Jump to content

Transfer restrictions


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Broncolives said:

I keep read that we are under a transfer restriction which says we can’t actually buy players. Can someone show where this has come from and the actual restriction.

There are no transfer restrictions imposed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, King_Monkey said:

Can sign players on Free transfers

or loan however due to not paying wages in full for 4 consecutive months, the club have been told to get their cash flow in order and that means they are barred from spending any money on transfers. It also means that any bids made for players that are received have to be notified to the EFL and a reason given as to why they are being rejected if indeed they are.

This one 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Mcguigan
10 hours ago, Triple O said:

If it is true but I'll need more convincing. If indeed the EFL has placed us under these restrictions they are doing a good job of hiding it as I can't find any official reference to it.

Sanctions don’t have to be disclosed to anyone other than the director/owner of the club and the EFL. If they want keep that from the fans, that’s up to them.

 

My thoughts are that, firstly people focus on the £39m or £13m a season losses threshold as the first reference point when, in reality, that is the upper threshold for losses that result in points deductions and hard sanctions ie full transfer embargo’s.

 

There are also punishments for breaching the lower losses threshold, which is £15m over 3 seasons, such as the one we are currently in ie a soft embargo where we can sign players but only to the EFL’s guidelines.DC will have had to agreed to this or face further sanctions.

 

He is probably happy to adhere, hence why people think it’s the clubs own decision not imposed by the EFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Mcguigan said:

Sanctions don’t have to be disclosed to anyone other than the director/owner of the club and the EFL. If they want keep that from the fans, that’s up to them.

 

My thoughts are that, firstly people focus on the £39m or £13m a season losses threshold as the first reference point when, in reality, that is the upper threshold for losses that result in points deductions and hard sanctions ie full transfer embargo’s.

 

There are also punishments for breaching the lower losses threshold, which is £15m over 3 seasons, such as the one we are currently in ie a soft embargo where we can sign players but only to the EFL’s guidelines.DC will have had to agreed to this or face further sanctions.

 

He is probably happy to adhere, hence why people think it’s the clubs own decision not imposed by the EFL.

Don't think that's totally right.

The £15m threshold can be funded by loans etc to the club but anything beyond that has to be gifted by the owner.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, King_Monkey said:

Standard practice to be fair. Birmingham City we’re hit with same punishment some time ago. At that time they rejected a bid of £6m for Che Adam’s. The EFL wanted to punish them as it was against their instruction and imposed business plan. Birmingham fought it and won and 6 months later they sold him to Southampton for £15m

EFL doing the best for clubs yet again. Not fit to run the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Mcguigan
11 minutes ago, Triple O said:

Don't think that's totally right.

The £15m threshold can be funded by loans etc to the club but anything beyond that has to be gifted by the owner.

It’s totally right mate.

 

The thresholds regarding what you are and aren’t permitted to lose have nothing to do with how they are covered. P&S regulations are about losses not how you fund them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Therealrealist
14 hours ago, Broncolives said:

I keep read that we are under a transfer restriction which says we can’t actually buy players. Can someone show where this has come from and the actual restriction.

We are skint..that’s our restriction..we wer never goin to be buying players this summer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Know it’s been said already but EFL name & shame clubs under embargo here:

https://www.efl.com/-more/governance/embargoes

We aren’t on the list either it’s self  imposed (transfer window deals will be telling in the absence of a club statement?), or the rumour mill is wrong, or the EFL isn’t being as transparent as it says it is in these things.

 

Oh for the days of a pie & pint, average players with big hearts battling it out on a muddy pitch & getting soaked on the kop - things were much simpler then!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, King_Monkey said:

Standard practice to be fair. Birmingham City we’re hit with same punishment some time ago. At that time they rejected a bid of £6m for Che Adam’s. The EFL wanted to punish them as it was against their instruction and imposed business plan. Birmingham fought it and won and 6 months later they sold him to Southampton for £15m

Shows how fizzed up the modern game is if this is considered standard practice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mcguigan said:

It’s totally right mate.

 

The thresholds regarding what you are and aren’t permitted to lose have nothing to do with how they are covered. P&S regulations are about losses not how you fund them.

Not according to this.

 

There are a number key changes:

The assessment is carried out in March (rather than December)

The maximum loss limit is now £13m per Championship season (or £5m a season of the owner does not inject equity to cover losses).

 Losses are assessed over three seasons (rather than just over the single, previous season)

The assessment of each club’s finances is a combination of a historic assessment (looking at figures for the two previous completed season) and an assessment over the season currently taking place

 

http://www.financialfairplay.co.uk/financial-fair-play-explained.php

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Owlinmad said:

Then he is wrong.

One of you is !. His post did seem fairly detailed and he’s usually bang on the money. What makes you think that “there are NO transfer restrictions imposed “ ? .

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Mcguigan
58 minutes ago, Triple O said:

Not according to this.

 

There are a number key changes:

The assessment is carried out in March (rather than December)

The maximum loss limit is now £13m per Championship season (or £5m a season of the owner does not inject equity to cover losses).

 Losses are assessed over three seasons (rather than just over the single, previous season)

The assessment of each club’s finances is a combination of a historic assessment (looking at figures for the two previous completed season) and an assessment over the season currently taking place

 

http://www.financialfairplay.co.uk/financial-fair-play-explained.php

How a look on the official EFL website, its as up to date as you can get.

 

Appendix 5 - Financial Fair Play Regulations. 

 

2.8  If the P&S Calculation results in a loss that exceeds the Lower Loss Threshold, then the following shall apply:

 

2.8.1  the Club shall provide, by 31 March in the relevant Season, Future Financial Information to cover the period commencing from its last accounting reference date (as defined in section 391 of the 2006 Act) until the end of T+2 and a calculation of estimated aggregated Adjusted Earnings Before Tax until the end of T+2 based on that Future Financial Information;

2.8.2  the Club shall provide such evidence of Secure Funding as the Executive considers sufficient; and

2.8.3  if the Club is unable to provide evidence of Secure Funding as set out in Rule 2.8.2, the Executive shall have the powers set out in Regulation 16.20.

 

The executive powers set out in Regulation 16.20 include soft embargo's. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mcguigan said:

How a look on the official EFL website, its as up to date as you can get.

 

Appendix 5 - Financial Fair Play Regulations. 

 

2.8  If the P&S Calculation results in a loss that exceeds the Lower Loss Threshold, then the following shall apply:

 

2.8.1  the Club shall provide, by 31 March in the relevant Season, Future Financial Information to cover the period commencing from its last accounting reference date (as defined in section 391 of the 2006 Act) until the end of T+2 and a calculation of estimated aggregated Adjusted Earnings Before Tax until the end of T+2 based on that Future Financial Information;

2.8.2  the Club shall provide such evidence of Secure Funding as the Executive considers sufficient; and

2.8.3  if the Club is unable to provide evidence of Secure Funding as set out in Rule 2.8.2, the Executive shall have the powers set out in Regulation 16.20.

 

The executive powers set out in Regulation 16.20 include soft embargo's. 

All this information is great and thanks for finding it. But where have they said that they have applied any sanction/restriction on us?

My belief regarding the difference in allowable funding for the greater losses still stands though. 

Edited by Triple O
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...