put any weight behind anything he does say or write. Did he mean because we filed them late? That is an offence. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sherlyegg Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 A late filing penalty is a civil penalty and not a criminal offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wilyfox Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 I've calculated our overspend to be 4284727413 billion dollars. We're hoping to loan Jordan Rhodes to help get around this, on top of lifetime season tickets for £179,000 each. Take advantage of that wonderful offer. Early bird deadline set at June 30. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FroggattOwls Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 9 minutes ago, rickygoo said: Did he mean because we filed them late? That is an offence. We didn’t file them late. SWFC changed the filing date. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mcguigan Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 Don’t know why he’s so puzzled. Well, it’s unlikely our turnover has increased much. It’s unlikely our outgoings have changed much. So all he’d have to do is look at our last set of accounts and deduct the stadium profit, voila 18/19 accounts. Probably a £35m loss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick_Turpin Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 13 minutes ago, sherlyegg said: A late filing penalty is a civil penalty and not a criminal offense. That's what I thought and then I read this https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/late-filing-penalties/late-filing-penalties Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick_Turpin Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 (edited) 15 minutes ago, FroggattOwls said: We didn’t file them late. SWFC changed the filing date. We changed the date - and then submitted them late based on the new date. According to:-https://www.thestar.co.uk/sport/football/sheffield-wednesday/latest-owls-news/what-soft-transfer-embargo-and-what-does-it-mean-sheffield-wednesday-177757 Edited May 4, 2020 by rickygoo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 31 minutes ago, @owlstalk said: Oh god.. Here we go.. Attack the pundit time... Why would he say 'hidden behind the rules'? The rules are in place for a reason - we are abiding the rules, just as many others will be - it is not hiding. Maguire has previously made some less than veiled barbed comments against the club, including using some some of acrostic hidden message in one of his articles to make a childish comment against Chansiri. Some of his reporting may be accurate but sometimes the way he reports it shows he is sticking the knife in rather than providing critical analysis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick_Turpin Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 1 minute ago, hirstyboywonder said: Maguire has previously made some less than veiled barbed comments against the club, including using some some of acrostic hidden message in one of his articles to make a childish comment against Chansiri. He does that all the time not just about Chansiri. He thinks it's clever when it's clearly anything but. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 7 minutes ago, rickygoo said: That's what I thought and then I read this https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/late-filing-penalties/late-filing-penalties The reality is we were a long way off any such sanctions of a criminal nature being taken on that basis and as usual Maguire was being sensationalist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick_Turpin Posted May 4, 2020 Share Posted May 4, 2020 7 minutes ago, rickygoo said: That's what I thought and then I read this https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/late-filing-penalties/late-filing-penalties I think there's a distinction between the company and the directors of the company. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now