Sam Hutchinson position

[Philb125]

9 hours ago, gurujuan said:

Super sub 

Whilst I agree that would be a great option to close games out, I bet he’s earning a crazy amount to be a sub. 

[Night King]

What an absolute joke of a tactical decision yesterday. Why was Hutchinson so far up the pitch? Was he supposed to be man marking Sam Morsey out of the game? Meanwhile we get over ran and concede 2 goals from a midfielder running from deep into the box. Get Hutch on the right side of our back 3 or sitting in front of a back 4. He’s not a good enough footballer to be that high up the pitch. Whilst he’s fit get him in his proper position.

[RUMBELOWS91]

11 hours ago, TINKERBELL said:

Hutchinson needs to be playing centre back with lees

 

Fernando playing behind the front 2 as he's more effective that way

 

Baker in for Palmer 

 

 

Baker is nowhere near ready.

 

Undercooked you might say.

[Shifty Powers]

If we are continuing with 3 at the back, Hutchison has to play there. We are already a shambles at the back, but at least he has the ability to do it. 

 

There were a few moments when he was our furthest player forward and even he looked confused and unsure! 

 

Utterly bizzare.

[shezzas left peg]

17 hours ago, Birley Owl 1867 said:

He was never as good as most made out in here tbf. The suggestion he was a premier league midfielder always made me chuckle.

 

Still, put him at CB and he's by far our best player there.

If it wasn't for us having to stick him in midfield and we'd have paired him and Lees together, he'd probably have reached the level of a solid Premier cb. 

He's not a 6ft 3inch monster, but he's good in the air, reads the game probably better than anyone else we have apart from maybe kieron Lee and has great awereness. I'm not saying at the manc clubs or back at Chelsea, but for maybe a Southampton or Burnley. 

Needs playing Central cb for me if we're playing a 3, organising and leading those around him. 

Edited August 5, 2018 by shezzas left peg

[owls-swfc]

17 hours ago, Shetland Owl said:

Hutch at CB in place of  Van Aken

Me at CB in place of Van Aken on yesterday's performance (and I'm wrong side of 50 and only 5' 3") 

[Tea Baggins]

The way he limped away from the ground yesterday I'll be surprised to see him playing next week.

[Holmowl]

1 minute ago, GHS said:

The way he limped away from the ground yesterday I'll be surprised to see him playing next week.

 

Oh dear.

 

Worries me to death that we will have to play JVA. 

 

 

[Swiss Toni]

Just stop putting players in positions they don’t play or haven’t played before.

 

Palmer - Not a RWB and never has been. Personally his best position is back up RB and that’s not being anti-Palmer, it’s the truth.

Pudil - Not a CB and never has been. If he can’t play LB or LWB due to his age then why did we keep him? He’s the only one natural to play LWB at present.

Hutchinson - Not an AM and never has been. Has to be playing CB and it’s blindingly obvious.

Forestieri - Has never performed well for us in a from 2. He’s best in a supporting role or wide attacking one where the game is in front of him.

 

Theres 4 positions there addressed.